Harry Greb vs Stanely Ketchell

Post Reply
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Harry Greb vs Stanely Ketchell

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

what a war this would be at middleweight, who do you guys think wins???
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

I'm sure people have gone over and over on this one. I have argued both ways over the years. For the record I can't pick one exactly.
However I would say Greb wins 2 out of 3. Or back in those days and the way Greb liked to "revisit" the scene of the crime I'd say Greb wins 4 out of 6.
dws
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 100
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 00:21

Post by dws »

Greb by decision,better skills and he can't be KO'd,not even by Ketchel.
tiredoldngrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2005, 12:36

Post by tiredoldngrey »

What a fight this would've been; both known for tremendous endurance, speed, ferocity, volume punching, and for having no regard for the rules whatsoever. This one goes the distance, and nobody is outboxing anybody; they would be right there throwing punches and defending against punches for the duration. It is quite possible that weapons would be used. Who would win? Greb from what I've read had handspeed beyond compare while Ketchel was the harder puncher, but Greb was naturally larger. You tell me.
dnahar32
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 348
Joined: 11 Aug 2004, 15:10

Post by dnahar32 »

The ultimate old school middleweight matchup. No one seems to match up Kid McCoy with Ketchel, or Harry Greb with Tommy Ryan, for example, but everyone looks at Ketchel vs. Greb.

I think Greb would win a close 15rd decision. I agree with tiredoldngrey that no rules could be enforced because these fighters did everything in the book and a lot of stuff never even written in the book. All of this fouling, butting, and mauling would nullify much of the power of these two and they would fight to a close decision. I favor Greb on activity (299 pro fights to 60+ for Ketchel so he probably knew a few more tricks), an iron chin, and the better competition he fought at middleweight and above.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17071
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Post by Seamus »

I'll be the voice of dissent on this one and say that Ketchel wins the decision based on his amazing punching power and stamina (when in shape). Stanley Ketchel was undoubtedly one of the greatest punchers who ever lived, and while he's often dismissed as a brawler, he had little difficulty landing punches on his opponents, and that of course includes the defensive wizard Jack Johnson. What Ketchel nearly accomplished against Jack Johnson is simply mind boggling. Prior to being knocked out in the 12th, Ketchel had not only withstood several of Johnson's best shots, but had also hurt the heavyweight champion as well. In fact, according to one detailed account, Johnson appeared to rise at the count of 9 after Ketchel floored him in the 12th, and was still groggy from the effects moments later as he put Ketchel down for the count, indicating that Jack Johnson, still considered by many to be the greatest heavyweight of all time had come within a second of being knocked out by a man he outweighed by 44 pounds. Was the fight just a fluke ? I think that Ketchel's destruction of Philadelphia Jack O'Brien (who had recently fared well against Johnson in a 6 rounder) in two fights is clear proof that it wasen't.

Greb's record is also amazing, and while he ended up with alot more ring experience than Ketchel, I think the telling factor in a fight like this would be Ketchel's big advantage in punching power. Greb has the advantage in boxing ability, and they're probably even in durability and stamina, but I can't see Greb being able to avoid Ketchel's power punches throughout the fight.
tiredoldngrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2005, 12:36

Post by tiredoldngrey »

Nothing that could happen in this fight would suprise me, and I can't convince myself why one or the other would win, but, if pressed, I think I would have to agree with Seamus and put my money on Ketchel to win by decision.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

The problem here is that they would never fight just one fight. Everybody probably takes home a win or two in this series. Greb seemed to always want to come back for more, especially in the close ones. Did Greb fight anyone that he didnt defeat at least once?
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Post by Ezzard »

Greb would win more often than not. There's no dount that Ketchel would be a handful but I think he loses this one. Greb is too good and must be top 3 at Middle
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Harry Greb vs Stanely Ketchell

Post by Giancarlo »

As Klompy's book is almost out, here's an interesting thread from a while back
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46514
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Harry Greb vs Stanely Ketchell

Post by gilgamesh »

Harry by decision for me.
klompton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2738
Joined: 07 Jul 2003, 02:27

Re: Harry Greb vs Stanely Ketchell

Post by klompton »

Greb. Of course people will say Im biased but just looking at it logically I have to go with Greb. Those that pick Ketchel will dwell on his punching power. I dont think Ketchel hit harder than a KO Bill Brennan who Greb not only beat easily but wasnt fazed by his power and was actually stronger than. Really, Greb fought tons of guys where he was at a major disadvantage powerwise. If that was what you were banking on to beat Greb you better bring friends with you.
Post Reply