Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
what a piss take, how can it go to cards in a non title fight!!!
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
oh i see fair enoughdondada wrote:Because those are the rules that have been in place for about a year now.punchers chance wrote:No one from the Board will come on and explain why it went to the cards in a non title fight. Pretty poor that
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2010/exclus ... -cuts-rule
That piece was done months before it got changed but I think it's accurate.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13319
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Larry looked much improved, showed a decent defence there. Now he's got that tricky first fight back out of the way, he can give it a real shot this year. Make or break.
Who's his very intense cornerman ?
Rawling tried a couple of lame jokes about Larry serving time, which showed a lack of class. Enzo put him right though.
Who's his very intense cornerman ?
Rawling tried a couple of lame jokes about Larry serving time, which showed a lack of class. Enzo put him right though.
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Any links please chaps, usual guru is prompting me to install a plugin???
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
i had a bet on the fight not to go the distance? have i won this bet?the truth wrote:what a piss take, how can it go to cards in a non title fight!!!
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Still think that?MachoMan09 wrote:Shane will win this fight. I said it, it must be true.
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
yeah you have.bigped wrote:i had a bet on the fight not to go the distance? have i won this bet?the truth wrote:what a piss take, how can it go to cards in a non title fight!!!
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Super shot -Shane did well to survive there
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Good fight so far.
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Shane doing very well in 2nd.MachoMan09 wrote:Keep the faith.exittored wrote:Still think that?MachoMan09 wrote:Shane will win this fight. I said it, it must be true.
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
alot more interesting than Williams previous fight.exittored wrote:Good fight so far.
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Shane needs to throw more uppercuts...thats the key for him in this fight.
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Mcphillbin won 3rd.
I have it McPhill 2rds to 1.
I have it McPhill 2rds to 1.
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
neither of these guys should be fighting for british, should be dickinson, askin or dunstan in there battling it out
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
There's no if about it. It was changed. And yes, they should.MachoMan09 wrote:If this ruling has been changed, they should probably consider updating the rules of boxing they have on their website.dondada wrote:Because those are the rules that have been in place for about a year now.punchers chance wrote:No one from the Board will come on and explain why it went to the cards in a non title fight. Pretty poor that
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2010/exclus ... -cuts-rule
That piece was done months before it got changed but I think it's accurate.
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Williams wins 4th.
2-2
2-2
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
what about the knockdown?exittored wrote:Williams wins 4th.
2-2
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
So Shinny Bayaar should have kept his title vs Paul Edwards on a technical draw - oh hang on... it is at the referees discretion! ![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Fights gone a bit downhill.
tough 5th rd to score as nothing much happened but will give it to Williams.
3-2 williams.
tough 5th rd to score as nothing much happened but will give it to Williams.
3-2 williams.
-
damianhucker1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
ive got mcphilbin vs williams level after 5
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
From memory, the rule came in effective January 2011. So had the fight happened three weeks later, yes, he would have kept his belt.Fat Git wrote:So Shinny Bayaar should have kept his title vs Paul Edwards on a technical draw - oh hang on... it is at the referees discretion!
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Just scoring rds at moment and then add it all up at end.yid14 wrote:what about the knockdown?exittored wrote:Williams wins 4th.
2-2
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Also, the rule hasn't been enforced - I bet my dinner money that tonights fight was the first time the rule has been enforced.MachoMan09 wrote:Fair dos. Do you know how they went about informing licence holders of the change? Like I say, the rules on their website do not concur with what your piece sets out; which may help explain away the confusion.dondada wrote:There's no if about it. It was changed. And yes, they should.MachoMan09 wrote: If this ruling has been changed, they should probably consider updating the rules of boxing they have on their website.
-
plymouthskinhead
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 119
- Joined: 02 Nov 2010, 05:03
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
Fat Git wrote:I never knew fights went to the scorecard in an 8 rounder.
Larry showed some neat skills in there - nice one!
Are you serious? He was lunging in and turning his head away as he jabbed. Thought that was a shocker, not impressed with his defensive skills either. He even said after he'd sparred better.
-
el_grande_mauro_mina
- Lightweight
- Posts: 11215
- Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54
Re: Sexton-Olubamiwo 13th Jan - inc. some undercard spoilers
So, according to your article in July the 2010 - the law wasn't imminent?dondada wrote:From memory, the rule came in effective January 2011. So had the fight happened three weeks later, yes, he would have kept his belt.Fat Git wrote:So Shinny Bayaar should have kept his title vs Paul Edwards on a technical draw - oh hang on... it is at the referees discretion!
Last edited by el_grande_mauro_mina on 13 Jan 2012, 19:04, edited 1 time in total.