It wasn't fine with you, you said in your dreams and Greb can't be KO'd and he once beat a giant named Goliath so there is no way that a tiny, tiny midget like Marvin hagler could possibly compete with him and I should respect Harry more than picking a scrub like hagler over him when he has never even fought a giant.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Oh now I get your drift. You express your opinion that Hagler would beat Harry Greb. Fine with me sir. But when I gave my opinion that Greb because of his record of whipping alltime bigger men,would beat Hagler, you tell me "to get off my high horse "and I am full of myself. Nice way to treat a new poster.!beaujack wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote: I'm new at this website and i take boxing seriously. I revere our top fighters of history, yes my idol Harry Greb ,and also Marvin Hagler of recent years. So S, I don't know where you are coming from and if you are just joshing with me, let me know as I too have a sense of humor...
I don't know what your point is. I rate Harry as the 3rd or 4th greatest fighter in history and I think Marvin Hagler could beat him. That isn't disrespect or humor, it's my opinion. I'm not some kid that needs updates of harry Greb's accomplishments. Not a thing you can post would change my mind.
Perhaps a new poster should get his bearings about a place before assuming a position on a high horse. Either way I treat everyone equally poor, so no need to feel picked on.[/quote]
My "bearings" are fine. Thank you...
P.S. I get the feeling it is you who is "horsing" around...Cheers.
