murray.macklin.barker

Post Reply
leeharding
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 589
Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18

murray.macklin.barker

Post by leeharding »

so now we have seen them all in top level fights,who do you think would be no1 if all 3 met. ide go for murray :TU: :TU:
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by tear up »

ill have barker :TU:
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by Dan Dares »

id have murray
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by pyenest77 »

Tough one. It would be a great Eubank-Watson-Benn type trilogy, but chances are they are all going in different directions. I would go for Barker, but its a difficult one!
Andypittcov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by Andypittcov »

Thought macklin then changed to barker after his excellent effort with Martinez now after last night I'm edging towards Murray. Eff knows it's that close.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Barker&Murray for me with Macklin just behind...
smcb80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 18 May 2011, 08:27

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by smcb80 »

i'd say it will take for one of them to get a belt before they all fight each other. would be a series of huge fights for all of them
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by leforge »

One of them needs a world title for it to happen.If I was Eddie Hearn get Geal next or Sturm for Barker. Hoping Murray get Sturm again!
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by Camcas »

1) Barker
2) Murray
3) Macklin
smcb80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 18 May 2011, 08:27

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by smcb80 »

throw Andy Lee into the mix as well.
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by SAPFO »

Image
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by SAPFO »

Barker v Strum would be interesting..
leeharding
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 589
Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by leeharding »

carlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remach :TU:
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by Matt W »

Barker's the best of the 3 for me and I'd pick him over Sturm.
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by SAPFO »

leeharding wrote:
carlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remach :TU:
He has never fought him :KO:
leeharding
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 589
Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Post by leeharding »

carlbcfc wrote:
leeharding wrote:
carlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remach :TU:
He has never fought him :KO:
murray remach we mean m8 :TU:
Post Reply