interesting match up
who you got in this one
Lightweights: Whitticker v JM Marquez
-
thunderfromdownunder
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Lightweights: Whitticker v JM Marquez
Its spelled, 'Whitaker.'
And he embarrasses Marquez to the tune of 9-3.
And he embarrasses Marquez to the tune of 9-3.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Lightweights: Whitticker v JM Marquez
JMM has always been horrible chasing down movers.
-
Deadendgeneration
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1906
- Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01
Re: Lightweights: Whitticker v JM Marquez
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Its spelled, 'Whitaker.'
And he embarrasses Marquez to the tune of 9-3.
If he takes his foot off for a few rounds. This could easily be a whitewash.
-
Diamond WEAPON
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1729
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32
Re: Lightweights: Whitticker v JM Marquez
Whitaker's too fast for Marquez to land much on and too big/sturdy for the few shots Marquez would land to make a really tempo-altering impression on him. He presents the same stylistic issues Floyd Mayweather did, only from different angles. Marquez doesn't much like chasing guys down.
-
IRLangmaid25
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08
Re: Lightweights: Whitticker v JM Marquez
I am going to Pernell Whittaker on this one, while he does not have the power that Marquez possesses he has the quicker hands and superior footwork and would simply drive Marquez completely crazy in the fight by letting off beautiful 3-4 punch combinations to the head and body and then getting of range before Marquez can effectively counter punch.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Lightweights: Whitticker v JM Marquez
Yep, you could well be right.Deadendgeneration wrote:Goodnight, Irene wrote:Its spelled, 'Whitaker.'
And he embarrasses Marquez to the tune of 9-3.
If he takes his foot off for a few rounds. This could easily be a whitewash.