WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post Reply
Boxing Addict
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 14 Dec 2005, 07:35

WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by Boxing Addict »

? Is \Morales too old and past it

From what i've seen of danny his not really a mover, so morales slow legs might not mean as much

Weekend opinion

Kell were good but this is still domestic level, matthew is a domestic level fighter, he seems hard to nail and puches from weird angles, power doesn't look devastating but hits hard enough.

They need to test him against a world class opponent, malignaggi would have been excellent

Macklin made the fight easier than i expected by boxing rather than slugging. I reckon he could have stood more of a punchers chance if he just went in there trying to ko sergio, sergio showed that he has the power to beat any middleweight, his hand speed and accuracy is brilliant. I reckon the Barker fight was harder for martinez. Martinez now needs to fight the other so called champions instead of making these meaningless defences
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by Yes We Can »

Boxing Addict wrote:They need to test him against a world class opponent, malignaggi would have been excellent
Malignaggi is not a world class opponent. He is now, at best a gatekeeper, that is smaller than Matty Hatton and with even less of a punch if possible.
Boxing Addict wrote:? Is \Morales too old and past it
I think Morales can get a tight decision here, I'm thinking with a similar fight occcuring to the Maidana bout with a more limited and less powerful & strong guy against him. loses a few early, but as Garcia slows down, Morales backs him up and starts hurting him big with methodical boxing and counterpunching.
Boxing Addict wrote:Macklin made the fight easier than i expected by boxing rather than slugging
If anything i think Macklin proved that Martinez is not an elite level boxer, more a fast and awkward guy. Mack had far more success with this boxing tactic than he ever would have had swarming Sergio.

Seriously believe Martinez takes a lesson in boxing from Lara should they meet, and wouldn't completely rule out Martin Murray being able to blend the BArker/Macklin tactics nicely to push Martinez really bloody close (FWIW i consider Murray to be the weaker of the 3 brits, but think he has enough all round to trouble Martinez, or make him look utterly average)
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Boxing Addict wrote:? Is \Morales too old and past it

From what i've seen of danny his not really a mover, so morales slow legs might not mean as much

Weekend opinion

Kell were good but this is still domestic level, matthew is a domestic level fighter, he seems hard to nail and puches from weird angles, power doesn't look devastating but hits hard enough.

They need to test him against a world class opponent, malignaggi would have been excellent

Macklin made the fight easier than i expected by boxing rather than slugging. I reckon he could have stood more of a punchers chance if he just went in there trying to ko sergio, sergio showed that he has the power to beat any middleweight, his hand speed and accuracy is brilliant. I reckon the Barker fight was harder for martinez. Martinez now needs to fight the other so called champions instead of making these meaningless defences
I think if Macklin tried to brawl, the end would have come even sooner, as soon as Macklin put him down, Martinez turned on the heat, he would have done the same, but even earlier, I just dont think Macklin had the tools or experience to deal with him.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by Horse »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think if Macklin tried to brawl, the end would have come even sooner, as soon as Macklin put him down, Martinez turned on the heat, he would have done the same, but even earlier, I just dont think Macklin had the tools or experience to deal with him.
"Even sooner" & "even earlier"?

You make it seem like Macklin was bombed out early instead of getting stopped at the end of the 11th round.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Stop being pedantic, is sooner and earlier enough.

Fact is, Martinez would have won no matter what Macklin did, he is more experienced, faster, hits harder, is more versatile, and much smarter.

No shame in that, Martinez is a very special fighter.

Macklin is a very good fighter, Martinez a great one.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by Horse »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Stop being pedantic, is sooner and earlier enough.

Fact is, Martinez would have won no matter what Macklin did, he is more experienced, faster, hits harder, is more versatile, and much smarter.

No shame in that, Martinez is a very special fighter.

Macklin is a very good fighter, Martinez a great one.
You can call it pedantic if you want, but what you said was unfairly demeaning to Macklin.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by states »

Christ, you're hard work at times.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by Datsue »

states wrote:Christ, you're hard work at times.
"At times"? Horse will worry absolutely any statement like a starving dog on a bone just for the sake of it, & you say "at times"?

You can call it pedantic if you want, but I feel your statement was unfairly demeaning to Horse.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by states »

Datsue wrote:
states wrote:Christ, you're hard work at times.
"At times"? Horse will worry absolutely any statement like a starving dog on a bone just for the sake of it, & you say "at times"?

You can call it pedantic if you want, but I feel your statement was unfairly demeaning to Horse.
At the time, Horse had only queried one point. If I'd seen him query more posts this month, I could elevate him to 'all the time'.
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by lefthook82 »

@states, i think datsue is jesting

As for Morales, I thought he'd be leaving the ring on a stretcher against Maidana but Maidana was more buzzed in the fight than he was

So after that, not writing him off
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by crusader »

I'm giiving Morales a chance, but I don't think that he'll win.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by Datsue »

lefthook82 wrote:@states, i think datsue is jesting

Well spotted mate, thanks. I shall maybe try to be less subtle next time.

Or you know, funnier. One or the other.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by states »

I knew he was. Clearly we both need to step up.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by J »

defo the sarcasm on this board needs to step up.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Who is this Give, and why does Morales belong to him?

Wait - Give IS Morales??? :o

Who gives Give's Morales a chance??? Not me, Morales doesn't answer to anyone.

On the other hand if Give IS Morales, I'm not sure, are we talking alter ego? If the mysterious Give can inject some of the old Morales into Morales, maybe he does have a chance.
Last edited by Bard of Boxrec on 19 Mar 2012, 13:22, edited 1 time in total.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: WHO GIVE'S MORALES A CHANCE NEXT WEEK?

Post by Counter-puncher »

Datsue wrote:
states wrote:Christ, you're hard work at times.
"At times"? Horse will worry absolutely any statement like a starving dog on a bone just for the sake of it, & you say "at times"?

You can call it pedantic if you want, but I feel your statement was unfairly demeaning to Horse.

:bow:

horse is p4p
Post Reply