allegedly
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Allegedly Channel
That's it, Orb.
Once BN starts showing its own excellent bills then Allegedly will own the rights.
Once BN starts showing its own excellent bills then Allegedly will own the rights.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Out of interest are the repeats of old SN shows on BN with the original ITV commentary etc? On FW's website he used to show recent fights but with different commentary which made it quite dull.stujones wrote:Its a good question, it seems a complex issue. Even though boxing on TV ends with a copyright to the Broadcaster, it doesn't seem to be that easy. I remember Sportnetwork withdrawing a lot of youtube versions of old ITV "big fight" clips (even for those clips that played the fantastic theme tune) - it stated the rights were owned by SportsNetwork.Dirk Kelly wrote:Who actually owns the rights to all those Sports Network fights with Naz, Joe C etc?
Is it Frank or would it have been his promotional company, Sports Network and when this went into administration did someone buy them?
Stupid question but I take it boxers don't get a royalty every time one of their old fights is shown like actors do? Wonder if boxers will try for this in the future when channels will be showing old fights in a continous reel.
However, don't really see any "thanks to" credit when ITV chose to repeat or show clips from old boxing shows.
Allegedly channel has shown a fair amount of repeat from the Sport Network archive (early Khan fights etc).
BN really need to capatilise on their USP - they are a dedicated boxing channel! This is a chance to have tonnes of exclusive interviews with boxers, trainers, fans etc. Short documentaries, fly on the wall, boxers in focus etc.
Re: Allegedly Channel
I've no idea how the contract stacks up, but one thing's for certain - FW doesn't own the rights to rebroadcast what SKY broadcast, they alone broadcast that. That's why his youtube channel has their own in-house commentary.twenty six wrote:That's it, Orb.
Once BN starts showing its own excellent bills then Allegedly will own the rights.
Obviously he "owns" the content that SKY (for example) broadcast so I imagine somewhere deep in their contracts he has the "rights" to that.
I remember re-watching Skelton/Rogan on CH456 in the early days before it was common knowledge that it was a FW channel and I genuinely cannot remember if it had the original SKY commentary on it. I think I would say not, but don't quote me.
Re: Allegedly Channel
They show Sky fights (Khan vs Fagin etc) with the original Sky commentary team.
They show ITV fights (Khan vs St Claire, Mac vs Braithwaite etc) with the original ITV team I would imagine (well its Rawling and McKenzie - I guess they could over dub).
Mmmm..... not saying anything, but definately Khan vs Fagin end credits (on its original broadcast) says copyright BSkyB on it.
They show ITV fights (Khan vs St Claire, Mac vs Braithwaite etc) with the original ITV team I would imagine (well its Rawling and McKenzie - I guess they could over dub).
Mmmm..... not saying anything, but definately Khan vs Fagin end credits (on its original broadcast) says copyright BSkyB on it.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Exact same scenario with Matchroom/Barry Hearn and ITV and ProBox back in the early 90s etc.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Sorry, care to expand? Wasn't Probox a "Matchroom" product? I didn't watch probox at the time as we only had terrestial - but I have seen Probox repeats and at the end it says copyright Matchroom. It seems to be produced by Matchroom team.orbtastic wrote:Exact same scenario with Matchroom/Barry Hearn and ITV and ProBox back in the early 90s etc.
I don't think these highlights that were on allegedly are produced by allegedly themselves.
Re: Allegedly Channel
ProBox would show fights that ITV previously broadcast.
I don't doubt that CH456 have showed verbatim SKY shows but they are all relatively recent so that may be something in his last contract with them, as he probably already had one eye on going ahead with that. It would also explain why older Sp*rts Netw*rk shows haven't been shown on BN as people are suggesting should be done.
Like I said - check out his YouTube channel, it's all got SN team commentary on it, plus all the interviews etc from the girl who works for them.
I don't doubt that CH456 have showed verbatim SKY shows but they are all relatively recent so that may be something in his last contract with them, as he probably already had one eye on going ahead with that. It would also explain why older Sp*rts Netw*rk shows haven't been shown on BN as people are suggesting should be done.
Like I said - check out his YouTube channel, it's all got SN team commentary on it, plus all the interviews etc from the girl who works for them.
Re: Allegedly Channel
But they have been albeit more sporadically and not exactly from the Eubank era. Braithwaite vs Maccarinelli was a SN show and on ITV.orbtastic wrote:ProBox would show fights that ITV previously broadcast.
I don't doubt that CH456 have showed verbatim SKY shows but they are all relatively recent so that may be something in his last contract with them, as he probably already had one eye on going ahead with that. It would also explain why older Sp*rts Netw*rk shows haven't been shown on BN as people are suggesting should be done.
Like I said - check out his YouTube channel, it's all got SN team commentary on it, plus all the interviews etc from the girl who works for them.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Like I say, no idea what his contracts say.
I can't actually remember who the ITV commentary team were at the time but Rawling/Duke sounds about right.
I don't think I'm either disagreeing or agreeing.
As several people have said already, it will be a rights issue.
I can't actually remember who the ITV commentary team were at the time but Rawling/Duke sounds about right.
I don't think I'm either disagreeing or agreeing.
As several people have said already, it will be a rights issue.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Nooooooooooooo, hence why i never signed up to the channelTommy Gunn13 wrote:Did you really believe they were going to put 2 on a weekJosh1111 wrote:But they promised 2 a week which they have failed to deliverjessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months
-
jtourettes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 822
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24
Re: Allegedly Channel
If Only BoxingChat had been online recently, I'm sure he would've answered these questions.
Re: Allegedly Channel
I didn't expect anything between Xmas and say the 21st of January anyway, I'm confident they will have two live shows again soon, I know some of the fights are not what everyone's hoped for but I'm giving it a chance until may.Josh1111 wrote:But they promised 2 a week which they have failed to deliverjessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months
Re: Allegedly Channel
jtourettes wrote:If Only BoxingChat had been online recently, I'm sure he would've answered these questions.
Re: Allegedly Channel
The quality if the uk shows in next few months is very poor!jessi wrote:I didn't expect anything between Xmas and say the 21st of January anyway, I'm confident they will have two live shows again soon, I know some of the fights are not what everyone's hoped for but I'm giving it a chance until may.Josh1111 wrote:But they promised 2 a week which they have failed to deliverjessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months
Re: Allegedly Channel
There was talk at the start that they were going to be screening MMA and getting hold of De La Hoya's video archives or something, if I remember correctly. Even some old documentaries would spice things up a bit, or small hall show footage. Many small hall shows are filmed by independent cameras. I remember at a Hyland show in Dublin a couple of years ago they were selling the DVDs of their previous show at the door on a table for 5 euro, so the footage is available and I'm sure an agreement could be made that would suit all parties. Possibly...
Re: Allegedly Channel
Then why start the subscriptions in november and have no fights for 2 or 3 months? surely thats a con job.jessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months
Re: Allegedly Channel
Bingo! that is what people were expecting instead its repeats of fights from the last 3 months and no live boxing.dbf wrote:Out of interest are the repeats of old SN shows on BN with the original ITV commentary etc? On FW's website he used to show recent fights but with different commentary which made it quite dull.stujones wrote:Its a good question, it seems a complex issue. Even though boxing on TV ends with a copyright to the Broadcaster, it doesn't seem to be that easy. I remember Sportnetwork withdrawing a lot of youtube versions of old ITV "big fight" clips (even for those clips that played the fantastic theme tune) - it stated the rights were owned by SportsNetwork.Dirk Kelly wrote:Who actually owns the rights to all those Sports Network fights with Naz, Joe C etc?
Is it Frank or would it have been his promotional company, Sports Network and when this went into administration did someone buy them?
Stupid question but I take it boxers don't get a royalty every time one of their old fights is shown like actors do? Wonder if boxers will try for this in the future when channels will be showing old fights in a continous reel.
However, don't really see any "thanks to" credit when ITV chose to repeat or show clips from old boxing shows.
Allegedly channel has shown a fair amount of repeat from the Sport Network archive (early Khan fights etc).
BN really need to capatilise on their USP - they are a dedicated boxing channel! This is a chance to have tonnes of exclusive interviews with boxers, trainers, fans etc. Short documentaries, fly on the wall, boxers in focus etc.
It would be so easy to do as well, they dont have to do anything big budget just get some interviews like jayne couch does (or just hire jayne couch); boxers with their hair down having a laugh, the type of non staged interviews you dont get on the normal sports channels. Get a few sparring sessions on tape and some docs on the training process. Do some day in the life of Billy Joe saunders, Heffron, chisora etc docs its so easy to do yet its not done.
Last edited by Finn on 07 Jan 2012, 06:18, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Allegedly Channel
In the very early days the only place you could watch Matchroom's bills was on SCREENSPORT in the late 80s / early 90s, which later got gobbled by Eurosport.
Some of the Eubank fights were broadcast simultaneously by Screensport / Eurosport & ITV. Trust me, I'm old enough to remember. I used to love watching these shows with my Dad on a Tuesday night.
Some of the Eubank fights were broadcast simultaneously by Screensport / Eurosport & ITV. Trust me, I'm old enough to remember. I used to love watching these shows with my Dad on a Tuesday night.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Allegedly Channel
....you're a real boxing fan.DavidPayne wrote:If you put your head in a lions mouth and you look like a gullible Gazelle....
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Allegedly Channel
Its the ultimate catch 22; allegedly can only attract top class opponents if the channel picks up subscribers. Fans are not willing to pay money for sub par fights so we're just stuck with it until the channel ceases to exist and allegedly goes back to Sky with his tail between his legs!
Re: Allegedly Channel
i thought that too, i wanted to watch cleverly v bomber so had to do it, im looking forward to chisora v vitali and gavins return in the next couple of months, like i said before im going to give it till may and revaluate.kingfinn wrote:Then why start the subscriptions in november and have no fights for 2 or 3 months? surely thats a con job.jessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months
Re: Allegedly Channel
Chisora v Vitali going to be a one sided beating. Povetkin v Huck on 25th is there best show. I imagine Gavin might fight the guy who beat Dean Byrne.jessi wrote:i thought that too, i wanted to watch cleverly v bomber so had to do it, im looking forward to chisora v vitali and gavins return in the next couple of months, like i said before im going to give it till may and revaluate.kingfinn wrote:Then why start the subscriptions in november and have no fights for 2 or 3 months? surely thats a con job.jessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months
Re: Allegedly Channel
clev v bomber was on when the channel was free, which makes the whole situation even worst.jessi wrote:i thought that too, i wanted to watch cleverly v bomber so had to do it, im looking forward to chisora v vitali and gavins return in the next couple of months, like i said before im going to give it till may and revaluate.kingfinn wrote:Then why start the subscriptions in november and have no fights for 2 or 3 months? surely thats a con job.jessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months
Re: Allegedly Channel
I think chisora will surprise a few people, huck v povetkin should be good, so will gavin against the Frenchman, there you go, 2012 is up and runningleforge wrote:Chisora v Vitali going to be a one sided beating. Povetkin v Huck on 25th is there best show. I imagine Gavin might fight the guy who beat Dean Byrne.jessi wrote:i thought that too, i wanted to watch cleverly v bomber so had to do it, im looking forward to chisora v vitali and gavins return in the next couple of months, like i said before im going to give it till may and revaluate.kingfinn wrote: Then why start the subscriptions in november and have no fights for 2 or 3 months? surely thats a con job.
Re: Allegedly Channel
So it was, ok so I don't have much for my argument, I still think £10 per month isn't too bad, of course £5 per month would be better but would they get more than double the subscribers ?kingfinn wrote:clev v bomber was on when the channel was free, which makes the whole situation even worst.jessi wrote:i thought that too, i wanted to watch cleverly v bomber so had to do it, im looking forward to chisora v vitali and gavins return in the next couple of months, like i said before im going to give it till may and revaluate.kingfinn wrote: Then why start the subscriptions in november and have no fights for 2 or 3 months? surely thats a con job.