Rahman - Barrett

Post Reply
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Rahman - Barrett

Post by Neri »

Are we not getting Rahman - Barrett show televised here? Nothing i can see mentioning it in BN
Smit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 451
Joined: 02 Jul 2004, 07:31

Post by Smit »

Not on any TV stations nope... Might be streamed over the internet on one of those sites but that's it

Rahman to win btw
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Post by Neri »

Sad news on the television coverage. On yahoo chat, 'In The Ring' room, there are loads of boxing fans present when a good show is on . Sometimes yanks throws their webcam on so people can watch the fight.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Lol, what a crafty little idea :lol: I like it. I want to know why it is PPV at all...Rahman V Barrett, i mean would you pay £30 or whatever the English equivalent is to watch it, even with Mayorga on the undercard. A rip off.
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Post by Neri »

steve689 wrote:Lol, what a crafty little idea :lol: I like it. I want to know why it is PPV at all...Rahman V Barrett, i mean would you pay £30 or whatever the English equivalent is to watch it, even with Mayorga on the undercard. A rip off.
Agreed not a quality card at all is it. With the webcam thing, bear in mind you might have to be nice to a yank or two and this could prove difficult. :lol:
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Anyone know what time this fight starts British time?
Owain
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 252
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 21:27

Post by Owain »

2 a.m.
split_decision
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 16:11

Post by split_decision »

Owain wrote:2 a.m.
Show starts 2am but the main event will likely be around 4
jeej
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 936
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 15:18

Post by jeej »

Rahman won UD.
Exile
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 239
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 13:55

Post by Exile »

Sounds like it was dull as dishwater. Usual heavyweight dross :oops:
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Yeah i'm glad i fell asleep watching No Angels now 8) Mmmm Kate the nurse :oops:
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

did anyone watch it on the webcam. :D

vitali will do a number on rahman. vitali is head and shoulders above everyone both in height and talent. :TU:
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

I tend to agree, a lot of people are critical of his heart and stamina etc but there doesn't seem anyone else worthy to claim to be No. 1. Klitschko might be tall and unorthodox but he is very effective at what he does and i just see him pulling back off that Rahman right hand and counter punching him to a stoppage win.
nas7232
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 101
Joined: 24 Jul 2005, 16:24

Post by nas7232 »

barret could of ko'ed rachman in the last round, his corner were well pissed - rachman was wobbling about and barret was clinching. Imagine vitali having that opportunity.

It was a pretty dull fight, barret running away too much.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

On the subject of this fight, i am not up to date with the whole alphabet regime so how come Rahman had to fight Barrett at all in a "final eliminator"?

Wasn't Rahman scheduled to fight Klitschko like twice or something and Klitschko pulled out with injury? And then while waiting for Klitschko to recover Rahman has to fight Barrett? What if Rahman had lost? Does he then lose his right to fight Klitschko who pulled out of their fight with injury :o Someone help me out cause i am confused :lol:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

steve689 wrote:On the subject of this fight, i am not up to date with the whole alphabet regime so how come Rahman had to fight Barrett at all in a "final eliminator"?

Wasn't Rahman scheduled to fight Klitschko like twice or something and Klitschko pulled out with injury? And then while waiting for Klitschko to recover Rahman has to fight Barrett? What if Rahman had lost? Does he then lose his right to fight Klitschko who pulled out of their fight with injury :o Someone help me out cause i am confused :lol:
It was for the interim belt, Klitchsko now has a certain number of days to fight Rahman or Rahman will be the champion proper.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Cheers Stu, my alphabet politics knowledge is not what it should be. I am sure there was something to be gained by Rahman but didn't realise this was the case :TU:
Post Reply