Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post Reply
Grays_Dan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 16:49

Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by Grays_Dan »

Apparently Mitchell v Ormond is off as Ormond has pulled out. Anthony Crolla couldn't agree terms for Burns.

Mitchell v Crolla would be very nice
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by earsjohn »

Grays_Dan wrote:Apparently Mitchell v Ormond is off as Ormond has pulled out. Anthony Crolla couldn't agree terms for Burns.

Mitchell v Crolla would be very nice
Can't say its a fight I'm going to miss (Mitchell v Ormond). Difficult to see how they'll get Crolla for Mitchell if there wasn't enough money on the table for Crolla v Burns.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by leforge »

earsjohn wrote:
Grays_Dan wrote:Apparently Mitchell v Ormond is off as Ormond has pulled out. Anthony Crolla couldn't agree terms for Burns.

Mitchell v Crolla would be very nice
Can't say its a fight I'm going to miss (Mitchell v Ormond). Difficult to see how they'll get Crolla for Mitchell if there wasn't enough money on the table for Crolla v Burns.
Do any of the bills hold it.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by pyenest77 »

I know it is nature of the beast with boxing that there are pull outs, but these bills on the allegedly channel dont seem to EVER stay together!!!
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

When was the last time we had an FW card "as advertised"? Have we actually had one since they went pay? (I'm not counting Selby v Simpson as that was advertised on Sky)
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by DavidPayne »

Come on guys this has been happening since Robin Hood was in borstal.

Advertise a mega card. Put on a mediocre card. This happens a lot, then one card holds just to keep the faith.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by gobbles »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:When was the last time we had an FW card "as advertised"? Have we actually had one since they went pay? (I'm not counting Selby v Simpson as that was advertised on Sky)

Burns v Katsidis?
Cleverly v Bellew?

Last two big shows then
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by earsjohn »

gobbles wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:When was the last time we had an FW card "as advertised"? Have we actually had one since they went pay? (I'm not counting Selby v Simpson as that was advertised on Sky)

Burns v Katsidis?
Cleverly v Bellew?

Last two big shows then
Burns v Katsidis was originally to have Chisora v Olubamiwo on the undercard - neither were on.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by bripez »

Grays_Dan wrote:Apparently Mitchell v Ormond is off as Ormond has pulled out.
Thanks for the tip off mate - I was just about to subscribe to BN to watch this.

I think I will save my money now !! ....... :lol:
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

earsjohn wrote:
gobbles wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:When was the last time we had an FW card "as advertised"? Have we actually had one since they went pay? (I'm not counting Selby v Simpson as that was advertised on Sky)

Burns v Katsidis?
Cleverly v Bellew?

Last two big shows then
Burns v Katsidis was originally to have Chisora v Olubamiwo on the undercard - neither were on.
So...October 15th?...3 months ago? O_o
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by leforge »

I offered Dean Powell my fighter TBC he fed up with TBA getting the fight!
aanices
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 Jan 2012, 22:53

Re: Mitchell v Ormond is off

Post by aanices »

I was just about to subscribe to BN to watch this.

Image
Post Reply