Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
Size is against Chavez, too. As are speed and hitting power.
Only Elmer and the odd JC Superstar fanatic would write it off as a given.
Only Elmer and the odd JC Superstar fanatic would write it off as a given.
-
AngryGoon38
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Oscar's style would always give Julio trouble. His thinking deficiency isn't as much of an issue because Chavez constant pressure will keep him reacting instead of thinking. And contrary to what dolts like Elmer want to believe, Oscar was not short in toughness. Great as Chavez was, he NEVER beat a fighter the quality of DelaHoya. It's absurd to just hand it to him.
Good Post. Good points. Needless to say,i definately agree ! 8)
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
De La hoya- and close to his prime Chavez would have been interesting.
however, if you look at the rest of elmers list, most of those fights were pretty even.
Some of the original list would have been pretty even;y matched fights, some would not have been.
I think Benvenuti would beat Hamsho, Zale would have beat Roldan almost ever time , and Bowe would have won a one-sided win over Klitschko.
Sanchez-Pep would have been great.
I think Saddler-Sanchez would have been great as well. A few more that would have been pretty even:
Tunney-Moore
McLarnin-Napoles
Harada-Olivares
Cerdan-Giardello
Rodriquez-Benitez
Starling-Quartey
Canzoneri-Beau Jack
Ferguson-Bert Cooper![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
however, if you look at the rest of elmers list, most of those fights were pretty even.
Some of the original list would have been pretty even;y matched fights, some would not have been.
I think Benvenuti would beat Hamsho, Zale would have beat Roldan almost ever time , and Bowe would have won a one-sided win over Klitschko.
Sanchez-Pep would have been great.
I think Saddler-Sanchez would have been great as well. A few more that would have been pretty even:
Tunney-Moore
McLarnin-Napoles
Harada-Olivares
Cerdan-Giardello
Rodriquez-Benitez
Starling-Quartey
Canzoneri-Beau Jack
Ferguson-Bert Cooper
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
A fighter of De La Hoya's class could never beat a machine like the great Julio Cesar Chavez. I don't even think he could beat Meldrick Taylor. DLH was not that good.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Size is against Chavez, too. As are speed and hitting power.
Only Elmer and the odd JC Superstar fanatic would write it off as a given.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
No, it would have been just as one-sided in the opposite direction, with Chavez KOing hin in four rounds...right, elmer?foxy01 wrote:I am not so sure Elmer, but one thing is sure, prime for prime at 140 it would have been a lot closer than the 2 they had when JCC was declining.elmersalsa wrote:A fighter of De La Hoya's class could never beat a machine like the great Julio Cesar Chavez. I don't even think he could beat Meldrick Taylor. DLH was not that good.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Size is against Chavez, too. As are speed and hitting power.
Only Elmer and the odd JC Superstar fanatic would write it off as a given.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
Definately DLH does not had the skills, the necessary skills to beat a guy so magnificent like Julio Cesar Chavez....It's like a Double A league playing the Major Leagues or a Toyota to be compared with a Ferrari or somethin like that.Goodnight, Irene wrote:No, it would have been just as one-sided in the opposite direction, with Chavez KOing hin in four rounds...right, elmer?foxy01 wrote:I am not so sure Elmer, but one thing is sure, prime for prime at 140 it would have been a lot closer than the 2 they had when JCC was declining.elmersalsa wrote: A fighter of De La Hoya's class could never beat a machine like the great Julio Cesar Chavez. I don't even think he could beat Meldrick Taylor. DLH was not that good.
There is no doubt in my mind, that at 140lbs, DLH could NOT beat these guys:
Carlos Ortiz
Antonio Cervantes
Wilfred Benitez
Nicolino Locche
Aaron Pryor
Duilio Loi
Jose "Mantequilla" Napoles ( the 60s version fought at jr welter)
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
The Fact remains that Chavez never beat a fighter as good as Oscar.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
Say what???SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The Fact remains that Chavez never beat a fighter as good as Oscar.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
I agree De La Hoya probably wouldnt beat (most of) those guys, Elmer...trouble is nearly all of them were better men than Chavez he wouldnt beat either 
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
Now you are going too much, or a little too much to the left, now. Chavez could hang with any all-time great, including the great Roberto Duran, from 130lbs to 140lbs.Goodnight, Irene wrote:I agree De La Hoya probably wouldnt beat (most of) those guys, Elmer...trouble is nearly all of them were better men than Chavez he wouldnt beat either
Chavez was very good and he should be placed where he should be...He got credentials. Now to say that Chavez NEVER BEAT someone as good as Oscar that is waaaayyy out of the line. What that person was smoking?
Oscar is not in Chavez' class. That is like a Ferrari compared to a Toyota.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
You seem to overlook some serious issues for Chavez which exist REGARDLESS of whether you imagine De La Hoya in Chavez's class or not.
De La Hoya is BIGGER
De La Hoya is FASTER
De La Hoya is A HEAVIER PUNCHER
De La Hoya is MORE ADAPTABLE
De La Hoya is AT A STYLE ADVANTAGE
In a clash at 140, its a fight...to everyones eyes but yours, mate.
De La Hoya is BIGGER
De La Hoya is FASTER
De La Hoya is A HEAVIER PUNCHER
De La Hoya is MORE ADAPTABLE
De La Hoya is AT A STYLE ADVANTAGE
In a clash at 140, its a fight...to everyones eyes but yours, mate.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
DLH is clumsierGoodnight, Irene wrote:You seem to overlook some serious issues for Chavez which exist REGARDLESS of whether you imagine De La Hoya in Chavez's class or not.
De La Hoya is BIGGER
De La Hoya is FASTER
De La Hoya is A HEAVIER PUNCHER
De La Hoya is MORE ADAPTABLE
De La Hoya is AT A STYLE ADVANTAGE
In a clash at 140, its a fight...to everyones eyes but yours, mate.
DLH technique is INFERIOR
DLH was never the bigger puncher
DLH was never a style advantage for the great Julio Cesar Chavez
DLH caught Chavez at the end of his career. He was ready to be taken.
DLH does not know to fight inside.
Prime Chavez was one of the best that I have ever seen.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
Nope, it's the truth. As painful as it might be for you to accept, Oscar was a better fighter than Rosario, Ramirez, Lockridge, LaPorte, etc..elmersalsa wrote:Say what???SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The Fact remains that Chavez never beat a fighter as good as Oscar.![]()
![]()
Is this is a joke?
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
Who was better? Bring the humor.elmersalsa wrote:N Now to say that Chavez NEVER BEAT someone as good as Oscar that is waaaayyy out of the line. What that person was smoking?Goodnight, Irene wrote:I agree De La Hoya probably wouldnt beat (most of) those guys, Elmer...trouble is nearly all of them were better men than Chavez he wouldnt beat either
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
elmersalsa wrote:DLH is clumsierGoodnight, Irene wrote:You seem to overlook some serious issues for Chavez which exist REGARDLESS of whether you imagine De La Hoya in Chavez's class or not.
De La Hoya is BIGGER
De La Hoya is FASTER
De La Hoya is A HEAVIER PUNCHER
De La Hoya is MORE ADAPTABLE
De La Hoya is AT A STYLE ADVANTAGE
In a clash at 140, its a fight...to everyones eyes but yours, mate.
DLH technique is INFERIOR
DLH was never the bigger puncher
DLH was never a style advantage for the great Julio Cesar Chavez
DLH caught Chavez at the end of his career. He was ready to be taken.
DLH does not know to fight inside.
Prime Chavez was one of the best that I have ever seen.
This is laughable. While I rate DLH as the inferior boxer without a doubt but Chavez at no point in his career beats him. DLH was too strong. KOing Meldrick Taylor and KOing Fernando Vargas are two different measures of power. While Vargas is really a bum compared to Chavez, Chavez would've been murdered by him at 154.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
You must be out of your mind. I don't see Oscar whupping none of those guys above. They were very good.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Nope, it's the truth. As painful as it might be for you to accept, Oscar was a better fighter than Rosario, Ramirez, Lockridge, LaPorte, etc..elmersalsa wrote:Say what???SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The Fact remains that Chavez never beat a fighter as good as Oscar.![]()
![]()
Is this is a joke?
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
What are you saying is LAUGHABLE. At no point in Chavez career he does not beat DLH? Say what? How you forgotten how magnificent Julio was between 130 and 140lbs?IKSRTFO wrote:elmersalsa wrote:DLH is clumsierGoodnight, Irene wrote:You seem to overlook some serious issues for Chavez which exist REGARDLESS of whether you imagine De La Hoya in Chavez's class or not.
De La Hoya is BIGGER
De La Hoya is FASTER
De La Hoya is A HEAVIER PUNCHER
De La Hoya is MORE ADAPTABLE
De La Hoya is AT A STYLE ADVANTAGE
In a clash at 140, its a fight...to everyones eyes but yours, mate.
DLH technique is INFERIOR
DLH was never the bigger puncher
DLH was never a style advantage for the great Julio Cesar Chavez
DLH caught Chavez at the end of his career. He was ready to be taken.
DLH does not know to fight inside.
Prime Chavez was one of the best that I have ever seen.
This is laughable. While I rate DLH as the inferior boxer without a doubt but Chavez at no point in his career beats him. DLH was too strong. KOing Meldrick Taylor and KOing Fernando Vargas are two different measures of power. While Vargas is really a bum compared to Chavez, Chavez would've been murdered by him at 154.
DLH fights Chavez in a 3 fight series at 140lbs he loses them all. There is no way.
Chavez won't be murdered by Vargas, either. Vargas was not that good.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
The idea that Chavez hit harder than De La Hoya at 140 and he could go upto 154 and fight Vargas on even terms sums up the absurdity of it all, really...
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
You forgot that Chavez is only 5'7" and DLH was 5'10"...Of course, going up in weight, it will favor DLH. But from 140lbs on down, IT FAVORS CHAVEZ.... I cannot see this guy beating someone as great as Chavez between 130 and 140lbs... Not in the 1984-90 time frame, which was Chavez' best years. Not at all.Goodnight, Irene wrote:The idea that Chavez hit harder than De La Hoya at 140 and he could go upto 154 and fight Vargas on even terms sums up the absurdity of it all, really...
Heck, DLH could not even beat a guy like John John Molina. Molina got robbed. If you say that Molina is equal to Chavez, I will end this right now. Keep dreaming.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
I'll take that opportunity...Molina is equal to Chavez.
Elmer, leaving all the rest aside, and the fact I like you, you have NO CLUE WHATSOEVER on how to score a fight. Marquez whupped in his second bout with Pacquiao, Norton flat-robbed in his second fight with Ali...now, Molina robbed against De La Hoya.
If it werent so stupid (and earnest), itd be funny.
Elmer, leaving all the rest aside, and the fact I like you, you have NO CLUE WHATSOEVER on how to score a fight. Marquez whupped in his second bout with Pacquiao, Norton flat-robbed in his second fight with Ali...now, Molina robbed against De La Hoya.
If it werent so stupid (and earnest), itd be funny.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15690
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
I got to go...This is very RIDICULOUS

-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
Juan Laporte is greater than DelaHoya?elmersalsa wrote:You must be out of your mind. I don't see Oscar whupping none of those guys above. They were very good.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Nope, it's the truth. As painful as it might be for you to accept, Oscar was a better fighter than Rosario, Ramirez, Lockridge, LaPorte, etc..elmersalsa wrote: Say what???![]()
![]()
Is this is a joke?
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Very Indecisive Hypotheticals
Damn straight! 