Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by Ambling Alp »

Hard to believe that I have the "audacity" to refute your brilliant, unbiased points.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Ambling Alp wrote:Hard to believe that I have the "audacity" to refute your brilliant, unbiased points.
You invent your own arguments as you go along. Even now, when it was over you just can't get over it. You're one sad little dude.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by Ezzard »

Boilermaker wrote:
Seamus wrote:I believe Ferdie Pacheco thought Leonard won in Montreal, and there were some sportswriters who were also of that opinion.

When the decision was announced, there was doubt everywhere as to who would win (and not just like nowadays where you presume one or two judges were in the pocket). It could have fairly gone either way. I thought Duran shaded it (at the time), even though I wanted Leonard to win.
I wanted leonard to win too. I thought it was very close. When I watched it again I realised it wasn't that close. Not to say that Leonard didn't fight him all the way, just that Duran clearly won more rounds and was in control.

Same with the Hagler fight. I thought Leonard won easily, when I watched it back I realised it was a very close fight, though I still think Ray won it.

Duran was simply not as effective at 147 than he was at 135. This is a disadvantage, anything else is just partisanship.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Ezzard wrote:
Boilermaker wrote:
Seamus wrote:I believe Ferdie Pacheco thought Leonard won in Montreal, and there were some sportswriters who were also of that opinion.

When the decision was announced, there was doubt everywhere as to who would win (and not just like nowadays where you presume one or two judges were in the pocket). It could have fairly gone either way. I thought Duran shaded it (at the time), even though I wanted Leonard to win.
I wanted leonard to win too. I thought it was very close. When I watched it again I realised it wasn't that close. Not to say that Leonard didn't fight him all the way, just that Duran clearly won more rounds and was in control.

Same with the Hagler fight. I thought Leonard won easily, when I watched it back I realised it was a very close fight, though I still think Ray won it.

Duran was simply not as effective at 147 than he was at 135. This is a disadvantage, anything else is just partisanship.

I don't know man, I think Duran was at his absolute best against Palomino & Leonard.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17071
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by Seamus »

At 135, Duran sometimes fought like he had total disdain for defense. Because of that I've wondered sometimes what would have happened if he faced a LW with one punch knockout power.
scallum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 29 Jul 2011, 10:06

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by scallum »

SRL over Hagler is the top one for the 80s for me. I was so afraid for SRL b4 the fight but he showed true grit to pull off the victory
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by Ezzard »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Ezzard wrote:
Boilermaker wrote:
When the decision was announced, there was doubt everywhere as to who would win (and not just like nowadays where you presume one or two judges were in the pocket). It could have fairly gone either way. I thought Duran shaded it (at the time), even though I wanted Leonard to win.
I wanted leonard to win too. I thought it was very close. When I watched it again I realised it wasn't that close. Not to say that Leonard didn't fight him all the way, just that Duran clearly won more rounds and was in control.

Same with the Hagler fight. I thought Leonard won easily, when I watched it back I realised it was a very close fight, though I still think Ray won it.

Duran was simply not as effective at 147 than he was at 135. This is a disadvantage, anything else is just partisanship.

I don't know man, I think Duran was at his absolute best against Palomino & Leonard.
Apologies for the delay, mate.

Thing is Duran tapped into a whole skill set that he didn’t seem to need at 135.

Everything in relative terms becomes more difficult. Your power, strength, durability, height, reach are all eroded as you move up. These are hard things to overcome, especially for aggressive fighters, less so for more polished boxers.

I guess that’s what this comes down to for me. He was likely at his best for DeJesus where he had all the physical gifts and the showed off the skills too.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by Counter-puncher »

i lean towards your view, Ezz, Duran vs Palomino and SRL was clearly more technically-polished, but for me the extra physicality of the Duran who beat Dejesus made him terrifying inm a way that more than compensated for the slight skills deficit compared to his later self. :TU:
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by Ezzard »

Or put it like this. If Duran hadn’t developed those skills, his barnstorming, balls-out style would have not have been enough at welterweight. Not against Ray and not necessarily against all the others either.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

His defense was better as he moved up in weight and I wouldn't say he was more physical against DeJesus, Palomino & Leonard were just able to stand up to it.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by Ezzard »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:His defense was better as he moved up in weight and I wouldn't say he was more physical against DeJesus, Palomino & Leonard were just able to stand up to it.
I agree. He had to develop his other skills to make up for the fact he was fighting bigger men. Only a few can do this. And the ones usually most successful are the boxer types.

Duran, Armstrong and Holyfield are pretty distinguished for their achievements. Chavez too, but to a lesser extent. Also, pretty amazing that Hearns could bounce guys off the canvas as he moved up in weight.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7175
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Greatest Achievements of the 1980s

Post by Nile4000 »

Ezzard wrote:Here is my list of the greatest achievements of the 1980s. My criteria is quality of opponent; size disparity (moving up from your best weight counts for you, beating someone who moves up tempers your win a little); the margin of victory; the condition of the two fighters… I gave the draws to the moral victors.

I made a stab at the order, hopefully they are all from the 80s, but I reserve the right to have balls’d it up…

Roberto Duran – Ray Leonard
Ray Leonard – Marvin Hagler
Jeff Fenech – Azumah Nelson
Roberto Duran – Iran Barkley
Salvador Sanchez – Wilfredo Gomez

Ray Leonard – Thomas Hearns
Thomas Hearns – Pipino Cuevas
Michael Nunn – Sumbu Kalambay
Salvador Sanchez – Azumah Nelson
Marvin Hagler – Thomas Hearns

Michael Spinks – Larry Holmes
Lloyd Honeyghan – Donald Curry
Julio Cesar Chavez – Edwin Rosario
Thomas Hearns – Ray Leonard
Michael Spinks – Dwight Qawi
Chavez was just too strong for Rosario, and that was the fight right there.
Post Reply