Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post Reply
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by broomy7s »

March 2nd at the Troxy in London apparently, allegedly in partnership with Mickey Helliet co promoting.

Smith stepping up to Super-Featherweight for the WBO Intercontinental Championship.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by leforge »

They just filling schedules now on allegedly!
15829
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3505
Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 13:26

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by 15829 »

Good to see Smith more active but he wasnt exactly a huge featherweight
boxingfarmer30
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by boxingfarmer30 »

leforge wrote:They just filling schedules now on Allegedly channel!
Very easy bout this for Smith.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by jBacca »

Selby has beat Jones. How did the fight pan out?
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by maley1984 »

jBacca wrote:Selby has beat Jones. How did the fight pan out?
its on u tube
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by billy nelson »

diggler wrote:Good to see Smith more active but he wasnt exactly a huge featherweight
Stephen was a big Featherweight mate.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by Counter-puncher »

billy nelson wrote:
diggler wrote:Good to see Smith more active but he wasnt exactly a huge featherweight
Stephen was a big Featherweight mate.

i love this site. was Smith a big featherweight- well lets ask a guy who's been in the opposite corner? thanks billy :TU:
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by tear up »

ben jones is a good fighter hell step up to the mark with smith and this will or could turn into a good fight but see smith comin out on top :TU:
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by maley1984 »

cant see this fight happening. smith fighting in germany on klit v chisora and he wants a rematch with selby
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6646
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by THEBUTCH »

Jones is a good boxer, but Smith's spoiling style not good for him. Ben is good to watch so i'd steer him in another direction.

The WBO interconti shite seems to have made an unwelcome return recently...spoils what should be a final eliminator between two highly rated British title contenders.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by leforge »

maley1984 wrote:cant see this fight happening. smith fighting in germany on klit v chisora and he wants a rematch with selby
Fights annouced headlimg a bill from the troxy.
HellraiserBoxing
Cruiserweight
Posts: 138
Joined: 18 Aug 2011, 17:18

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by HellraiserBoxing »

Fight is all agreed Swifty Smith v Ben Jones. I'm really pleased to have this fight on, Ben Jones gave Selby a hard time, they are both very much up for it, will defo be a good scrap, exactly the type of fight I want on my shows!
boxingfarmer30
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by boxingfarmer30 »

HellraiserBoxing wrote:Fight is all agreed Swifty Smith v Ben Jones. I'm really pleased to have this fight on, Ben Jones gave Selby a hard time, they are both very much up for it, will defo be a good scrap, exactly the type of fight I want on my shows!
Again an easy fight for swifty.
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by Glyn Leach »

Not a bad match at al IMO. Obviously Smith has the higher profile so I can understand how people might think Jones is easy for him, but Swifty is coming off a bad stoppage loss and moving up a division and these things level the playing field significantly. I'd rate it a 60-40 in Smith's favour due to experience as we've yet to see what Jones is like at this level and he could thrive as easy as fall. Interesting whatever way it goes.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by leforge »

Glyn Leach wrote:Not a bad match at al IMO. Obviously Smith has the higher profile so I can understand how people might think Jones is easy for him, but Swifty is coming off a bad stoppage loss and moving up a division and these things level the playing field significantly. I'd rate it a 60-40 in Smith's favour due to experience as we've yet to see what Jones is like at this level and he could thrive as easy as fall. Interesting whatever way it goes.
The inter fights are making a return again!
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by tear up »

i like this fight ben jones will step up to the plate i reckon and it will b a good fight but takin smith to win in the end
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by Glyn Leach »

leforge wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:Not a bad match at al IMO. Obviously Smith has the higher profile so I can understand how people might think Jones is easy for him, but Swifty is coming off a bad stoppage loss and moving up a division and these things level the playing field significantly. I'd rate it a 60-40 in Smith's favour due to experience as we've yet to see what Jones is like at this level and he could thrive as easy as fall. Interesting whatever way it goes.
The inter fights are making a return again!
Sadly they are. Mentioned that to Francis W on Twitter yesterday re this fight, it just doesn't need it. Those things are superfluous to good fights. I mean, Brook vs Hatton for God's sake, who cares about their manky meaningless belts? It's the quality of match that counts. Just have a non- title 12-rounder ffs, if anything taking on a big fight without there being a belt on the line reflects better on everyone involved IMO. Yet they insist on paying sanction fees for these stupid things just so they can have belts on their posters and, in the worst instances, advertise their fights as being for world titles. I'll stop now because I could go on all day about this one. :bag: :witzend:
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by leforge »

Glyn Leach wrote:
leforge wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:Not a bad match at al IMO. Obviously Smith has the higher profile so I can understand how people might think Jones is easy for him, but Swifty is coming off a bad stoppage loss and moving up a division and these things level the playing field significantly. I'd rate it a 60-40 in Smith's favour due to experience as we've yet to see what Jones is like at this level and he could thrive as easy as fall. Interesting whatever way it goes.
The inter fights are making a return again!
Sadly they are. Mentioned that to Francis W on Twitter yesterday re this fight, it just doesn't need it. Those things are superfluous to good fights. I mean, Brook vs Hatton for God's sake, who cares about their manky meaningless belts? It's the quality of match that counts. Just have a non- title 12-rounder ffs, if anything taking on a big fight without there being a belt on the line reflects better on everyone involved IMO. Yet they insist on paying sanction fees for these stupid things just so they can have belts on their posters and, in the worst instances, advertise their fights as being for world titles. I'll stop now because I could go on all day about this one. :bag: :witzend:
Ben Jones is English champ surely they could fight for that the inter titles always have been shite. Brook V Hatton is 2 top 20 fighters get it on needs no title at all. The winner we surely be in line for World title as both highly ranked.
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by broomy7s »

I think it's a very decent comeback fight for Smith.
saturday_kid
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 847
Joined: 14 May 2009, 04:05

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by saturday_kid »

leforge wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:
leforge wrote: The inter fights are making a return again!
Sadly they are. Mentioned that to Francis W on Twitter yesterday re this fight, it just doesn't need it. Those things are superfluous to good fights. I mean, Brook vs Hatton for God's sake, who cares about their manky meaningless belts? It's the quality of match that counts. Just have a non- title 12-rounder ffs, if anything taking on a big fight without there being a belt on the line reflects better on everyone involved IMO. Yet they insist on paying sanction fees for these stupid things just so they can have belts on their posters and, in the worst instances, advertise their fights as being for world titles. I'll stop now because I could go on all day about this one. :bag: :witzend:
Ben Jones is English champ surely they could fight for that the inter titles always have been shite. Brook V Hatton is 2 top 20 fighters get it on needs no title at all. The winner we surely be in line for World title as both highly ranked.
I agree, but Mr FW doesn't seem to be a fan of English/British titles, prefers to put fighters up for silly WBO intercontintal belts - it sounds cooler to the kids you know
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Stephen Smith v Ben Jones

Post by DavidPayne »

Ben Jones is no mug and will be coming to win.
Post Reply