ring record books

Tomato-Can · Post by **Tomato-Can** » 29 Dec 2001, 10:03

are the herbet goldman edition of ring record books considered to be more accurate than the nat fleischer editions.

Matt · Post by **Matt** » 29 Dec 2001, 14:47

Yes, especially in the encyclopedia. Goldman reviewed most of the records in there and added and corrected many of the errors, with the help of others as well.

Tomato-Can · Post by **Tomato-Can** » 29 Dec 2001, 15:16

thanks matt.

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 31 Dec 2001, 11:08

I have several Ring Record Books for sale or trade at the moment if anyone is interested, looking for magazines prior to 1950's particulary Boxing News (Boxing) and The Ring

Kevin

Matt · Post by **Matt** » 31 Dec 2001, 12:38

Which editions do you have for sale?

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 31 Dec 2001, 13:49

1957, 1958, 1961. 1962, 1963, 1964, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1976, 1977, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983

Plus loads of Boxing News and British Boxing Yearbooks 1970-1992, plus 1959 and 1961

E-mail me at [email protected] if interested and I will send details of books conditions and prices for sale or trade etc.

Kevin