Man Up Frankie

whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by whiskey »

My gut instinct tells me this is about money, and nothing else. Maybe a bit of principle too.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28519
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by Coco »

G0mez wrote:My gut instinct tells me this is about money, and nothing else. Maybe a bit of principle too.
So why is he still on the bill then?
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

I wish we'd have gotten Gavin v Chaves that was being spoken about last year.
Frankie Gavin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 393
Joined: 09 Jul 2009, 17:39

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by Frankie Gavin »

I got offered lil money to fight cook I am in good shape now an will be fighting on the 25 th then again last week March first April been guaranteed that, then 6 weeks later so 3 times in 3 months I took cook fight last year for him not to make weight I ent bothered bout him but the terms were not good so turned it down I got told about fight then got told what I was getting so said no it never made sense
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by palooka »

good lad,you know the game and the rates of pay; none of us work under the going rate and none of us can expect a pat on the back if we do.
saturday_kid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by saturday_kid »

Dont really blame Frankie for not going with Cook first fight back, he's been out a while and Cook is still a dangerous fight imo.

Would like to see him fight Cook by April though
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by twenty six »

So who is in the opposite corner ?
WelshDevil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 536
Joined: 18 Sep 2006, 14:23

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by WelshDevil »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:I wish we'd have gotten Gavin v Chaves that was being spoken about last year.
That would be a really good fight.
JDC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2963
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 21:24

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by JDC »

Frankie Gavin wrote:I got offered lil money to fight cook I am in good shape now an will be fighting on the 25 th then again last week March first April been guaranteed that, then 6 weeks later so 3 times in 3 months I took cook fight last year for him not to make weight I ent bothered bout him but the terms were not good so turned it down I got told about fight then got told what I was getting so said no it never made sense
Nice :TU:

Get that ring rust off. Good luck
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by leforge »

twenty six wrote:So who is in the opposite corner ?
I would imagine someone who is cheap as Frankie was not willingly to fight Cook for the money they offered this opponent wont be good.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by whiskey »

Frankie Gavin wrote:I got offered lil money to fight cook I am in good shape now an will be fighting on the 25 th then again last week March first April been guaranteed that, then 6 weeks later so 3 times in 3 months I took cook fight last year for him not to make weight I ent bothered bout him but the terms were not good so turned it down I got told about fight then got told what I was getting so said no it never made sense
Well, whomever you fight - it will be good to see you getting yourself back on track Frankie.

:TU:
ApolloCreed
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by ApolloCreed »

im glad you lost your money appollo!!!
Good man Curtis! Good luck with rest of your career mate, you boxed very well that night.
curtis wood
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 935
Joined: 23 May 2010, 03:23

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by curtis wood »

thanks apolla just not quite good enough, ill get him next time!! :box:
coachster
Cruiserweight
Posts: 38
Joined: 19 Jun 2011, 12:16

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by coachster »

Frankie Gavin won't be able to shake off the doubters until he faces and comes through a couple of real live opponents. Other than Curtis Woodhouse (personally i thought Woodhouse shaded it) he hasn't really beat anyone of note yet. He hasn't got all the time in the world and if he is going to make a mark on the pro boxing scene then he will have to start producing very soon before the public and his promoter give up on him. 2012 really is the make or break year for Frankie Gavin i think. Lets hope it is the year he starts to fulfill his potential!
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by Dioufy »

After all he's done you'd think Gavin would fight Cook for any amount of money. It's not as if he's going to earn anymore fighting a Latvian. Sometimes you have to question how many brain cells that lad has. I reckon you could figure it out using your toes.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by Dioufy »

Admit you've been a twat, face Cookie, look good, then demand more money. Jeez - basic economics in boxing, especially for a young pro who has been useless so far.
wadey
Cruiserweight
Posts: 272
Joined: 01 Sep 2010, 07:00

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by wadey »

Gary McMillan

Errrrm looks like Frankie's career is going backwards.....
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by Gazmac81 »

Mcmillans a tough guy , not great boxing skills

had my bro on deck twice in First round in fight last year but was then outboxed
wadey wrote:Gary McMillan

Errrrm looks like Frankie's career is going backwards.....
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by twenty six »

Daren't say a word.
JamesH will only have a pop :roll:
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by JamesH »

twenty six wrote:Daren't say a word.
JamesH will only have a pop :roll:
Told you you were like an old woman. :roll:

Not the best opponent but not the worst. Better than a Latvian, no?

Think the De Gale story and frankies own post enlightens me more on this story than your tittle tattle, so fill your boots.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by twenty six »

Next you'll be telling me he's getting more money to face McMillan than Cook.
Face up to it, Gavin has side stepped Cook.
bigped
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1572
Joined: 05 Jul 2004, 16:26

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by bigped »

twenty six wrote:Next you'll be telling me he's getting more money to face McMillan than Cook.
Face up to it, Gavin has side stepped Cook.

lol i was gonna say that? must be on less cash for this fight,
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28519
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by Coco »

So 12 weeks notice is not enough to take on a 37 year old veteran who mainly has campaigned at 2 weights below in an 8 rounder??
Very poor showing considering your team had agreed terms with Cook and he was training hard for the fight.
Of course Gavin will be on less money for his new opponent and I bet FW is not happy either.
You would be in a good position to challenge for titles and demand more money with a good showing against Cook, now you are taking steps backwards.
There is no logic to what you are doing on any level, unless you have not been in the gym and need an easy fight or your ass has just gone because Cook is a rough handful who can bang.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Didn't want to fight Adnan Amar or Junior Witter.

The posters on here who said he'd beat Kell Brook have gone quiet.

:TU:
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Man Up Frankie

Post by JamesH »

twenty six wrote:Next you'll be telling me he's getting more money to face McMillan than Cook.
Face up to it, Gavin has side stepped Cook.
No I won't, you're just being a bit silly there.

Nonsense aside, you know enough about boxing to know about risk/reward, it has to be feasible for a number of reasons or it just doesn't make sense (think Rhodes-Small :wink: ).
Post Reply