Khan/Bollocks

Post Reply
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Khan/Bollocks

Post by Dioufy »

Do these go hand in hand, in both contexts?

Amir Khan holds 3 world titles. Eh. News to me all right. 3? I swore it was 2.

Apparentely he holds the WBA and IBF belts. Oh ok - that's what I thought but why did he say 3 belts.

Ah, the WBA super belt.

What the fornicate is going on - how can Khan claim to be a current double world champion within the same sanctioning body within the same division? Isn't that like Andy Murray saying he's a double Wimbledon champ because the final overlapped from a Sunday to Monday.

Mental.

Plus, don't believe Sky when they hype Peterson. Khan takes him (if Peterson isn't metal jawed) out or wide points.

Khan KO 9.

:TU:
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by loaded_gloves »

The WBA basically opened the floodgates for mass, barefaced, outright sanctioning body corruption when they introduced the super belt rule in 2001.

They realised they could get away with it, and boxers and promoters would comply with them.

Boxing died that day.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by funso banjo baby »

loaded_gloves wrote:The WBA basically opened the floodgates for mass, barefaced, outright sanctioning body corruption when they introduced the super belt rule in 2001.

They realised they could get away with it, and boxers and promoters would comply with them.

Boxing died that day.

i think you'll find boxing died (in Britain) with the onset of sky tv :shame:
jimcook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 842
Joined: 28 Jun 2005, 14:05

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by jimcook »

funso banjo baby wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:The WBA basically opened the floodgates for mass, barefaced, outright sanctioning body corruption when they introduced the super belt rule in 2001.

They realised they could get away with it, and boxers and promoters would comply with them.

Boxing died that day.

i think you'll find boxing died (in Britain) with the onset of sky tv :shame:
couldnt agree more
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by loaded_gloves »

At least the grizzly corpse was exhumed and given a further kicking in 1996 with the introduction of PPV.
sy86
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 105
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 07:11

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by sy86 »

Think they mean the Ring belt??
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by Finn »

he hasnt got the ring title. Although i can see his point he won the wba title then won the wba super title and IBF title. Its grasping at straws a bit though :lol:
sy86
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 105
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 07:11

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by sy86 »

I've seen pictures of khan with 3 belts.

Black -WBA
Red -IBF
Red/white/blue - similar to the ring belt.


Interim ring champion?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by crusader »

The red/white/blue bellt is the WBA super championship.

Image
Karl Jade
Cruiserweight
Posts: 734
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 16:40

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by Karl Jade »

Terrible analogy regarding Murray.
Spiker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 591
Joined: 15 Mar 2008, 14:24

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by Spiker »

Well he has 3 belts then!
Why shouldnt he advertise himself?? Haye had you all thinking his crap was made of gold then he lost!!
At Least Khan is legit :box:
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Peterson is way too slow to even be competitive in this fight 120-108
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by Taansend »

I stopped worrying about belts years ago. Boxing fans know who the top fighters in each division are.

Until we trim down the amount of divisions & cut the proper champions to one per weight no casual fans really care.

Unless a fighter has been at the top for a few years (irregardless of belts).
Boxing Addict
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 07:35

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by Boxing Addict »

Khan's got two legitimate belts

WBA Super Champion - (Maidana has the regular! WBA title) they need to do a rematch
IBF Champion

WBO - Timothy Bradley
WBC - Erik Morales

I'm sure the ring magazing champ is Bradley as he appears in the rings lb for lb lists.

He shouldn't be fighting Lamont, either a rematch with Maidana or Bradley, Alexander or even Morales are the best at this division. What about Danny Garcia?

In my view he needs to stop Lamont in good fashion if he wants the big fights next year

I don't reckon Sky really wanted to show this fight, but they have a three fight deal with Khan and Goldenboy picks all the fights.

This Lamont has been picked for Khan to look the business, its his show, and he has to come up with the goods if his to get the big fights he wants next year
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by loaded_gloves »

Taansend wrote:I stopped worrying about belts years ago. Boxing fans know who the top fighters in each division are.
But that's the problem. Boxing fans are now a tiny minority.

The millions of casual sports fans who used to watch boxing and read newspapers see all this shit and cannot get their head around it. All these divisions, all these crappy fighters as world champions. Sitting in a pub and seeing Nathan Cleverly vs Kuziemski or Haye vs Harrison for 'world titles' (ON PPV!) is pretty much a rock solid guarantee to put blokes off boxing FOR LIFE.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Khan/Bollocks

Post by bigjack »

funso banjo baby wrote:
loaded_gloves wrote:The WBA basically opened the floodgates for mass, barefaced, outright sanctioning body corruption when they introduced the super belt rule in 2001.

They realised they could get away with it, and boxers and promoters would comply with them.

Boxing died that day.

i think you'll find boxing died (in Britain) with the onset of sky tv :shame:


I totally agree with that
Post Reply