Happy that Khan lost his belts?
Happy that Khan lost his belts?
He evidently polarizes opinion within the discerning boxing fraternity like no other fighter since Eubank, who everyone loved eventually.
So when it came to the verdict, were you rooting for Peterson to get the nod?
So when it came to the verdict, were you rooting for Peterson to get the nod?
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
I do not support Khan purely because he is a Brit, it is also because he is a damn exciting fighter
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
Exactly. He is a good fighter, being British has nothing to do with it. I would be more disappointed if someone like Donaire was to lose anytime soon and he is a Fillipino and I am most definitely not.Coco wrote:I do not support Khan purely because he is a Brit, it is also because he is a damn exciting fighter
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
Exactly. He is a good fighter, being British has nothing to do with it. I would be more disappointed if someone like Donaire was to lose anytime soon and he is a Fillipino and I am most definitely am not.Coco wrote:I do not support Khan purely because he is a Brit, it is also because he is a damn exciting fighter
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
yes im happy
he is still saying that he will fight mayweather in 2013 , the defeat was good for him , he has learned something etc etc etc
khan isnt the smartest tool in the box by a long way
ps: amir - you have no divine right to fight peterson again as YOU and YOUR team have NO options on peterson , i hope he makes you wait for the re-match , while you are waiting why dont you rematch prescott again , you know they guy you have plain refused to fight again.
yes sunday morning was a great start to the day
he is still saying that he will fight mayweather in 2013 , the defeat was good for him , he has learned something etc etc etc
khan isnt the smartest tool in the box by a long way
ps: amir - you have no divine right to fight peterson again as YOU and YOUR team have NO options on peterson , i hope he makes you wait for the re-match , while you are waiting why dont you rematch prescott again , you know they guy you have plain refused to fight again.
yes sunday morning was a great start to the day
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
boxerbob wrote:yes im happy
he is still saying that he will fight mayweather in 2013 , the defeat was good for him , he has learned something etc etc etc
khan isnt the smartest tool in the box by a long way
ps: amir - you have no divine right to fight peterson again as YOU and YOUR team have NO options on peterson , i hope he makes you wait for the re-match , while you are waiting why dont you rematch prescott again , you know they guy you have plain refused to fight again.
yes sunday morning was a great start to the day
It certainly was,i think could peterson could make decent money defending the titles in washington without khan,of course he won't get big bucks.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
No I'm not happy. When the top fighters are doing well, boxing benefits all round with the sport gaining in popularity and other fighters reaping the rewards with more tv slots etc. Khan has done more for British boxing over the last 10 years than almost anybody
I don't have a problem with Khan, he is usually in exciting fights, talented but also massively flawed.
So he's arrogant? If people disliked all fighters because of that there would be about 2 popular boxers.
I don't have a problem with Khan, he is usually in exciting fights, talented but also massively flawed.
So he's arrogant? If people disliked all fighters because of that there would be about 2 popular boxers.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
Khan can only benefit from the love/hate relationship he seems to have built with the public.
If 50% of the fans hate you they wanna see you get pasted, if 50% love you then they wanna see you win. That basically means 100% are watching!
He's not my cup of tea but I do enjoy watching his fights. Don't like his attitude etc but very rarely miss him in action.
If 50% of the fans hate you they wanna see you get pasted, if 50% love you then they wanna see you win. That basically means 100% are watching!
He's not my cup of tea but I do enjoy watching his fights. Don't like his attitude etc but very rarely miss him in action.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
This. I've a huge amount of respect for what the lad has done in his career and I like him.Coco wrote:I do not support Khan purely because he is a Brit, it is also because he is a damn exciting fighter
If he could only jettison a few smoke blowers, he'd be better off.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
I was actually talking to Stevek3lly about this yesterday. We'ver both changed our outlook on boxing over the past 12 months.
Previously we have always routed for the brits no matter what fight they are in or who they are fighting. But cocky arrogant fighters like Khan and Haye have made us realise we much prefer the modest, hard working fights, ie Burns and Peterson. These are the kind of people that now seem to take me in and gain my support
Previously we have always routed for the brits no matter what fight they are in or who they are fighting. But cocky arrogant fighters like Khan and Haye have made us realise we much prefer the modest, hard working fights, ie Burns and Peterson. These are the kind of people that now seem to take me in and gain my support
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
I do like to watch Khan fight. What i don't like to do is hear what he wants to say.
Its a well known fact now, that Khan is mildly retarded.
So volume down when he fights -TV off when he's been interviewed!
As others have said. Plain silly to support a guy simply because he's a Brit ...why not expand that to blindly supporting a European over an American ... or even more ignorantly, and support a guy based on the colour of his skin..
Khan losing does not affect me. His fights were on Sky ... which I no longer subscribe to.
Just because he's a Brit hasn't meant Sky show it to me free.
Its a well known fact now, that Khan is mildly retarded.
So volume down when he fights -TV off when he's been interviewed!
As others have said. Plain silly to support a guy simply because he's a Brit ...why not expand that to blindly supporting a European over an American ... or even more ignorantly, and support a guy based on the colour of his skin..
Khan losing does not affect me. His fights were on Sky ... which I no longer subscribe to.
Just because he's a Brit hasn't meant Sky show it to me free.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11808
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
I've always like Khan, most of his fights are exciting. I think he's a good role model for alot of youngsters, i work in a youth centre for 16-24 year olds, and he's one of the only boxers they know and i don't hear them slagging him off. most of them see him as something you can attain to.
-
loaded_gloves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
The fact that there are people who blindly support someone simply because they are British is alarming.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
People dont just support khan because he's a brit - he's a massive draw in the US for a start.loaded_gloves wrote:The fact that there are people who blindly support someone simply because they are British is alarming.
The OP clearly has an agenda otherwise he would have made the options Yes, No or Dont care. Rather than leading questions with no clear way to answer.
If you say you're not happy that khan lost his belts you have to tick an option which says "he's british so i support him regardless".
This crap should be limited to the current scene.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
There should be an option for happy Peterson won.
The guy was rummaging through bins and living under a motorway bridge aged just 10yrs old. That's a terrible start to life. He's fought to the best of his ability, without the aid of a superstar coach, an Olympic medal and a diet guru.
Many would have folded in the opening rounds, under the razzle dazzle. But he dug deep, pressed forward and threw leather. He beat khan up on the ropes for long spells and snatched the belt by the thinnest of margins.
Khan and his huge entourage were beaten-up, humbled and sent packing.
That cock-sure attitude pre Prescott had been simmering back to the surface for some time. Peterson put that back in check. He likely did Amir a favour, and saved him from the thrashing of a lifetime at the hands of Floyd in 2012.
The contrived "I don't blame Peterson, I blame the officials" line had no basis. It's not like the judges gave Lamont 10 rounds from 12 in a razor thin fight. And that is the worrying thing about it all.
The British press have ran the headlines "khan robbed" and a gazillion Facebook fans roared that khan hammered him, robbery etc.
The reality is when Khan was buckling when the fight was taken to him. He should have had those skill sets in his locker to have dealt with it, like Tim Bradley did - but he didn't.
Khan needs to analyse and face up to the real reason he lost against quite a basic operator - but I honestly don't think he will.
The raw materials are there, but I think the boxing brain is just not there. Sure that creates exciting viewing, but ultimately he won't fulfil his potential - or, more concerningly for his loyal fans , he has achieved more than he should have and that he'll never beat Tim Bradley and could even get stuffed hard by Brandon Rios who can definitely take a punch (not a mark after Murray fight) and loves to get macho with his hurtful punches.
The guy was rummaging through bins and living under a motorway bridge aged just 10yrs old. That's a terrible start to life. He's fought to the best of his ability, without the aid of a superstar coach, an Olympic medal and a diet guru.
Many would have folded in the opening rounds, under the razzle dazzle. But he dug deep, pressed forward and threw leather. He beat khan up on the ropes for long spells and snatched the belt by the thinnest of margins.
Khan and his huge entourage were beaten-up, humbled and sent packing.
That cock-sure attitude pre Prescott had been simmering back to the surface for some time. Peterson put that back in check. He likely did Amir a favour, and saved him from the thrashing of a lifetime at the hands of Floyd in 2012.
The contrived "I don't blame Peterson, I blame the officials" line had no basis. It's not like the judges gave Lamont 10 rounds from 12 in a razor thin fight. And that is the worrying thing about it all.
The British press have ran the headlines "khan robbed" and a gazillion Facebook fans roared that khan hammered him, robbery etc.
The reality is when Khan was buckling when the fight was taken to him. He should have had those skill sets in his locker to have dealt with it, like Tim Bradley did - but he didn't.
Khan needs to analyse and face up to the real reason he lost against quite a basic operator - but I honestly don't think he will.
The raw materials are there, but I think the boxing brain is just not there. Sure that creates exciting viewing, but ultimately he won't fulfil his potential - or, more concerningly for his loyal fans , he has achieved more than he should have and that he'll never beat Tim Bradley and could even get stuffed hard by Brandon Rios who can definitely take a punch (not a mark after Murray fight) and loves to get macho with his hurtful punches.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
I, like many others, was pleased when Khan took that humbling defeat to Prescott as the hype machine was getting a bit overload at the time and I didn't care too much about him. But, since that defeat I have grown to like him and enjoy watching him fight and progress.
It's clear he has some huge flaws, and these have been talked about for a long time, but people are so fickle and quick to jump on his back as soon as the bandwagon comes to a screeching halt. Some of the comments just come across as blind hatred, which is a little concerning. I know he often makes a prat of himself with his mouth but he's young and a bit stupid, just ignore it. There's no denying he has talent and potential, he just needs to steady himself a bit and stop believing the hype that surrounds him.
And when it comes to supporting a Brit, I don't think there's anything wrong with that, it is a natural feeling, I am in no way patriotic and my favourite fighter for a long time has been JMM, but it's a natural fit to support a fellow countryman as you are exposed to that fighter a lot more than a foreigner. There have been plenty of occasions where I have supported somebody against a Brit though, but to dismiss anyone for supporting a fighter from your own country is a bit silly, esp when we have natural rivalries with Americans etc for example.
This loss, I am not too fussed about, was a little disappointed as I like to see fighters climb to the top, but like somebody else mentioned the hype was growing into hysteria again, so it is quite timely for us fans and probably Khan himself.
It's clear he has some huge flaws, and these have been talked about for a long time, but people are so fickle and quick to jump on his back as soon as the bandwagon comes to a screeching halt. Some of the comments just come across as blind hatred, which is a little concerning. I know he often makes a prat of himself with his mouth but he's young and a bit stupid, just ignore it. There's no denying he has talent and potential, he just needs to steady himself a bit and stop believing the hype that surrounds him.
And when it comes to supporting a Brit, I don't think there's anything wrong with that, it is a natural feeling, I am in no way patriotic and my favourite fighter for a long time has been JMM, but it's a natural fit to support a fellow countryman as you are exposed to that fighter a lot more than a foreigner. There have been plenty of occasions where I have supported somebody against a Brit though, but to dismiss anyone for supporting a fighter from your own country is a bit silly, esp when we have natural rivalries with Americans etc for example.
This loss, I am not too fussed about, was a little disappointed as I like to see fighters climb to the top, but like somebody else mentioned the hype was growing into hysteria again, so it is quite timely for us fans and probably Khan himself.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
Ricky burns is a good role model. Khan with all the bling, the mouth,the fuckwit videos etc certainly isnt the kind of role model i would want for my children. A greedy, selfish, take no responsibility for your actions, retard and bully. if the youth of today look up to likes of khan then we really are in trouble...oops, i forgot ...we are.Old bones Ian wrote:I've always like Khan, most of his fights are exciting. I think he's a good role model for alot of youngsters, i work in a youth centre for 16-24 year olds, and he's one of the only boxers they know and i don't hear them slagging him off. most of them see him as something you can attain to.
another thing i wanted to say...i never understood the patriotic nonsense in boxing....i have always followed boxers because of the way they fight or act or the things they say, regardless of where they come from, race culture etc
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
Great fighter, improved a lot since Prescott and I felt he beat Peterson.
British or not, why anyone would be thrilled to see him lose his belts is beyond me, it really is.
He's not that bad a guy.
I hope he gets the rematch, beats Peterson (again) and goes on to fight Mayweather.
I don't think he'd beat Floyd, but are we going to criticise him for aiming high rather than defending his belt against a series of tomato cans? Not me.
Peterson is a very good boxer and has a story. He got the hometown decision and now it's up to Khan to get the world titles back. Won't be easy.
Should be another good scrap in 2012, one we should be looking forward to rather than taking another opportunity to kick lumps out of him.
British or not, why anyone would be thrilled to see him lose his belts is beyond me, it really is.
He's not that bad a guy.
I hope he gets the rematch, beats Peterson (again) and goes on to fight Mayweather.
I don't think he'd beat Floyd, but are we going to criticise him for aiming high rather than defending his belt against a series of tomato cans? Not me.
Peterson is a very good boxer and has a story. He got the hometown decision and now it's up to Khan to get the world titles back. Won't be easy.
Should be another good scrap in 2012, one we should be looking forward to rather than taking another opportunity to kick lumps out of him.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
Coco wrote:I do not support Khan purely because he is a Brit, it is also because he is a damn exciting fighter
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
well saidCaptain Hook wrote:Great fighter, improved a lot since Prescott and I felt he beat Peterson.
British or not, why anyone would be thrilled to see him lose his belts is beyond me, it really is.
He's not that bad a guy.
I hope he gets the rematch, beats Peterson (again) and goes on to fight Mayweather.
I don't think he'd beat Floyd, but are we going to criticise him for aiming high rather than defending his belt against a series of tomato cans? Not me.
Peterson is a very good boxer and has a story. He got the hometown decision and now it's up to Khan to get the world titles back. Won't be easy.
Should be another good scrap in 2012, one we should be looking forward to rather than taking another opportunity to kick lumps out of him.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
Am I missing something? When does Khan have all the 'bling'? The mouth? Oh and fuckwit videos? ....And when has he been a bully? ...A retarded one? Please give examplesjimcook wrote:Ricky burns is a good role model. Khan with all the bling, the mouth,the fuckwit videos etc certainly isnt the kind of role model i would want for my children. A greedy, selfish, take no responsibility for your actions, retard and bully. if the youth of today look up to likes of khan then we really are in trouble...oops, i forgot ...we are.Old bones Ian wrote:I've always like Khan, most of his fights are exciting. I think he's a good role model for alot of youngsters, i work in a youth centre for 16-24 year olds, and he's one of the only boxers they know and i don't hear them slagging him off. most of them see him as something you can attain to.
another thing i wanted to say...i never understood the patriotic nonsense in boxing....i have always followed boxers because of the way they fight or act or the things they say, regardless of where they come from, race culture etc
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
It seems like there are 3 sides to Khan.
The in-ring boxer, there is not much to dislike as he entertains.
The n0b who says stupid things without thinking. But then he is young.
Then the one who comes across okay as a pundit/commentator. Possibly has a future there when he retires.
He says some stupid shite, but then so have I in my life. He is a Brit, so I support his boxing regardless. Same with Haye.
The in-ring boxer, there is not much to dislike as he entertains.
The n0b who says stupid things without thinking. But then he is young.
Then the one who comes across okay as a pundit/commentator. Possibly has a future there when he retires.
He says some stupid shite, but then so have I in my life. He is a Brit, so I support his boxing regardless. Same with Haye.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
I don't mind Khan, but I can't stand all this ''Team Khan'' bollocks, especially those twats Saj and Asif Vali.
None of them have got his best interests at heart, and they paint him out to be an arrogant, money grabbing wanker, when he's probably a nice-ish, if a bit dim kid who probably wants to be left alone to get on with his job.
The loss won't do him much harm, it'll make him focus a bit more to improve. I wouldn't take an immediate rematch with Peterson, he'd lose again without some significant adjustments to his style. Lamont made the adjustment superbly and controlled most of the fight, I don't give much credit to a man mainly flurrying and missing, then running away to avoid an inside fight (or plain fouling).
Haye is different, a more boring, loathsome character there surely isn't in boxing. Apart from Alex Ariza perhaps. I'd support al-Qaeda against that fornicator.
And his fights are sleep inducing too since he moved up to HW.
None of them have got his best interests at heart, and they paint him out to be an arrogant, money grabbing wanker, when he's probably a nice-ish, if a bit dim kid who probably wants to be left alone to get on with his job.
The loss won't do him much harm, it'll make him focus a bit more to improve. I wouldn't take an immediate rematch with Peterson, he'd lose again without some significant adjustments to his style. Lamont made the adjustment superbly and controlled most of the fight, I don't give much credit to a man mainly flurrying and missing, then running away to avoid an inside fight (or plain fouling).
Haye is different, a more boring, loathsome character there surely isn't in boxing. Apart from Alex Ariza perhaps. I'd support al-Qaeda against that fornicator.
And his fights are sleep inducing too since he moved up to HW.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
You missed Pac Marquez 3 then? I'll sum it up for you: "Back hand. We offered Bradley the fight. Back hand".carlbcfc wrote:
Then the one who comes across okay as a pundit/commentator. Possibly has a future there when he retires.
Re: Happy that Khan lost his belts?
I voted the second option, because I wanted Amir to win and so it is the closest to my opinion, but this poll is very skewed toward an agenda. "He's a Brit so I support him regardless" is a stupid option. Regardless of what? I really don't think Amir's that big a dick at all. I don't dislike him. He's alright. I support him because I'm a fan, he's a good boxer and an alright lad and I want him to win. I DO support him because he is from my country, but I do not dislike him and just support him anyway. I don't think he's that bad at all.
Jesus, how many of us are Tyson fans? The guy is a convicted rapist who ate ears! It's hard to find a bigger asshole, yet we let it go because he was that exciting.
Khan actually comes across as quite a nice lad who has confidence in himself and is honest, sometimes saying things that annoy others. I do not get the hate against him at all.
Jesus, how many of us are Tyson fans? The guy is a convicted rapist who ate ears! It's hard to find a bigger asshole, yet we let it go because he was that exciting.
Khan actually comes across as quite a nice lad who has confidence in himself and is honest, sometimes saying things that annoy others. I do not get the hate against him at all.