Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post Reply
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15690
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by elmersalsa »

Hello folks!!!

I got this ones for y'all. Who would've won between these two fighters and why in their primes. :TU: :TU: :TU: :TU: :TU:

It is a hard pick for me. I call it a draw. :TU: :TU: :TU:
Roco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 750
Joined: 20 May 2008, 07:30

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by Roco »

I would take Camacho by close decision.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by Counter-puncher »

Roco wrote:I would take Camacho by close decision.
hmmm. its a really interesting one. Mosley's got the physical tools to hang with Camacho speed-wise, plus he's more willing to take a shot and hits harder at 135lbs too.

on the hand's other side, Camacho had the better defensive skills and boxing brain. I don't think Camacho would be leading off too much nor do I think he'd be willing to exchange.

what's left in my mind is Camacho trying to potshot Mosely from the outside with quick clean shots and stay out of trouble. that does the job for one judge, maybe, but I think Mosley's aggressiveness would the key for the other two.

i wouldn't be surprised at a Split-type decision whatever happens, due to the style clash.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Roco wrote:I would take Camacho by close decision.
hmmm. its a really interesting one. Mosley's got the physical tools to hang with Camacho speed-wise, plus he's more willing to take a shot and hits harder at 135lbs too.

on the hand's other side, Camacho had the better defensive skills and boxing brain. I don't think Camacho would be leading off too much nor do I think he'd be willing to exchange.

what's left in my mind is Camacho trying to potshot Mosely from the outside with quick clean shots and stay out of trouble. that does the job for one judge, maybe, but I think Mosley's aggressiveness would the key for the other two.

i wouldn't be surprised at a Split-type decision whatever happens, due to the style clash.
Good post.
flatnoseflynn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 319
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 16:42

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by flatnoseflynn »

Camacho for me on points. :TU:
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by Bricks »

mosley imo
i actually think he was faster, and i know he hit harder....
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by King Carlos »

mugabi wrote:mosley imo
i actually think he was faster
:o
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Mosley was crazy quick, to be fair to Mugabi, but NOBODY was swifter than Camacho. Its THAT simple.
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by King Carlos »

Mosley had very fast hands, but Camacho was faster, and had the foot speed to match. With that said, I wouldn't necessarily favour him in this matchup. I'm looking at it like the Rosario fight. Difficult call.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15690
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Lightweights: Shane Mosley vs Hector"Macho" Camach

Post by elmersalsa »

flatnoseflynn wrote:Camacho for me on points. :TU:
2x
Post Reply