murray.macklin.barker
-
leeharding
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 589
- Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18
murray.macklin.barker
so now we have seen them all in top level fights,who do you think would be no1 if all 3 met. ide go for murray

Re: murray.macklin.barker
ill have barker 
Re: murray.macklin.barker
id have murray
Re: murray.macklin.barker
Tough one. It would be a great Eubank-Watson-Benn type trilogy, but chances are they are all going in different directions. I would go for Barker, but its a difficult one!
-
Andypittcov
- Heavyweight

Re: murray.macklin.barker
Thought macklin then changed to barker after his excellent effort with Martinez now after last night I'm edging towards Murray. Eff knows it's that close.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: murray.macklin.barker
Barker&Murray for me with Macklin just behind...
Re: murray.macklin.barker
i'd say it will take for one of them to get a belt before they all fight each other. would be a series of huge fights for all of them
Re: murray.macklin.barker
One of them needs a world title for it to happen.If I was Eddie Hearn get Geal next or Sturm for Barker. Hoping Murray get Sturm again!
Re: murray.macklin.barker
1) Barker
2) Murray
3) Macklin
2) Murray
3) Macklin
Re: murray.macklin.barker
throw Andy Lee into the mix as well.
Re: murray.macklin.barker
Barker v Strum would be interesting..
-
leeharding
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 589
- Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18
Re: murray.macklin.barker
i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remachcarlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
Re: murray.macklin.barker
Barker's the best of the 3 for me and I'd pick him over Sturm.
Re: murray.macklin.barker
He has never fought himleeharding wrote:i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remachcarlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
-
leeharding
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 589
- Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18
Re: murray.macklin.barker
murray remach we mean m8carlbcfc wrote:He has never fought himleeharding wrote:i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remachcarlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
