mike perez

Post Reply
tommo100
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 377
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 15:59

mike perez

Post by tommo100 »

the cuban fighting out of ireland
he looked a very decent prospect when he obliterated his prizefighter opponents
just had a look at his record and he`s been fairly inactive,is he classed as one of
"i don`t need him" brigade,he did look very useful indeed
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: mike perez

Post by loaded_gloves »

His weight fluctuates wildly. I don't trust a guy like that, particularly in this era of fat lazy heavies. He was nearly 18 stone for a recent fight. He won't go far.

Remember when Tyson was in perfect shape every time and splattering his opponents in cartoon violence style? We won't see that again.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: mike perez

Post by funso banjo baby »

hes better than solis

ive said that from day one

too short and fat to worry the elite though
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: mike perez

Post by jessi »

funso banjo baby wrote:hes better than solis

ive said that from day one

too short and fat to worry the elite though
I don't believe his better then solis
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: mike perez

Post by loaded_gloves »

I don't think height is any problem. I think a peak Tyson or Frazier would smoke the Klitschkos on the same night.

Perez is just another fat disinterested heavyweight and by that defenition is obviously going to underachieve. Solis looked a more technically acomplished boxer but was so fat he imploded on his big night.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: mike perez

Post by whiskey »

Image
Post Reply