chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post Reply
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by rhino222 »

what time is it on lads?
Benelio
Cruiserweight
Posts: 601
Joined: 02 May 2011, 05:57

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Benelio »

also viewable on the channel's website right now
Srebmun
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1358
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 10:23

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Srebmun »

Was a pretty good press conference, Del Boy as funny as usual. I'm just Joe Public and was able to go in, I work in Marylebone and just happened to be walking by when they arrived.

Del Boy reckons he's gonna do him in 8 :bag:
Srebmun
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1358
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 10:23

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Srebmun »

Took a few pics too, just with my blackberry so not the best quality.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by leforge »

Shame this fight going to be watched by one nan & his dog on allegedly! How has chisora got a shot last month he was not in WBC top 40 !
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Chisora has proved himself to be a tough nut thus far, has he even been hurt in a fight? Unfortunately this means a long painful beating for him.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

There was no real trash talking from Chisora which was a suprise but he did admit he'll only kiss Ironfist if he has a shave.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Quixall »

All looks too friendly to me.............

It's certainly a contrast to the Haye - Klitschko fight, t-shirts of decapitated people and Wlad's "Magic hand"

Bit of a joke really, Chisora loses to Fury and Helenius and gets a shot :roll:

Vitali will end the fight when he wants to, which could be as early as the second round.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by crusader »

Chisora beat the crap out of Helenius. That fight shouldn't be mentioned as a reason why Chisora is undeserving of a title shot.
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Finch »

crusader wrote:Chisora beat the crap out of Helenius. That fight shouldn't be mentioned as a reason why Chisora is undeserving of a title shot.
It should because he lost. Whether that was the right decision or not is very much debatable.
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by nobby_nobbins »

Finch wrote:
crusader wrote:Chisora beat the crap out of Helenius. That fight shouldn't be mentioned as a reason why Chisora is undeserving of a title shot.
It should because he lost. Whether that was the right decision or not is very much debatable.
It's not at all debatable to nearly everyone who actually watched it.
Last edited by nobby_nobbins on 09 Jan 2012, 19:10, edited 1 time in total.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Quixall »

crusader wrote:Chisora beat the crap out of Helenius. That fight shouldn't be mentioned as a reason why Chisora is undeserving of a title shot.
I wouldn't say he beat the crap out of Helenius, but i agree that Chisora should have got the decision and the win. However, he lost to Tyson Fury before that fight, so on that basis he shouldn't be getting any title shot. Vitali just wants easy paydays and Chisora is just supplying another in the merry circus that is the heavyweight division.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by crusader »

Finch wrote:
crusader wrote:Chisora beat the crap out of Helenius. That fight shouldn't be mentioned as a reason why Chisora is undeserving of a title shot.
It should because he lost. Whether that was the right decision or not is very much debatable.
On what basis did Helenius deserve to win? Was he more accurate? Was he landing harder punches? Was he landing more punches? Was he busier? Was he dictating the action and looking like the boss? Absolutely not is the answer to each question; throughout the fight Chisora had a clear advantage in all of these respects. It was effective agression vs ineffective aggresion, and the former should hold much more weight in scoring than the latter.

Too much attention is paid to official results, which often (such as in this case) don't reflect what happened in the ring. An unfair result shouldn't make Chisora less deserving of a title shot than he would be if a fair result had been rendered.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by milpool »

A British fighter fighting for a world title against a Klit and I doubt anyone other than the hardcore boxing fans will know of this fight taking place.
A far cry from Wlad v Haye...
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Captain Hook »

This will be like Williams v Klit for me.... brave Delboy v hard-hitting Vitali

At least he'll give it a go

It does look mighty friendly, but I can't see Dereck running away all night. He'll show ambition and bravery in losing a wide decision IMO
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Bloody hell, this has to be the friendliest press conference in history. You'd think they were going caravanning in the lake district together rather than preparing to beat seven shades-o-shite out of one another.

Weird!
Terminator666
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1665
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Terminator666 »

I agree-they look like long lost buddies meeting up for the firsst time in years LOL.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by loaded_gloves »

Chisora by decision, there I said it.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Quixall »

loaded_gloves wrote:Chisora by decision, there I said it.
Caesar was just a farmer and never saw military action......................there i said it :DDD
Karl Jade
Cruiserweight
Posts: 734
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 16:40

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Karl Jade »

David Price was sporting a pretty bad black eye courtesy of Chisora today.
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by exittored »

leforge wrote:Shame this fight going to be watched by one nan & his dog on Allegedly channel! How has chisora got a shot last month he was not in WBC top 40 !
Right on both fronts....shameful.

Does Box notion even have 5,000 subs yet?
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Finch »

crusader wrote:
Finch wrote:
crusader wrote:Chisora beat the crap out of Helenius. That fight shouldn't be mentioned as a reason why Chisora is undeserving of a title shot.
It should because he lost. Whether that was the right decision or not is very much debatable.
On what basis did Helenius deserve to win? Was he more accurate? Was he landing harder punches? Was he landing more punches? Was he busier? Was he dictating the action and looking like the boss? Absolutely not is the answer to each question; throughout the fight Chisora had a clear advantage in all of these respects. It was effective agression vs ineffective aggresion, and the former should hold much more weight in scoring than the latter.

Too much attention is paid to official results, which often (such as in this case) don't reflect what happened in the ring. An unfair result shouldn't make Chisora less deserving of a title shot than he would be if a fair result had been rendered.
On what basis did I say Helanius deserved to win? I'm simply stating a fact, he lost, however I thought he won at a canter but those that matter thought otherwise.

Having lost two of his three last fights, and the one he won being against a bum, of course he's undeserving. However, had the Helenius result gone the other way, which it should have, he would be deserving. It's a fine line, but that fact is, he's undeserving based on the facts.
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by nobby_nobbins »

Finch wrote: On what basis did I say Helanius deserved to win? I'm simply stating a fact, he lost, however I thought he won at a canter but those that matter thought otherwise.
If those that thought otherwise were obviously wrong then they don't matter. If the rightful winner is the one who gets rewarded then it removes the incentive for dodgy decisions. That's my take on it anyway.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by crusader »

Finch wrote:
crusader wrote:
Finch wrote: It should because he lost. Whether that was the right decision or not is very much debatable.
On what basis did Helenius deserve to win? Was he more accurate? Was he landing harder punches? Was he landing more punches? Was he busier? Was he dictating the action and looking like the boss? Absolutely not is the answer to each question; throughout the fight Chisora had a clear advantage in all of these respects. It was effective agression vs ineffective aggresion, and the former should hold much more weight in scoring than the latter.

Too much attention is paid to official results, which often (such as in this case) don't reflect what happened in the ring. An unfair result shouldn't make Chisora less deserving of a title shot than he would be if a fair result had been rendered.
On what basis did I say Helanius deserved to win? I'm simply stating a fact, he lost, however I thought he won at a canter but those that matter thought otherwise.

Having lost two of his three last fights, and the one he won being against a bum, of course he's undeserving. However, had the Helenius result gone the other way, which it should have, he would be deserving. It's a fine line, but that fact is, he's undeserving based on the facts.
You said 'Whether that was the right decision or not is very much debatable.' If the result was debatable there must be some basis on which Helenius deserved to win, and I was questioning what that basis is. I didn't say anything about who you thought deserved to win.

The 'facts' you refer to are nothing more than an official outcome rendered by incompetent judges. It is also a fact that Chisora outworked Helenius, outlanded Helenius, and so on (check my other post). Basing merit solely on official results legitimates, to some extent, those results arrived at by through incompetence and corruption.
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: chirosa klitschko press conference london

Post by Craig14 »

milpool wrote:A British fighter fighting for a world title against a Klit and I doubt anyone other than the hardcore boxing fans will know of this fight taking place.
A far cry from Wlad v Haye...
It made the sport pages in New Zealand's national paper. Robin Relient an all.
Post Reply