I agree - but have you also seen the Maloney "press releases" on her ?Captain Hook wrote:Why doesn't HS Press engage with the community here on Boxrec rather than dumping pics of the back of chairs and empty rooms....?
...might win you boys a bit more publicity and props mate.
To be fair Frank Moloney actually does get involved on occasion.bripez wrote:I agree - but have you also seen the Maloney "press releases" on her ?Captain Hook wrote:Why doesn't HS Press engage with the community here on Boxrec rather than dumping pics of the back of chairs and empty rooms....?
...might win you boys a bit more publicity and props mate.
Both are missing a serious opportunity in my opinion, but there you go - loads of people have commented, but they obviously do not listen.
I know, the forum has had enough of this 'knock down ginger' rubbish. Their so unresponsive (Hennessy) that it feels like the site it getting spammed, rather than receiveing input from a team most of us want to do well. For a group doing so well with some parts of the media, it would seem that the obvious 'bread and butter' is being neglected.Captain Hook wrote:There is some serious debate among some seriously intelligent people on here..
...bar meself, obviously
So come on HS and FM, get some feedback, don't just shovel this mediocre dross on our doorstep and then run away like a kid chucking a duff firecracker through an OAP's letterbox
You need us, act like it
PS Agree with a lot of this, but if they want people to have more care for Tyson Fury they should go about it a different way...reggaereggae wrote:Regardless of how you view Fury; he is good for British boxing - he gets press (because of his name, record, background and mouth....oh and perhaps Hennessy's overactive PR!)
He has a decent piece in teh Sun today for example, and he is boxing on terrestrial TV.
If you care about Boxing you would want him to do well.
Well to be fair you are usually having a dig at him in one way or another.Captain Hook wrote:Where did we say we didn't want him to do well?
Well, not specifically.... but there is a certain amount of negativity surrounding Tyson....a lot of it justified. But I'm just saying that certainly for the moment we should wish him success for boxing's sakeCaptain Hook wrote:Where did we say we didn't want him to do well?
William Hill took in two separate bets of £5,000 on Pajkic to win. Big money for a big underdog.dewipowell wrote:Pajkic is 7/1 to win with Ladbrokes. I find that crazy! After the way Firtha got to Fury I'll be having a few quid on Pajkic.
No need to bring chambers2 into this is there!JamesH wrote: I know, the forum has had enough of this 'knock down ginger' rubbish.
It's fine doing interviews but if he wants to be involved in the forum then I think they should respond to questions here. Even if the response is to say they can't answer it, it would be better than ignoring it in my view.slapbangwhallop wrote:If you want to hear from Mick then he is an interview with him that I did yesterday. There are loads of other videos including one of the public workout, the press conference and one-to-ones with Fury and Pajkic but a certain chap on here only allowed two links a week from non BoxRec sites, well to he honest the rule only applies to some.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZeUbvDJ ... er&list=UL
Deno1986 wrote:William Hill took in two separate bets of £5,000 on Pajkic to win. Big money for a big underdog.dewipowell wrote:Pajkic is 7/1 to win with Ladbrokes. I find that crazy! After the way Firtha got to Fury I'll be having a few quid on Pajkic.
That is some big money. I think Pakjic is worth a few quid. He turns up in shape and if he can follow Firtha's lead he might be able to capitilise.
Was it hagler2002Deno1986 wrote:William Hill took in two separate bets of £5,000 on Pajkic to win. Big money for a big underdog.dewipowell wrote:Pajkic is 7/1 to win with Ladbrokes. I find that crazy! After the way Firtha got to Fury I'll be having a few quid on Pajkic.
From a man who only posts about the Irish? You're very limited, but you know that.slapbangwhallop wrote:Well to be fair you are usually having a dig at him in one way or another.Captain Hook wrote:Where did we say we didn't want him to do well?
I find your posts pretty self serving and pompous so I can understand why some promoters cant be arsed with the hassle of engaging with you, or the likes!
Where wwas this information garnered?Deno1986 wrote:William Hill took in two separate bets of £5,000 on Pajkic to win. Big money for a big underdog.dewipowell wrote:Pajkic is 7/1 to win with Ladbrokes. I find that crazy! After the way Firtha got to Fury I'll be having a few quid on Pajkic.
I follow Graeme Sharpe from William Hill on Twitter.reggaereggae wrote:Where wwas this information garnered?Deno1986 wrote:William Hill took in two separate bets of £5,000 on Pajkic to win. Big money for a big underdog.dewipowell wrote:Pajkic is 7/1 to win with Ladbrokes. I find that crazy! After the way Firtha got to Fury I'll be having a few quid on Pajkic.