Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/mitche ... -next-rock
According to lightsoot (via the EBU), the promoters are 'in negotiations'.
If it happened, who would win?
I really like both of these fighters.
According to lightsoot (via the EBU), the promoters are 'in negotiations'.
If it happened, who would win?
I really like both of these fighters.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Kevin via range and workrate, especially late on. I think he could keep moving and have Gavin chasing him.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Yep they are both really good to watch. Interesting. Warren was talking about making the Mitchell-Burns fight on Bunce's show last night.
Really tough call, I wonder if Mitchell hits too hard for Rees? Gavin is no fool mind, a lovely boxer full of energy. This is every bit as good (from the point of view of the spectator) as either of them fighting Burns.
Really tough call, I wonder if Mitchell hits too hard for Rees? Gavin is no fool mind, a lovely boxer full of energy. This is every bit as good (from the point of view of the spectator) as either of them fighting Burns.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Late stoppage for Mitchell.
Rees holds his own at the start and surprises Mitchell with his speed, looking very comfortable at times. But he will start to slow down and tire after 5/6 at which stage Mitchell takes over and finishes a knackered, battered Rees in about 10. Everyone comments on what a good fight it was
Rees holds his own at the start and surprises Mitchell with his speed, looking very comfortable at times. But he will start to slow down and tire after 5/6 at which stage Mitchell takes over and finishes a knackered, battered Rees in about 10. Everyone comments on what a good fight it was
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Great fight if it comes off
Im on the fence on this one
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
kevins a bit of a bully, reckon he might get a bit of a shock with gavin. hes one of the gamest fighters i can think of.
So many people overate mitchell.
So many people overate mitchell.
-
Newport Daz
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 687
- Joined: 31 Aug 2010, 07:26
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Don't think Mitchell will have the power to hurt Rees seeing that Rees has been in with world class light welters. At lightweight Rees is very good. I see him either stopping Mitchell late or comfprtable UD.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Rees all day long. I like Kev's op-ed pieces but I think a professional fighter -- though a lightweight like Gav would be giving away a lot of weight -- would wear him down & take him out. But then again Mitchell's really good at convoluted metaphors & you never know, the Welshman might get lost in amongst one & end up befuddled.
But yeah. The Guardian'll need a new boxing hack after this one...
But yeah. The Guardian'll need a new boxing hack after this one...
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
I think Rees could get to mitchell like katsidis did. Gav carries some decent power at lightweight. Mitchell can be hurt too.
I like both guys. It's potential fight of the year.
I like both guys. It's potential fight of the year.
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
X2Scottrf wrote:Kevin via range and workrate, especially late on. I think he could keep moving and have Gavin chasing him.
Any result would be possible with such a tasty match up. Really hope this one comes off.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Kevin Mitchell would destroy Gavin Rees and i would bet my last penny on it 
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Poor boy! lolPizzaKid wrote:Kevin Mitchell would destroy Gavin Rees and i would bet my last penny on it
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
I have to agree on both accounts. Kevin is a good fighter, no doubt about that but I think some British fans, not all, rate him way higher than is necessarily true. Put that down to any of the following, good match making, popular East End fan base or because he is British.stevieb_8006 wrote:kevins a bit of a bully, reckon he might get a bit of a shock with gavin. hes one of the gamest fighters i can think of.
So many people overate mitchell.
Gavin is a tough cookie. Tough fight to call. I need to think on this, if it comes off. One thing though, I would not fancy either of them against Burns at the mo.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Actually, Kev 'The Hack-saw' Mitchell is even smaller than Rees. True story. However, on condition that I take over his Guardian role - including the tennis - I really hope the BBBoC sanction it.Datsue wrote:Rees all day long. I like Kev's op-ed pieces but I think a professional fighter -- though a lightweight like Gav would be giving away a lot of weight -- would wear him down & take him out. But then again Mitchell's really good at convoluted metaphors & you never know, the Welshman might get lost in amongst one & end up befuddled.
But yeah. The Guardian'll need a new boxing hack after this one...
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Would be a great fight if it was to come off, I would lean towards Mitchell with a close points win
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Kevin "The Pen" Mitchell is ranked #14 by the WBO at 135lbds on the basis of this thread.dondada wrote:Actually, Kev 'The Hack-saw' Mitchell is even smaller than Rees. True story. However, on condition that I take over his Guardian role - including the tennis - I really hope the BBBoC sanction it.Datsue wrote:Rees all day long. I like Kev's op-ed pieces but I think a professional fighter -- though a lightweight like Gav would be giving away a lot of weight -- would wear him down & take him out. But then again Mitchell's really good at convoluted metaphors & you never know, the Welshman might get lost in amongst one & end up befuddled.
But yeah. The Guardian'll need a new boxing hack after this one...
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Defo potential for a very good fight. You could argue both are on the fringes of world class. Like someone commented earlier i think Burns beats them both.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
On the contrary, I'd strongly fancy Rees to beat Burns...ShadrachSimmo wrote:Defo potential for a very good fight. You could argue both are on the fringes of world class. Like someone commented earlier i think Burns beats them both.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Anyone who underestimates a motivated Rees is a fool.
but the same can also be said of Burns.
To me it is a better styles mesh than Mitchell.
And I like Mitchell too.
great trio.
but the same can also be said of Burns.
To me it is a better styles mesh than Mitchell.
And I like Mitchell too.
great trio.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
dondada wrote:On the contrary, I'd strongly fancy Rees to beat Burns...ShadrachSimmo wrote:Defo potential for a very good fight. You could argue both are on the fringes of world class. Like someone commented earlier i think Burns beats them both.
Think Mitchell would make a good fight out Burns too.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Not sure about this one today after seeing on Twitter that Kevin has been told he is next out against Burns in July.
He is off to Canada on Saturday to begin a training camp.
He is off to Canada on Saturday to begin a training camp.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
I don't really see Rees beating Burns. Again I think Rees would have plenty of success early but once he starts to slow down after 4 or so rounds, Burns would take over. He has proved he can keep a fight at distance for 12 rounds and with his height advantage, chin and extra workrate I just can't see how Rees wins this.
I think it would be a great fight as I think Rees would trouble anyone early in a fight. But Matthews had a little success in their short fight and Watson & Murray had spells on top once Rees slowed down, no offence to those guys but I think Burns is at a very different level.
I think it would be a great fight as I think Rees would trouble anyone early in a fight. But Matthews had a little success in their short fight and Watson & Murray had spells on top once Rees slowed down, no offence to those guys but I think Burns is at a very different level.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Fair point. I think the only thing that beats Rees is a big puncher with a high work rate. Ricky has the work rate, I'm not sure he has the required dig. Would be cracking fight mind, great combination of fights to be made.Lenny wrote:I don't really see Rees beating Burns. Again I think Rees would have plenty of success early but once he starts to slow down after 4 or so rounds, Burns would take over. He has proved he can keep a fight at distance for 12 rounds and with his height advantage, chin and extra workrate I just can't see how Rees wins this.
I think it would be a great fight as I think Rees would trouble anyone early in a fight. But Matthews had a little success in their short fight and Watson & Murray had spells on top once Rees slowed down, no offence to those guys but I think Burns is at a very different level.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
If the Rock's got his engine sorted, and Mitchell's got his boxing brain in gear, this is an absolute mouth watering fight.
I couldn't call it.
I couldn't call it.
Re: Gavin Rees v Kevin Mitchell?
Agreed, would like to see John Murray back involved as well, always felt he and Rees would be an absolute cracker. Rees would embarrass him in those early rounds but could Murray tough it out and catch up to him? The main thing is that no combination of the 4 would turn out to be a dull fight imoJamesH wrote:Fair point. I think the only thing that beats Rees is a big puncher with a high work rate. Ricky has the work rate, I'm not sure he has the required dig. Would be cracking fight mind, great combination of fights to be made.Lenny wrote:I don't really see Rees beating Burns. Again I think Rees would have plenty of success early but once he starts to slow down after 4 or so rounds, Burns would take over. He has proved he can keep a fight at distance for 12 rounds and with his height advantage, chin and extra workrate I just can't see how Rees wins this.
I think it would be a great fight as I think Rees would trouble anyone early in a fight. But Matthews had a little success in their short fight and Watson & Murray had spells on top once Rees slowed down, no offence to those guys but I think Burns is at a very different level.