Excellent point.Diamond WEAPON wrote:Tyson sure as eff wasn't getting draws or losing on points to MWs and LHWs like several other Champs. His "tepid" opposition early on was basically the same types of guys Larry Holmes gets his dick sucked for out pointing and Mike massacred them like a bear catching fish.
Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
I dont think Tyson was any more convincing against guys than Holmes was, he just fought differently. For his style of Boxing, Holmes was just as comprehensive in victory as Tyson was.
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
Diamond WEAPON wrote:He does for me. Sure, post-prison there was a lot of wasted talent there but people make too big a deal off of exalting a lot of past-ATGs opposition as well. Tyson sure as eff wasn't getting draws or losing on points to MWs and LHWs like several other Champs. His "tepid" opposition early on was basically the same types of guys Larry Holmes gets his dick sucked for out pointing and Mike massacred them like a bear catching fish.
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
Yes.
For me Tyson is a guarantee for the All-Time top 10 Heavyweights. He dominated the Heavyweight Division in a way that few others have done...
A few times in the past I've read people comparing Tysons' Heavyweight reign to Lewis Heavyweight reign.
And I would say with no hesitation, that Tyson's was much more impressive...
Tyson dispatched his opponents in impressive fashion and unified three of the Heavyweight titles - no champion nor top contender could last the distance with Mike in his prime (1986-89).
Whereas Lewis didn't seek out and beat the other World Champions, inseatd he allowed Holyfield to come to him and took Holyfield's titles in a snatch-and-grab win.
I always found Lewis fights boring to watch - with his defensive long-jab style.
He did not defeat his opponents as convicingly as Mike did.
And to be honest, there are still question marks all over Lewis career... Did Holyfield win the first fight?
Why did he not face Tyson nin the early 90s?
Why did he run from giving Vitali an immediate rematch?
So if anything, I would say Tyson definitely gets in before Lewis.

For me Tyson is a guarantee for the All-Time top 10 Heavyweights. He dominated the Heavyweight Division in a way that few others have done...
A few times in the past I've read people comparing Tysons' Heavyweight reign to Lewis Heavyweight reign.
And I would say with no hesitation, that Tyson's was much more impressive...
Tyson dispatched his opponents in impressive fashion and unified three of the Heavyweight titles - no champion nor top contender could last the distance with Mike in his prime (1986-89).
Whereas Lewis didn't seek out and beat the other World Champions, inseatd he allowed Holyfield to come to him and took Holyfield's titles in a snatch-and-grab win.
I always found Lewis fights boring to watch - with his defensive long-jab style.
He did not defeat his opponents as convicingly as Mike did.
And to be honest, there are still question marks all over Lewis career... Did Holyfield win the first fight?
Why did he not face Tyson nin the early 90s?
Why did he run from giving Vitali an immediate rematch?
So if anything, I would say Tyson definitely gets in before Lewis.
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
I haven't made my list recently, but I figure Mike would either come in somewhere between 10-14 on my list.
Ali, Louis, Marciano, Holyfield, Foreman, Holmes, Frazier, Lennox Lewis are all clearly ahead of him, and I would personally rank Sonny Liston, and Jack Dempsey ahead of him as well.
Ali, Louis, Marciano, Holyfield, Foreman, Holmes, Frazier, Lennox Lewis are all clearly ahead of him, and I would personally rank Sonny Liston, and Jack Dempsey ahead of him as well.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
[quote="Crease"]Tyson dispatched his opponents in impressive fashion and unified three of the Heavyweight titles - no champion nor top contender could last the distance with Mike in his prime (1986-89).
[quote]
Quick Tillis, Bonehugger & tony Tucker would disagree with this.
[quote]
Quick Tillis, Bonehugger & tony Tucker would disagree with this.
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
Top 20Goodnight, Irene wrote:Where would you have him?bollox wrote:Not a chance in hell
He cleaned out a division which at the time was full of fat druggies. He beat an old Holmes. No big deal. He beat a great lightheavy in Spinks. No big deal. Then he crumbled when someone stood up to his bullying
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
Maybe i should have elaborated. But i certainly agree that hindsight is essential. I was referring that in hindsight, we found out how much of a joke things were in the "Tyson Camp" predominately most of his career, especially post prison.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Hindsight is essential in evaluating a career. Are people supposed to rank Boxers off of their predictions instead of the results? I always laugh when someone uses that.observer1 wrote:Well hindsight is a wonderful thing. Really don't know why people keep asking the same questions they did then.Goodnight, Irene wrote:I just find it pretty damning that Tyson would take seven years to get a title shot, beat absolutely NOBODY for ten years running, and not have it judged against him.
He couldve gone after Foreman, gone after Moorer, gone after Bowe or Lewis (especially Lewis). Instead, he just made a series of cynical cash-grabs, and as I say, this didnt go on for four or five fights, it was the entire post-prison era.
The "Upset of the century" when Tyson vs Douglas turns out to be tame considering the way Tyson's personal life unraveled. He was a train wreck waiting to happen.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
No argument there, he was always like that. The excuses from fans for the Douglas loss never cease to irritate me. I don't think any version of Tyson wins that night.
-
misterpunch
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1252
- Joined: 13 Jan 2012, 17:48
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
just outside the 10 for me.
joe louis
ali
foreman
marciano
tunney
holyfield
lennox
dempsey
liston
frazier
all these guys get the nod over mike when i weigh it all up - great to watch though
joe louis
ali
foreman
marciano
tunney
holyfield
lennox
dempsey
liston
frazier
all these guys get the nod over mike when i weigh it all up - great to watch though
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
Not to take away from Douglas and his performance, but like i mentioned earlier, it's pretty obvious from hindsight was that Tyson was a loss waiting to happen.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No argument there, he was always like that. The excuses from fans for the Douglas loss never cease to irritate me. I don't think any version of Tyson wins that night.
Anyone who was not going to fold within the first 6 rounds would have given Tyson alot of trouble in the latter rounds considering the state Tyson was in, who even sacked one of his trainers because he kept telling him to do his running. (Seriously).
Even watching him, he seems sluggish and lacking in his movement and combo's after 1 or 2 rounds. He was very much like the Tyson everyone got used to Post-Prison. Looking for that 1 KO shot to win, obviously, it didn't come.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
He looked just as sluggish at 19 years old vs Tillis, a fight I think could've been a draw without the flash KD.observer1 wrote:Not to take away from Douglas and his performance, but like i mentioned earlier, it's pretty obvious from hindsight was that Tyson was a loss waiting to happen.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No argument there, he was always like that. The excuses from fans for the Douglas loss never cease to irritate me. I don't think any version of Tyson wins that night.
Anyone who was not going to fold within the first 6 rounds would have given Tyson alot of trouble in the latter rounds considering the state Tyson was in, who even sacked one of his trainers because he kept telling him to do his running. (Seriously).
Even watching him, he seems sluggish and lacking in his movement and combo's after 1 or 2 rounds. He was very much like the Tyson everyone got used to Post-Prison. Looking for that 1 KO shot to win, obviously, it didn't come.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
That's exactly what I was going to say. Tyson's head movement was part of his robotic attack, that went away for the most part against anybody that was using a consistently hard jab and or movement. Buster whipped his ass from the opening seconds. Mike wasn't badly out of shape or anymore mentally challenged than he usually was. The issue was his opponent, just like it was when Evander owned him.dempseyfire wrote:He looked just as sluggish at 19 years old vs Tillis, a fight I think could've been a draw without the flash KD.observer1 wrote:Not to take away from Douglas and his performance, but like i mentioned earlier, it's pretty obvious from hindsight was that Tyson was a loss waiting to happen.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No argument there, he was always like that. The excuses from fans for the Douglas loss never cease to irritate me. I don't think any version of Tyson wins that night.
Anyone who was not going to fold within the first 6 rounds would have given Tyson alot of trouble in the latter rounds considering the state Tyson was in, who even sacked one of his trainers because he kept telling him to do his running. (Seriously).
Even watching him, he seems sluggish and lacking in his movement and combo's after 1 or 2 rounds. He was very much like the Tyson everyone got used to Post-Prison. Looking for that 1 KO shot to win, obviously, it didn't come.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
observer1 wrote:Not to take away from Douglas and his performance, but like i mentioned earlier, it's pretty obvious from hindsight was that Tyson was a loss waiting to happen.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:No argument there, he was always like that. The excuses from fans for the Douglas loss never cease to irritate me. I don't think any version of Tyson wins that night.
Hindsight won't take me to Buster Douglas fighting like that. Mike would have lost his next fight to Evander anyway, but I knew that then. Mike's flaws were always the same. Very low ring IQ, a jab took away his defense & he didn't know how to fight on the inside past a couple of programmed combinations. They just weren't easy flaws to exploit for just anyone.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
A top 15? yes
A top 10? no
A top 10? no
-
flatnoseflynn
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 319
- Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 16:42
Re: Is Mike Tyson A Top-10 All-Time HW?
Top Ten easy! People will still be talking about Tyson for decades to come. That must say something about the man and his ability. Under achieved? probably! but in his prime he was one fierce MF! without a doubt. 