Should be.BoxBuzz wrote:I assume the rule will be true for the Marciano Wills affair as well.
How many defences has Rocky got now?
Should be.BoxBuzz wrote:I assume the rule will be true for the Marciano Wills affair as well.
JDC wrote:Stribling has had 7 title fights.
4 losses from injury (3 cuts & one broken hand)
2 Split decisions
1 legit stoppage (way back in week 8 in his very attempt)
Hardly ''choking''
cSo I give a the new guy a chance to prove himself, so what? We really need to get over this, would you all have said the same thing if I had've gave those shots to Dan, DEG or Hog?jBacca wrote:You're choices are farcical. You have one of the top two fighters here but you gift shots to a complete noob who hasn't been here for more than two weeks. Then you grant Norton a fight. Ridiculous.
FGrankly, I don't see why not. But I am not naive enough to be convinced that they will be.jBacca wrote: Do you think these fights should count as eligible defences?
Well you would say that, considering the special relationship that you have exhibited with Kevo over the course of the past 5 seasons since The Great Deletion.jBacca wrote:Stribling has already beat Ali and they had scores to settle. Good choice of fight.
Butr Tuyson has become a World Champion. Stribling has not.glittermonkey wrote:Tyson's more of a choker than Stribling. Unlike Stribling, you'd expect Tyson to win plenty of title fights. So far he's failed in three title attempts, and lost the title in his first defence another three times.
Crease wrote:
From time to time I get fucked off with the double standards in this place, and this is just another example of it.
Best 2nd round draft pick out there Crease. I'm more than happy with his performances this seasonCrease wrote:JDC wrote:Stribling has had 7 title fights.
4 losses from injury (3 cuts & one broken hand)
2 Split decisions
1 legit stoppage (way back in week 8 in his very attempt)
Hardly ''choking''![]()
Well it can't be called "achieving" can it? Stribling has had more shots than pratically everyone, if he fails to win a World Title, he will have no-one to blame but himself.
Indeed. A "no-hoper" who has never slipped out the the Commish's rankings.kevo wrote:They aren't facing no-hopers like Louis.
Crease wrote:Indeed. A "no-hoper" who has never slipped out the the Commish's rankings.kevo wrote:They aren't facing no-hopers like Louis.
![]()
![]()
I actually rank Ken Norton in my top 20 Heavyweights of all time. Ken has proved that on his best day, he could beat Muhammad Ali.kevo wrote: Eh? You really think that Norton has a chance against Louis?
Proper order.Crease wrote:Joe Louis succeds in defending his WBO Title in three title defences and he is not elligible to unify.
Bah humbug!!!