The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2696
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Jaywheel »

:lol:
tommo100
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 377
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 15:59

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by tommo100 »

sven ottke vs anybody :roll: :roll: :roll:
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2696
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Jaywheel »

otis grant for instance? :roll:
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Deadendgeneration »

Ruiz vs Akinwande
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

King Carlos wrote:Yeah, the body wasn't much of an option against Winky, and Whitaker didn't have the power to make a dent in him. Not to mention Whitaker was not terribly convincing at 154, in my opinion. He looked pudgy and was clearly too small for the weight class. Wright would probably win a close, boring decision.

He was convincing enough to dominate a guy that floored Winky five times.
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Akinwande/Willard/Carnera/Ruiz

Stick them in any combination you want
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:Akinwande/Willard/Carnera/Ruiz

Stick them in any combination you want
Nice countenance to Leonard-Hagler-Hearns-Duran.

The Four Paupers? The Four Court Jesters?
iamasadlittleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1877
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 13:05

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by iamasadlittleboy »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Akinwande/Willard/Carnera/Ruiz

Stick them in any combination you want
Nice countenance to Leonard-Hagler-Hearns-Duran.

The Four Paupers? The Four Court Jesters?
Heck Throw Valuev in their as well (anyone remember his dull bouts with Ruiz? Nuff said)
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by King Carlos »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
King Carlos wrote:Yeah, the body wasn't much of an option against Winky, and Whitaker didn't have the power to make a dent in him. Not to mention Whitaker was not terribly convincing at 154, in my opinion. He looked pudgy and was clearly too small for the weight class. Wright would probably win a close, boring decision.

He was convincing enough to dominate a guy that floored Winky five times.
I certainly wouldn't call that a dominant performance. I thought it was an 8-4 type decision with plenty of close rounds. And Vasquez definitely wasn't dealing with a prime Winky when those two fought.

The main point was that Whitaker clearly didn't look to be the fighter he once was with that kind of weight on his frame, even though he matched up well stylistically with Vasquez.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

iamasadlittleboy wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Akinwande/Willard/Carnera/Ruiz

Stick them in any combination you want
Nice countenance to Leonard-Hagler-Hearns-Duran.

The Four Paupers? The Four Court Jesters?
Heck Throw Valuev in their as well (anyone remember his dull bouts with Ruiz? Nuff said)
Hes like the, "reverse-Benitez," of the group, a tremendously awkward guy who, by the court of popular opinion, is not quite awkward enough for the Four Queens :DD
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

King Carlos wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
King Carlos wrote:Yeah, the body wasn't much of an option against Winky, and Whitaker didn't have the power to make a dent in him. Not to mention Whitaker was not terribly convincing at 154, in my opinion. He looked pudgy and was clearly too small for the weight class. Wright would probably win a close, boring decision.

He was convincing enough to dominate a guy that floored Winky five times.
I certainly wouldn't call that a dominant performance. I thought it was an 8-4 type decision with plenty of close rounds. And Vasquez definitely wasn't dealing with a prime Winky when those two fought.

The main point was that Whitaker clearly didn't look to be the fighter he once was with that kind of weight on his frame, even though he matched up well stylistically with Vasquez.
Im quite certain Wright would defeat the 154 Mayweather, and he probably deserves favouritism over Whitaker at that weight, too. More size than ability accounting for that, however. Wright is still the lesser of these three boxers.
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by King Carlos »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
King Carlos wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
He was convincing enough to dominate a guy that floored Winky five times.
I certainly wouldn't call that a dominant performance. I thought it was an 8-4 type decision with plenty of close rounds. And Vasquez definitely wasn't dealing with a prime Winky when those two fought.

The main point was that Whitaker clearly didn't look to be the fighter he once was with that kind of weight on his frame, even though he matched up well stylistically with Vasquez.
Im quite certain Wright would defeat the 154 Mayweather, and he probably deserves favouritism over Whitaker at that weight, too. More size than ability accounting for that, however. Wright is still the lesser of these three boxers.
I agree.
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by jezzamundo »

Deadendgeneration wrote:Ruiz vs Akinwande
What with all of the cuddling, I think there's a distinct chance this would look more like a second date than a fight.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

jezzamundo wrote:
Deadendgeneration wrote:Ruiz vs Akinwande
What with all of the cuddling, I think there's a distinct chance this would look more like a second date than a fight.
The only fight in history where you needed a chapperone, not a referee.
AngryGoon38
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by AngryGoon38 »

I just thought of a really good one.

"Ricky Hatton vs Carlos Baldomir" would've been extremely awkward. At least after awhile. Overall,It'd likely be Part Brawlfest,gravitating to Hugfest for at least the last half of a 12 rd'er.
Diamond WEAPON
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1729
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Diamond WEAPON »

AngryGoon38 wrote:I just thought of a really good one.

"Ricky Hatton vs Carlos Baldomir" would've been extremely awkward. At least after awhile. Overall,It'd likely be Part Brawlfest,gravitating to Hugfest for at least the last half of a 12 rd'er.
Yeah, lots of holding and hitting in that one. I think Baldomir would wear him down though, he was very good at taking body shots, he laughed at everything Gatti hit him with and Arturo was smashing him about as hard as he landed on anyone.
jrc26
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 271
Joined: 27 May 2009, 15:40

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by jrc26 »

Chris Byrd vs Davarryl Williamson II.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

King Carlos wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
King Carlos wrote:Yeah, the body wasn't much of an option against Winky, and Whitaker didn't have the power to make a dent in him. Not to mention Whitaker was not terribly convincing at 154, in my opinion. He looked pudgy and was clearly too small for the weight class. Wright would probably win a close, boring decision.

He was convincing enough to dominate a guy that floored Winky five times.
I certainly wouldn't call that a dominant performance. I thought it was an 8-4 type decision with plenty of close rounds. And Vasquez definitely wasn't dealing with a prime Winky when those two fought.

The main point was that Whitaker clearly didn't look to be the fighter he once was with that kind of weight on his frame, even though he matched up well stylistically with Vasquez.

You can call it whatever you want, Pea schooled him. As for Wright being prime or not, he still got bounced off of the canvas like a ball.

And your last point is just silly. Whitaker wasn't at his ideal weight at 154 pounds? Really? :lol:
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by King Carlos »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
King Carlos wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
He was convincing enough to dominate a guy that floored Winky five times.
I certainly wouldn't call that a dominant performance. I thought it was an 8-4 type decision with plenty of close rounds. And Vasquez definitely wasn't dealing with a prime Winky when those two fought.

The main point was that Whitaker clearly didn't look to be the fighter he once was with that kind of weight on his frame, even though he matched up well stylistically with Vasquez.

You can call it whatever you want, Pea schooled him. As for Wright being prime or not, he still got bounced off of the canvas like a ball.

And your last point is just silly. Whitaker wasn't at his ideal weight at 154 pounds? Really? :lol:
I'm as big a fan of Whitaker as you'll find, and I didn't think it was a schooling at all. A clear win is not necessarily a schooling, and certainly not in that case. I've even heard it argued a 7-5 type decision. Hell, I'm pretty sure Seamus scored the fight to Vasquez ( :lol: ), or at least he used to.

Your second paragraph is just silly, considering that's the point I was making in the first place. You were the one who had something to say about it. Derp!
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

King Carlos wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
King Carlos wrote:I certainly wouldn't call that a dominant performance. I thought it was an 8-4 type decision with plenty of close rounds. And Vasquez definitely wasn't dealing with a prime Winky when those two fought.

The main point was that Whitaker clearly didn't look to be the fighter he once was with that kind of weight on his frame, even though he matched up well stylistically with Vasquez.

You can call it whatever you want, Pea schooled him. As for Wright being prime or not, he still got bounced off of the canvas like a ball.

And your last point is just silly. Whitaker wasn't at his ideal weight at 154 pounds? Really? :lol:
I'm as big a fan of Whitaker as you'll find, and I didn't think it was a schooling at all. A clear win is not necessarily a schooling, and certainly not in that case. I've even heard it argued a 7-5 type decision. Hell, I'm pretty sure Seamus scored the fight to Vasquez ( :lol: ), or at least he used to.

Your second paragraph is just silly, considering that's the point I was making in the first place. You were the one who had something to say about it. Derp!
I never said 154 was his best weight. I just pointed out that he was convincing enough to easily beat one of the top guys. You should probably watch the fight, it wasn't close.

But thanks for pointing out the obvious, retard. Where would the forum be without you? Why don't you break your next scoop on why Thomas Hearns prime weight wasn't Cruiser?
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by King Carlos »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
King Carlos wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
You can call it whatever you want, Pea schooled him. As for Wright being prime or not, he still got bounced off of the canvas like a ball.

And your last point is just silly. Whitaker wasn't at his ideal weight at 154 pounds? Really? :lol:
I'm as big a fan of Whitaker as you'll find, and I didn't think it was a schooling at all. A clear win is not necessarily a schooling, and certainly not in that case. I've even heard it argued a 7-5 type decision. Hell, I'm pretty sure Seamus scored the fight to Vasquez ( :lol: ), or at least he used to.

Your second paragraph is just silly, considering that's the point I was making in the first place. You were the one who had something to say about it. Derp!
I never said 154 was his best weight. I just pointed out that he was convincing enough to easily beat one of the top guys. You should probably watch the fight, it wasn't close.

But thanks for pointing out the obvious, retard. Where would the forum be without you? Why don't you break your next scoop on why Thomas Hearns prime weight wasn't Cruiser?
I pointed out the obvious, you disagreed with the obvious, and now you're trying to turn it around on me because you realise you made a boo-boo. Fair enough. You'd look like less of a bitch if you just conceded defeat, but whatever floats your boat. :TU:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

That has to be the most pathetic post I've ever read. Congrats on that. You're the undisputed king of gay.
King Carlos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1123
Joined: 11 May 2010, 19:10

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by King Carlos »

Image
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2696
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: The Awkward Match-ups Thread...

Post by Jaywheel »

Get a room.
Post Reply