allegedly home of BOXING

Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by Shirow »

mimmy123 wrote:Yes, but you cant pay a fighter the same few quid if he's on TV. There are reasons you know why those fights arent on the channel.

Its all money!!!
You can if you own the channel and the promotional outfit. If undercard boxers are turning down tv exposure on top of their usual pay they aren't doing themselves any favours.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

bad mamma jamma wrote:
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Why do Steve and Steve talk as if the options were only big American stars or Karpency?
Why not mention the likes of Sillahk (yeah baby...), Bellew (rematch), Garcia (maybe a little unknown but very good Cuban), Kovalev (hard punching Russian) or even mention Chilemba as a future possibility?
good point, i found it hilarious when sillakh won recently and Bunce basically said he was shit! Sillakh is a very good fighter and would beat cleverley imo. Bunce knows eff all
Like you said. Bunce has to play down any threats to stop people from getting too curious and suggesting these guys as opponents. It's the usual very bizarre FW parallel universe in which Nathan Cleverly, Light Heavyweight World Champion of Wales, is continually being interviewed with that embarrassing paper title belt slung over his shoulder, talking about things like 'reaching the top of the sport' and his 'duties as World Champion'. Christ, people like Kabrat Murat or whatever that fringe top 30 guy is called must get a nice boost of confidence when referred to in revered tones as a 'tough challenge' for such a decorated hero. Hell, he must be on at his manager all the time to get him a crack at Bernard Hopkins!

Oh yeah, Bunce very well knows Sillakh would knock Cleverly into next week.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by Final round »

Is Dawson vs Hopkins II on BN
Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

The way some people talk about it on here, you would think allegedly was physically forcing people to pay £150 a month to watch a continuous loop of a Steve Roberts WBF mid 90's title fight.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by leforge »

Final round wrote:Is Dawson vs Hopkins II on BN
Yes it is. is not promoted by Golden Boy. The first fight was a stinker think this will be too. hopkins should retire.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by Final round »

leforge wrote:
Final round wrote:Is Dawson vs Hopkins II on BN
Yes it is. is not promoted by Golden Boy. The first fight was a stinker think this will be too. hopkins should retire.
The first fight never even got going enough to call it a stinker, Hopkins worked out Pascal over a few rounds could he do the same to Dawson?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by leforge »

Final round wrote:
leforge wrote:
Final round wrote:Is Dawson vs Hopkins II on BN
Yes it is. is not promoted by Golden Boy. The first fight was a stinker think this will be too. hopkins should retire.
The first fight never even got going enough to call it a stinker, Hopkins worked out Pascal over a few rounds could he do the same to Dawson?
Hopkins has been in so many stinkers, the Pascal fights aside.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by Final round »

leforge wrote:
Final round wrote:
leforge wrote: Yes it is. is not promoted by Golden Boy. The first fight was a stinker think this will be too. hopkins should retire.
The first fight never even got going enough to call it a stinker, Hopkins worked out Pascal over a few rounds could he do the same to Dawson?
Hopkins has been in so many stinkers, the Pascal fights aside.
You're right he has but even so I'm still intrigued.

Abner Mares vs Eric Morel April 21 st on B o x nation
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by leforge »

Final round wrote:
leforge wrote:
Final round wrote: The first fight never even got going enough to call it a stinker, Hopkins worked out Pascal over a few rounds could he do the same to Dawson?
Hopkins has been in so many stinkers, the Pascal fights aside.
You're right he has but even so I'm still intrigued.

Abner Mares vs Eric Morel April 21 st on B o x nation
Its good for fans Sky have picked up their game it all depends how long it lasts. Hopkins I give a miss but wil watch that fight,.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Allegedly channel home of BOXING

Post by palooka »

Dawson was far too keen, confident and young fast and strong for Hopkins; 2nd bout will reinforce that; Hopkins will be done inside 6.
Post Reply