peterson has lettered the WBA

Post Reply
fightscorecollector
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 473
Joined: 20 Dec 2011, 12:07

peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by fightscorecollector »

asking them to discard the amir khan re-match they ordered.

very intersting indeed as whether the WBA say yes or no its wide open to what each fighter does next....

IF the WBA say no to the rematch the you will probably see peterson take on pacquaio or more likely bradley.....khan will probably move up in weight

IF the WBA say yes to the rematch then peterson might still say no...so wo does amir fight for the belt....well by all rights it has to be the regular champion...maidana....that means khan moving up to 147lbs then as he has no interest in fighting maidana again.....peterson will probably still fight pacquaio or bradley
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by Crease »

fightscorecollector wrote:asking them to discard the amir khan re-match they ordered.
:-?

This does not surprise me in the slightest. Peterson forgets that he agreed to give Khan a rematch, I guess he just hasn't got the testicles for it.

Peterson was extremely fortunate to be given that fight against Khan - even Lederman had the fight in Khan's favour and the American commentators themselves described it as "hometown cooking".

This was nothing more than a snatch-'N-grab victory for Peterson he will move on now and I would not be surprised if he takes an easy fight now. If pressed, he'll probably relinquish the WBA Title and continue on with the IBF Title - and try to angle a unification fight against Bradley somewhere down the line, probably later this year.

If Khan does have a title fight for the WBA Title - I have my fingers-crossed that they select Devon Alexander as his opponent, that should be an entertaining fight to watch.

Peterson has nothing to complain about, he robbed Khan and will probably keep the IBF Title for this injustice...

God, I hope the IBF order an immediate rematch. Fingers-crossed.
:OhYes:
Crazyboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 11:56

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by Crazyboy »

Crease wrote:
spam wrote:asking them to discard the amir khan re-match they ordered.
:-?

This does not surprise me in the slightest. Peterson forgets that he agreed to give Khan a rematch, I guess he just hasn't got the testicles for it.

Peterson was extremely fortunate to be given that fight against Khan - even Lederman had the fight in Khan's favour and the American commentators themselves described it as "hometown cooking".

This was nothing more than a snatch-'N-grab victory for Peterson he will move on now and I would not be surprised if he takes an easy fight now. If pressed, he'll probably relinquish the WBA Title and continue on with the IBF Title - and try to angle a unification fight against Bradley somewhere down the line, probably later this year.

If Khan does have a title fight for the WBA Title - I have my fingers-crossed that they select Devon Alexander as his opponent, that should be an entertaining fight to watch.

Peterson has nothing to complain about, he robbed Khan and will probably keep the IBF Title for this injustice...

God, I hope the IBF order an immediate rematch. Fingers-crossed.
:OhYes:

haha brilliant, i do hope thats a sarcastic post.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by dondada »

I don't blame Peterson one bit.
Wrists
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1281
Joined: 09 May 2005, 12:13

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by Wrists »

dondada wrote:I don't blame Peterson one bit.
Nor do I. Although I do think Khan has a point about how dodgy this all is
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by Dan Dares »

Wrists wrote:
dondada wrote:I don't blame Peterson one bit.
Nor do I. Although I do think Khan has a point about how dodgy this all is
Khan didn't do enough in the fight to win it, regardless of all the shenanigans. I thought it was very close, but a fair result.

I don't agree with rematch clauses, but you have to look at the way Khan's team handled it, considering it was a voluntary defence. It was probably all about getting Peterson to accept a lower purse.

I think Khan's team make some strange decisions. Catching pennies and missing pounds.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by Crease »

Crazyboy wrote:haha brilliant, i do hope thats a sarcastic post.
It is not. Khan won that fight - he won more rounds, and I am of the opinion that had that fight taken place in any other country, it would have been a Khan UD.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by earsjohn »

Crease wrote:
Crazyboy wrote:haha brilliant, i do hope thats a sarcastic post.
It is not. Khan won that fight - he won more rounds in your opinion, and I am of the opinion that had that fight taken place in any other country, it would have been a Khan UD.
It was a close fight that could have gone either way. Even if you scored it to Khan, you have to admit that other people are entitled to watch the fight and form a different view. In a close fight such as this, to call it a robbery is to distract from true robberies in boxing such as Chisora v Helenius.

A close fight that goes against your man - tough call
A clear win that goes against your man - robbery.
Crazyboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 11:56

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by Crazyboy »

earsjohn wrote:
Crease wrote:
Crazyboy wrote:haha brilliant, i do hope thats a sarcastic post.
It is not. Khan won that fight - he won more rounds in your opinion, and I am of the opinion that had that fight taken place in any other country, it would have been a Khan UD.
It was a close fight that could have gone either way. Even if you scored it to Khan, you have to admit that other people are entitled to watch the fight and form a different view. In a close fight such as this, to call it a robbery is to distract from true robberies in boxing such as Chisora v Helenius.

A close fight that goes against your man - tough call
A clear win that goes against your man - robbery.
This x2

It wasn't robbery mate and to even say it was is laughable.......hence the laugh. :TU:
jtourettes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 822
Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by jtourettes »

Crease wrote:
spam wrote:asking them to discard the amir khan re-match they ordered.
:-?

This does not surprise me in the slightest. Peterson forgets that he agreed to give Khan a rematch, I guess he just hasn't got the testicles for it.

Peterson was extremely fortunate to be given that fight against Khan - even Lederman had the fight in Khan's favour and the American commentators themselves described it as "hometown cooking".

This was nothing more than a snatch-'N-grab victory for Peterson he will move on now and I would not be surprised if he takes an easy fight now. If pressed, he'll probably relinquish the WBA Title and continue on with the IBF Title - and try to angle a unification fight against Bradley somewhere down the line, probably later this year.

If Khan does have a title fight for the WBA Title - I have my fingers-crossed that they select Devon Alexander as his opponent, that should be an entertaining fight to watch.

Peterson has nothing to complain about, he robbed Khan and will probably keep the IBF Title for this injustice...

God, I hope the IBF order an immediate rematch. Fingers-crossed.
:OhYes:
:lol:

Even the HBO team had it for the HBO fighter? Shocking!
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: peterson has lettered the WBA

Post by loaded_gloves »

Crease wrote: Peterson was extremely fortunate to be given that fight against Khan - even Lederman had the fight in Khan's favour and the American commentators themselves described it as "hometown cooking".
You say that as if that actually means something.

What, the HBO judge and HBO commentators thought the HBO fighter won?

WOW! That's a first...
Post Reply