tonights R by R

jessi · Post by **jessi** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:45

leforge wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:
jessi wrote:I'm gona get laughed at here but I don't care, FRANKIE GAVIN beats kell brook !
What at?
Not making weight! Not getting paid on time after fight!

Your all see, he would of stopped hatton by now.

milpool · Post by **milpool** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:45

jessi wrote:I'm gona get laughed at here but I don't care, FRANKIE GAVIN beats kell brook !

I think you'll be on your own in thinking that mate!

ShadrachSimmo · Post by **ShadrachSimmo** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:45

jessi wrote:
leforge wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote: What at?
Not making weight! Not getting paid on time after fight!
Your all see, he would of stopped hatton by now.

What at?

jessi · Post by **jessi** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:47

milpool wrote:
jessi wrote:I'm gona get laughed at here but I don't care, FRANKIE GAVIN beats kell brook !
I think you'll be on your own in thinking that mate!

That's absolutely fine, I think I was on my own when I called groves degale and groves v Anderson 2.

deadpan · Post by **deadpan** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:48

Brook should really stop Hatton here. Anything less and his world credentials are questionable.

jessi · Post by **jessi** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:48

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
jessi wrote:I'm gona get laughed at here but I don't care, FRANKIE GAVIN beats kell brook !
What at?

What's your point, it's not funny !

leforge · Post by **leforge** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:49

deadpan wrote:Brook should really stop Hatton here. Anything less and his world credentials are questionable.

Alvarez did not stop him. He hard to stop.

jessi · Post by **jessi** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:49

deadpan wrote:Brook should really stop Hatton here. Anything less and his world credentials are questionable.

Thank you, kell has to stop him.

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:50

deadpan wrote:Brook should really stop Hatton here. Anything less and his world credentials are questionable.

Bollocks.

ShadrachSimmo · Post by **ShadrachSimmo** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:50

jessi wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:
jessi wrote:I'm gona get laughed at here but I don't care, FRANKIE GAVIN beats kell brook !
What at?
What's your point, it's not funny !

My point is Frankie Gavin wouldn't beat any of these boys. At boxing.

deadpan · Post by **deadpan** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:50

I stand by my opinion.

jessi · Post by **jessi** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:51

leforge wrote:
deadpan wrote:Brook should really stop Hatton here. Anything less and his world credentials are questionable.
Alvarez did not stop him. He hard to stop.

I understand his durable, but he had him in trouble 7 rounds ago.

jessi · Post by **jessi** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:52

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
jessi wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote: What at?
What's your point, it's not funny !
My point is Frankie Gavin wouldn't beat any of these boys. At boxing.

Ok mate, Frankie Gavin won't beat Matthew hatton ? Ok mate

deadpan · Post by **deadpan** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:52

Is this what the Hearns expected when they made the fight? A points win over the man who was life and death with an 87 year old Ndou?

bfchunk · Post by **bfchunk** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:53

keithmoonhangover wrote:
deadpan wrote:Brook should really stop Hatton here. Anything less and his world credentials are questionable.
Bollocks.

with bells on

bfchunk · Post by **bfchunk** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:54

Lol at the wrong fighters there

crusader · Post by **crusader** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:54

deadpan · Post by **deadpan** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:55

x2

they looked mean though

ShadrachSimmo · Post by **ShadrachSimmo** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:55

jessi wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:
jessi wrote:What's your point, it's not funny !
My point is Frankie Gavin wouldn't beat any of these boys. At boxing.
Ok mate, Frankie Gavin won't beat Matthew hatton ? Ok mate

If alvarez and Brook cant stop him i doubt Frankie could.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:57

This guy is very poor at announcing the winners of fights.

reggaereggae · Post by **reggaereggae** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:58

The Dark Destroyer wrote:Hatton and Brook changed races.

ShadrachSimmo · Post by **ShadrachSimmo** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:58

Horse wrote:This guy is very poor at announcing the winners of fights.

If it's not on his cards he doesn't know the answer.

jessi · Post by **jessi** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:58

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
jessi wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote: My point is Frankie Gavin wouldn't beat any of these boys. At boxing.
Ok mate, Frankie Gavin won't beat Matthew hatton ? Ok mate
If alvarez and Brook cant stop him i doubt Frankie could.

Gavins volume of punches and accuracy would have the ref step in I promise you, don't be supprised to see the fight made this year.

deadpan · Post by **deadpan** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:59

Nail me to the floor for my lack of partisan zeal, but I really don't see Kell besting Jones, Ortiz, Berto and the like.

And Khan would 116-112 UD him.

milpool · Post by **milpool** » 17 Mar 2012, 19:59

Horse wrote:This guy is very poor at announcing the winners of fights.

Yeah, he was very matter of fact about it. Could he have read the scores out any quicker?

Anyway, no surprise in the result.

tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R

Re: tonights R by R