Our Bomber as a possible allegedly Commentator
-
IRLangmaid25
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08
Our Bomber as a possible allegedly Commentator
While I was out and about I had had a random thought process when you are out shopping and came up with this. What do you think about our much beloved Bomber (Tony Bellew) should be given a try out on allegedly as a commentator. Because think about it allegedly has used both Enzo Mac and Paul Smith on there and they been good on there as they have recent inside knowledge and hear what is going on within the trade etc, and I think Bomber would make a cracking commentator alongside allegedly's resident Fighting Talker John Rawlings as Bomber knows his stuff. He is also very passionate about the fight game and comes over pretty well when he has posted on here. What does everyone else think about it too and what does the man himself think too.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
I agree mate i think he'd be good
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
Bomber would be an excellent colour commentator. Enzo has been very good and so was Smigga too. All intelligent, eloquent lads.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
Bomber always comes across well
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
Smith's really good on the co-commentating but I'm not sure the TV could take two scousers talking at once?
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5462
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
It would have to be one scouser at a time I agree.
-
IRLangmaid25
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
Paul Smith was (probably) only on the mike because Enzo Mac was in the ring against Gyorgy Marosi last time, and after he stopped Marosi he turned towards Smith and said that you are in my seat which was quite funny and Smith took it in good grace and I was impressed with Smith as well as he was intelligent and eloquent as well and came over pretty well and should be given another card to commentate on, and I think Forcefraser is worried if we had two Scousers on the mike the Southerners amongst us would need subtitles!!Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Bomber would be an excellent colour commentator. Enzo has been very good and so was Smigga too. All intelligent, eloquent lads.
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
great guy bomber and thinkin hell do very good 
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
Yeah he'd be a great choice IMO
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
I think Bellew would be good.
There isn't much between Smigga and Enzo, if anything I'd say Smith was slightly better to be honest, but Enzo is very good in his own right.
There isn't much between Smigga and Enzo, if anything I'd say Smith was slightly better to be honest, but Enzo is very good in his own right.
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
bomber will be the tony montana of commentary. love the guy love his style and imo he beat nathan.
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
Brown nose at it's bestmugabi wrote:bomber will be the tony montana of commentary. love the guy love his style and imo he beat nathan.
Re: Our Bomber as a possible Allegedly channel Commentator
He is an intelligent lad, is Bomber, so it would be a good move at some point. Same for Smith.
Definitely prefer Smith to Enzo, based on his one appearance. Enzo just repeats himself, doesn't really offer much insight and constantly agrees with Rawlings. People who say he is good are probably just saying that as he is a good bloke, which he is.
Just not really a good commentator, imo.
Definitely prefer Smith to Enzo, based on his one appearance. Enzo just repeats himself, doesn't really offer much insight and constantly agrees with Rawlings. People who say he is good are probably just saying that as he is a good bloke, which he is.
Just not really a good commentator, imo.