Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Yeah. I remember reading that Khan only had the one workout with Pacquiao at the very start of his move over but then they never got back in the ring just trained alongside each other for a bit.
los2
Cruiserweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 30 May 2011, 04:38

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by los2 »

FtmPress wrote:who has brook boxed he got a padded record and when he steps up will be found out let him fight a a real one oppent.
when you look at the world class fighters you promote you must be relieved you never signed brook.....
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by whiskey »

observer1 wrote:
G0mez wrote:Brook knocks Tomato out.
Hope he does for your sake, it'd make your life a little less empty. :TU:
If by some divine intervention the fight ever gets made, I'll wager a bet that Brook not only beats Khan, he halts him.

A mod can play banker.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by observer1 »

G0mez wrote:
observer1 wrote:
G0mez wrote:Brook knocks Tomato out.
Hope he does for your sake, it'd make your life a little less empty. :TU:
If by some divine intervention the fight ever gets made, I'll wager a bet that Brook not only beats Khan, he halts him.

A mod can play banker.
Your post suggests that i care whether Khan wins or not. :confused:
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13438
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by jameswilson »

Gazmac81 wrote:is "kid" a sheffield phrase ??

they seem to use it quite a lot
No offence to anyone from Sheffiled but I always think their accent is quite high pitched. Is there something in the water up there that means their nuts don't drop until they are in their 60s?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by whiskey »

observer1 wrote:
Your post suggests that i care whether Khan wins or not. :confused:
Nope, your constant defence of him does confirms it.

You even claimed that a man who was killed by Khan in his 4x4, wasn't actually killed by Khan, but the result of his injuries. You leapt to the defence of his criticism through the red top press of Rob Mckracken. In another thread your defending and justifying him going to the sanctioning bodies to upturn a legit loss.

Even in this thread, the mere mention of the likely outcome of Khan vs Brook had you leaping in to attack someone who dared say Khan gets walloped.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by Quixall »

Livingstone Cole wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
Gazmac81 wrote:is "kid" a sheffield phrase ??

they seem to use it quite a lot
No offence to anyone from Sheffiled but I always think their accent is quite high pitched. Is there something in the water up there that means their nuts don't drop until they are in their 60s?
Eh? Never had anyone else point out that we're high-pitched.
Does Sean Bean sound high pitched ?
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by observer1 »

G0mez wrote:
observer1 wrote:
Your post suggests that i care whether Khan wins or not. :confused:
Nope, your constant defence of him does confirms it.

You even claimed that a man who was killed by Khan in his 4x4, wasn't actually killed by Khan, but the result of his injuries. You leapt to the defence of his criticism through the red top press of Rob Mckracken. In another thread your defending and justifying him going to the sanctioning bodies to upturn a legit loss.

Even in this thread, the mere mention of the likely outcome of Khan vs Brook had you leaping in to attack someone who dared say Khan gets walloped.
Firstly, I don't remember commenting on his 4x4 accident, but if that is the case, that was my wrong doing and i'll own up to that.

Secondly, I'm not justifying Khan for appealing the Khan-Peterson decision. I'll be the first to say it's unsportsmanlike and he should accept it. But as it stands, He lost by a point and is upset about the two point deductions, therefore it is understandable for a boxer to do what he did. It's not the first time a Boxer has not agree with the final verdict giving him a loss. Dang, even in Don King's heydays, nearly every fighters' loss had an appeal take place afterwards.

Thirdly, Kell Brook is a solid operator, but is still far away from the next level where the likes of Khan, Maidina, Alexander, Bradley, Person, Ortiz etc. are operating. If you i'm crazy to think Brook's struggles against these guys, so be it.

The only Defense i have made of Amir Khan, and many other boxers (Both UK and NON-UK) is against double standards. There are countless other boxers who do the same as Khan if not worse inside and outside the ring. Yet people turn a blind eye to some of these names.

Fact is, of all the people on this forum, you carry the biggest chip on your shoulder against Khan, and it's beyond pathetic, childish and borderline obsession.

You even went to the extend to dig up an year and a half old article of what Khan said about Froch - Even though they've been on good terms with each other ever since.

You also once said Khan is a bad role model for kids (like other boxers shock, horror!) - But didn't comment on the likes of Hatton being a binge drinking, cocaine sniffing cheating husband. But had that been Khan, you'd have popped your jugular vein.

But hey Gomez, dont let facts get in the way of your opinions. If it helps you sleep at night that you think that im a Amir Khan Fan when im not, so be it. Now run a long and read what he has to say on Twitter and let us know how arrogant he is.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Observer, don't think Hatton was married so that tiny part may need changing
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by twenty six »

James,
You could be right.
No offence to Londoners but is that constant smell of farts down there because they all talk shit ? :wink:
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13438
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by jameswilson »

twenty six wrote:James,
You could be right.
No offence to Londoners but is that constant smell of farts down there because they all talk shit ? :wink:
I bet you like the smell of your own farts tho don't you.

It's not everyone from Sheffield I should point out. But Prince Naz, Brook, Eesham Pickering to me all seem to have fairly high voices. You know, like if they are being interviewed with the camera up close to their face I wouldn't be suprised if the camera panned out and it turned out they were grasping their groins very tightly Michael Jackson awohhhhhhhh style.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by Tomasino »

jameswilson wrote:
twenty six wrote:James,
You could be right.
No offence to Londoners but is that constant smell of farts down there because they all talk shit ? :wink:
I bet you like the smell of your own farts tho don't you.

It's not everyone from Sheffield I should point out. But Prince Naz, Brook, Eesham Pickering to me all seem to have fairly high voices. You know, like if they are being interviewed with the camera up close to their face I wouldn't be suprised if the camera panned out and it turned out they were grasping their groins very tightly Michael Jackson awohhhhhhhh style.


:DDD


Brook in particular!!
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by whiskey »

observer1 wrote:
Firstly, I don't remember commenting on his 4x4 accident, but if that is the case, that was my wrong doing and i'll own up to that.

Secondly, I'm not justifying Khan for appealing the Khan-Peterson decision. I'll be the first to say it's unsportsmanlike and he should accept it. But as it stands, He lost by a point and is upset about the two point deductions, therefore it is understandable for a boxer to do what he did. It's not the first time a Boxer has not agree with the final verdict giving him a loss. Dang, even in Don King's heydays, nearly every fighters' loss had an appeal take place afterwards.

Thirdly, Kell Brook is a solid operator, but is still far away from the next level where the likes of Khan, Maidina, Alexander, Bradley, Person, Ortiz etc. are operating. If you i'm crazy to think Brook's struggles against these guys, so be it.

The only Defense i have made of Amir Khan, and many other boxers (Both UK and NON-UK) is against double standards. There are countless other boxers who do the same as Khan if not worse inside and outside the ring. Yet people turn a blind eye to some of these names.

Fact is, of all the people on this forum, you carry the biggest chip on your shoulder against Khan, and it's beyond pathetic, childish and borderline obsession.

You even went to the extend to dig up an year and a half old article of what Khan said about Froch - Even though they've been on good terms with each other ever since.

You also once said Khan is a bad role model for kids (like other boxers shock, horror!) - But didn't comment on the likes of Hatton being a binge drinking, cocaine sniffing cheating husband. But had that been Khan, you'd have popped your jugular vein.

But hey Gomez, dont let facts get in the way of your opinions. If it helps you sleep at night that you think that im a Amir Khan Fan when im not, so be it. Now run a long and read what he has to say on Twitter and let us know how arrogant he is.
How does that worm taste? Point proven.

:TU:
bigB
Cruiserweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 08:13

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by bigB »

Firstly I see Kell regularly and he is more than capable of fighting and IMO beating Khan, nothing against Khan as I think he is a great british boxer and proved that in fights with Maidana etc

Kell hasn't had the opportunities offered to him when with Fwank and now with Matchroom and Eddie they are progressing his career at a rapid pace.

In past 3 fights in 6 months in 2011 had two higher level opponents that have been in with some of the best or current ex world champions. He has made his US debut and IMO looked very good.

Yeah he was very nervous I could tell that but he got down to business and Garlarza showed alot of heart in fighting back and continueing on and yes he was caught and TBH took the shots, Galarza has a good KO percentage yeah not against fighters as good as Brook but that could have put others down.

2012 will be the year for Brook personally and in the ring!!!!!
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by JamesH »

twenty six wrote:James,
You could be right.
No offence to Londoners but is that constant smell of farts down there because they all talk shit ? :wink:
AHHH that familiar smell you will have become accustomed too whilst lodged up the hole of any fighter that even looked at an Ingle. Hope it made you feel welcome :wink:
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by observer1 »

G0mez wrote:
observer1 wrote:
Firstly, I don't remember commenting on his 4x4 accident, but if that is the case, that was my wrong doing and i'll own up to that.

Secondly, I'm not justifying Khan for appealing the Khan-Peterson decision. I'll be the first to say it's unsportsmanlike and he should accept it. But as it stands, He lost by a point and is upset about the two point deductions, therefore it is understandable for a boxer to do what he did. It's not the first time a Boxer has not agree with the final verdict giving him a loss. Dang, even in Don King's heydays, nearly every fighters' loss had an appeal take place afterwards.

Thirdly, Kell Brook is a solid operator, but is still far away from the next level where the likes of Khan, Maidina, Alexander, Bradley, Person, Ortiz etc. are operating. If you i'm crazy to think Brook's struggles against these guys, so be it.

The only Defense i have made of Amir Khan, and many other boxers (Both UK and NON-UK) is against double standards. There are countless other boxers who do the same as Khan if not worse inside and outside the ring. Yet people turn a blind eye to some of these names.

Fact is, of all the people on this forum, you carry the biggest chip on your shoulder against Khan, and it's beyond pathetic, childish and borderline obsession.

You even went to the extend to dig up an year and a half old article of what Khan said about Froch - Even though they've been on good terms with each other ever since.

You also once said Khan is a bad role model for kids (like other boxers shock, horror!) - But didn't comment on the likes of Hatton being a binge drinking, cocaine sniffing cheating husband. But had that been Khan, you'd have popped your jugular vein.

But hey Gomez, dont let facts get in the way of your opinions. If it helps you sleep at night that you think that im a Amir Khan Fan when im not, so be it. Now run a long and read what he has to say on Twitter and let us know how arrogant he is.
How does that worm taste? Point proven.

:TU:
Only thing proben is that you're a joke ;;-)
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by twenty six »

That's whaT I love abart Southerners.
Have a pop at Northerners then bite when we have a go back.
It's all light hearted banter !!
I'm in my fifties and can still sing "We're walking in the air" in the highest key.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by JamesH »

twenty six wrote:That's whaT I love abart Southerners.
Have a pop at Northerners then bite when we have a go back.
It's all light hearted banter !!
I'm in my fifties and can still sing "We're walking in the air" in the highest key.
:lol:

You assume I'm a Southerner....

Just because you only defend or discuss the same fighters from the same area, don't assume we're all so limited. Some of us can see past the end of our own nose (even past geography sometimes!). It must be that place your lodging your nose which is scuppering your view.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by Crease »

Kell Brook has a lot to say on the subject, undoubtedly this is to try and establish a fight with Kahn somewhere down the line...

But I can't say that he's a better boxer than Kahn.
:shame: :shame: :shame: :shame: :shame:
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by twenty six »

Well you've got me there James.
It is true that I am very biased when it comes to Sheffield boxing, but I'd like to think I know a bit about boxing in general.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by jBacca »

Crease wrote:Kell Brook has a lot to say on the subject, undoubtedly this is to try and establish a fight with Kahn somewhere down the line...

But I can't say that he's a better boxer than Kahn.
:shame: :shame: :shame: :shame: :shame:

KHAN you daft fvcking noob. :witzend:

These two are simmering quite nicely. Will make for an electric fight if and when it gets made.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by whiskey »

observer1 wrote:
G0mez wrote: How does that worm taste? Point proven.

:TU:
Only thing proben is that you're a joke ;;-)
Proben ?
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by observer1 »

G0mez wrote:
observer1 wrote:
G0mez wrote: How does that worm taste? Point proven.

:TU:
Only thing proben is that you're a joke ;;-)
Proben ?
Proven*

Using Initiative is a bit much for you isn't it :OhYes:
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by gobbles »

twenty six wrote:What an arrogant ignorant tool Khan is.
Whilst it won't happen, a la Keegan I'd love it just love it if Kel smashed him to bits.
End of rant.
What an arrogant tool Brook is.

And who has he ever beaten? Jennings. Wow!

Smell the hype
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Brook blasts "amateurish chicken" Khan

Post by gobbles »

G0mez wrote:
observer1 wrote:
Your post suggests that i care whether Khan wins or not. :confused:
Nope, your constant defence of him does confirms it.

You even claimed that a man who was killed by Khan in his 4x4, wasn't actually killed by Khan, but the result of his injuries. You leapt to the defence of his criticism through the red top press of Rob Mckracken. In another thread your defending and justifying him going to the sanctioning bodies to upturn a legit loss.

Even in this thread, the mere mention of the likely outcome of Khan vs Brook had you leaping in to attack someone who dared say Khan gets walloped.

The guy wasn't killed by him. He also didn't die as a result of his injuries. That is totally untrue and libelous. He broke his leg. You just spread lies.
Post Reply