Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post Reply
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by forcefraser »

I watched "Legendary Nights" last night, the episode on Hagler v Hearns.

Hearns apparently broke his right hand in the first round and we all know what happened 2 rounds later. It was awar whilst it lasted, but I wonder whether the fight would have had a different outcome had Hearns not broken his hand?

I don`t think it would. Hagler is my favourite fighter of all time. He was rock solid and just broke his opponents down with his workrate and not stop bombardment, plus he had a great chin.

Hagler would have knocked Hearns out regardless of the hand, but a great fight may have been even better had the hand stood up.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by MightyWarrior »

All time great first round - I picked Tommy to win ( my fave fighter, so heart over head ) but as soon as we saw him land his best on Hagler in the first, and Marv kept coming, you knew it was game over, broken hand or not.
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by nobby_nobbins »

I think the first round between Benn and Barklay was just as good, but I suppose it meant less because there was no special rivalry between the two beforehand. It was just a routine title fight for a meaningless bauble. Hagler didn't just win a belt by beating Hearns, he won major bragging rights.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by Quixall »

There was another reason why Hearns fought the way he did that night. Manny Steward explained in an interview, that just before the fight, one of Tommy Hearn's friends had given Tommy a leg massage and apparently Tommy said to Steward " My legs don't feel right.......", saying that he felt sluggish. Steward basically said that the masssage had taken all the strength from Tommy's legs and he felt weaker, so that was one of the reasons he went out like he did because he didn't think he could last the distance.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by JamesH »

That 'Legendary Nights' series was, well, legendary. Wasn't there talk about another series of it?
The End
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 931
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 17:53

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by The End »

Quixall wrote:There was another reason why Hearns fought the way he did that night. Manny Steward explained in an interview, that just before the fight, one of Tommy Hearn's friends had given Tommy a leg massage and apparently Tommy said to Steward " My legs don't feel right.......", saying that he felt sluggish. Steward basically said that the masssage had taken all the strength from Tommy's legs and he felt weaker, so that was one of the reasons he went out like he did because he didn't think he could last the distance.
I thought that massage story was the Leonard bout .
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by Quixall »

The End wrote:
Quixall wrote:There was another reason why Hearns fought the way he did that night. Manny Steward explained in an interview, that just before the fight, one of Tommy Hearn's friends had given Tommy a leg massage and apparently Tommy said to Steward " My legs don't feel right.......", saying that he felt sluggish. Steward basically said that the masssage had taken all the strength from Tommy's legs and he felt weaker, so that was one of the reasons he went out like he did because he didn't think he could last the distance.
I thought that massage story was the Leonard bout .
No, it was definately Hearns. I can put up the video link of the interview.
tommo100
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 377
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 15:59

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by tommo100 »

forcefraser wrote:I watched "Legendary Nights" last night, the episode on Hagler v Hearns.

Hearns apparently broke his right hand in the first round and we all know what happened 2 rounds later. It was awar whilst it lasted, but I wonder whether the fight would have had a different outcome had Hearns not broken his hand?

I don`t think it would. Hagler is my favourite fighter of all time. He was rock solid and just broke his opponents down with his workrate and not stop bombardment, plus he had a great chin.

Hagler would have knocked Hearns out regardless of the hand, but a great fight may have been even better had the hand stood up.
if it had carried on much longer hagler may have been stopped over that nasty cut on his forehead,he was covered in blood in the second and third,it must have been getting in his eyes
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by Deserter »

I think what really hampered Hearns was that terrible injury to his toe... :wink:
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by Old bones Ian »

one of the great boxing quotes came at the end of the 2nd round the Ref Steele asked Hagler whether Hearns was still visible, Hagler retorted; "Well, I ain't missing him, am I?"
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hagler v Hearns - Legendary Nights

Post by Datsue »

Old bones Ian wrote:one of the great boxing quotes came at the end of the 2nd round the Ref Steele asked Hagler whether Hearns was still visible, Hagler retorted; "Well, I ain't missing him, am I?"

:bow: :lol:
Post Reply