quigg v arthur
quigg v arthur
jamie arthur is conning out of retirement again to fight quigg, really poor match making from the hattons don't know how the board can justify sanctioning the fight given arthur is coming off a loss to booth
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/jamie- ... g-february
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/jamie- ... g-february
Re: quigg v arthur
Board sanction anything!diggler wrote:jamie arthur is conning out of retirement again to fight quigg, really poor match making from the hattons don't know how the board can justify sanctioning the fight given arthur is coming off a loss to booth
Re: quigg v arthur
Robbie Turley wants the fight But he said Hattons turned him down ?
Re: quigg v arthur
I like Jamie Arthur and I hope he's getting a good few quid for this, but I have to agree it ain't exactly matchup of the year. I was expecting Frampton.
Re: quigg v arthur
Jamie Arthur deserves it much more than him.princess wrote:Robbie Turley wants the fight But he said Hattons turned him down ?
Re: quigg v arthur
hope its not arthur it should only b frampton hattons been calling him out on the net for the fight and he due to fight the week b4 the quigg date of 4th feb. im going to watch my cuz on that show wanna see a good top of the bill
-
themadmariner
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 43
- Joined: 20 Sep 2011, 07:46
Re: quigg v arthur
Most champions try and get one relatively easy first defence in don't they.
Quigg v Frampton is being saved for a little further down the line and there isn't a problem with that, as it makes sense for both fighters.
Quigg v Frampton is being saved for a little further down the line and there isn't a problem with that, as it makes sense for both fighters.
-
ScottDetonator
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33
Re: quigg v arthur
Well, it looks a pointless match up on paper but it is for a British Title and the division is not exactly thriving. I think its a matter of Quigg getting the experience of fighting at a slightly higher level than he has previous, meaning a British title defence, I'm not saying Arthur is a step up, more the occasion.
Although, you have to question what he will learn from dominating a much weaker man in Arthur from start to finish(which should be 3 rounds max). Hope the ref stops it before Arthur is hurt![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
Although, you have to question what he will learn from dominating a much weaker man in Arthur from start to finish(which should be 3 rounds max). Hope the ref stops it before Arthur is hurt
Re: quigg v arthur
madness that a fighter can just come back and get a title shot, you should have to work your way into that position not just be handed the chance
-
dewipowell
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 232
- Joined: 05 Nov 2010, 21:51
Re: quigg v arthur
Come on guys, this is harsh on Jamie. He lost his British title fight by a really close decision so he's hardly as undeserving at another shot as some are saying. And I really doubt Arthur will be the weaker man, he used to be at lightweight and he's big at super-bantam.
Re: quigg v arthur
Jamie is massive for the weight and will offer a totally different test to Booth. He is fit and strong. But i expect it to prove a mismatch with Arthur being dispatched with in 6. However, i have no qualms with it as if he wants to win the lonsdale outright then it's a defence. it probably makes more sense to win lonsdale outright before facing Frampton as once that fight happens then the winner must advance on from domestic level and leave british title behind.
Re: quigg v arthur
Not a great match up, not much else up there (Frampton aside). Arthur is sanctionable for sure.