Everybody has fav fighters and are entitled to an opinion, but words like you used to describe it are disrespectful. In my opinion Nas would out box him, Selkirk fights in straight lines and loads up sometimes, his defense is not the best, but he does have power and he is massive for the weight and very strong, takes the centre of the ring well, good on the front foot, but not so good on the back foot, Nasser is only 22 and only 40% of what he will be in 3 or 4 years time when he reaches his peak, so more mileage left. Nasser has never been badly hurt or dropped as an amateur or pro and is very tough. Most people would pick Selkirk because he is more well known and a much bigger man, but if he fought Nasser at 11st on the day he would be in a lot of trouble.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Im always an early birdsafeerah wrote:I meant Trolling the forums early, It was a joke mate.Tommy Gunn13 wrote: Hows that trolling,me saying Selkirk would beat him!!!![]()
Ive put a poll up to see who people think,im not saying your boy isnt a good fighter but i dont believe he would live with Selkirk thats all
Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
F**k off you tool, what words??safeerah wrote:Everybody has fav fighters and are entitled to an opinion, but words like you used to describe it are disrespectful. In my opinion Nas would out box him, Selkirk fights in straight lines and loads up sometimes, his defense is not the best, but he does have power and he is massive for the weight and very strong, takes the centre of the ring well, good on the front foot, but not so good on the back foot, Nasser is only 22 and only 40% of what he will be in 3 or 4 years time when he reaches his peak, so more mileage left. Nasser has never been badly hurt or dropped as an amateur or pro and is very tough. Most people would pick Selkirk because he is more well known and a much bigger man, but if he fought Nasser at 11st on the day he would be in a lot of trouble.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Im always an early birdsafeerah wrote:I meant Trolling the forums early, It was a joke mate.![]()
Ive put a poll up to see who people think,im not saying your boy isnt a good fighter but i dont believe he would live with Selkirk thats all
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Internet gangster lolTommy Gunn13 wrote:F**k off you tool, what words??safeerah wrote:Everybody has fav fighters and are entitled to an opinion, but words like you used to describe it are disrespectful. In my opinion Nas would out box him, Selkirk fights in straight lines and loads up sometimes, his defense is not the best, but he does have power and he is massive for the weight and very strong, takes the centre of the ring well, good on the front foot, but not so good on the back foot, Nasser is only 22 and only 40% of what he will be in 3 or 4 years time when he reaches his peak, so more mileage left. Nasser has never been badly hurt or dropped as an amateur or pro and is very tough. Most people would pick Selkirk because he is more well known and a much bigger man, but if he fought Nasser at 11st on the day he would be in a lot of trouble.Tommy Gunn13 wrote: Im always an early bird![]()
Ive put a poll up to see who people think,im not saying your boy isnt a good fighter but i dont believe he would live with Selkirk thats all
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Internet gangster
i dont need to hide my proper name in on twitter if u want to look..u biased knoob ![[icon_knockout.gif] :KO:](./images/smilies/icon_knockout.gif)
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
so is Tommy gun your name lolTommy Gunn13 wrote:Internet gangster![]()
i dont need to hide my proper name in on twitter if u want to look..u biased knoob
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
@TommyGunn13 is my twitter name,ul find my real name there,i got no need to hide under an aliassafeerah wrote:so is Tommy gun your name lolTommy Gunn13 wrote:Internet gangster![]()
i dont need to hide my proper name in on twitter if u want to look..u biased knoob
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
West End Rocker and Junior, good picks for this afternoon.
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Junior is a good pick. I hear "according to Pete" is in with a shout too and at 33/1 its worth a fiver of anyone's money.smoggy7188 wrote:West End Rocker and Junior, good picks for this afternoon.
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
im waiting abit longer to see what the weather does, few good horses like it soft so dont want to spend the cash then have it tonk it down like yesterday.
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
What about the derby semi ?smoggy7188 wrote:West End Rocker and Junior, good picks for this afternoon.
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
LolTommy Gunn13 wrote:@TommyGunn13 is my twitter name,ul find my real name there,i got no need to hide under an aliassafeerah wrote:so is Tommy gun your name lolTommy Gunn13 wrote:Internet gangster![]()
i dont need to hide my proper name in on twitter if u want to look..u biased knoob
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
There the ones i done,do u follow me on twittersmoggy7188 wrote:West End Rocker and Junior, good picks for this afternoon.
Oh yeah i put my name there
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Was seeing what buncey was saying bout last night and i saw a tommy gunn.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Coolsmoggy7188 wrote:Was seeing what buncey was saying bout last night and i saw a tommy gunn.
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Lolsmoggy7188 wrote:Was seeing what buncey was saying bout last night and i saw a tommy gunn.
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
My son has a Tommy Gun, won't be separated from it.safeerah wrote:Lolsmoggy7188 wrote:Was seeing what buncey was saying bout last night and i saw a tommy gunn.
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
a poor fight saw lowe get stopped by jamie ball mids title in 7 rounds. ochieng should b defending english title against ball or nasser al harbi who fought an eliminator was a tec draw after 3 completed rounds nas cut in the 4th round was a close fight( i had nas 2-1 up). either fighter should get a shot at ochieng.
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Ball is getting married, so it should be Nasser, we could have defending against Ball, what was the point of an eliminator if not.maley1984 wrote:a poor fight saw lowe get stopped by jamie ball mids title in 7 rounds. ochieng should b defending english title against ball or nasser al harbi who fought an eliminator was a tec draw after 3 completed rounds nas cut in the 4th round was a close fight( i had nas 2-1 up). either fighter should get a shot at ochieng.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
It wasnt a final eliminator was it?safeerah wrote:Ball is getting married, so it should be Nasser, we could have defending against Ball, what was the point of an eliminator if not.maley1984 wrote:a poor fight saw lowe get stopped by jamie ball mids title in 7 rounds. ochieng should b defending english title against ball or nasser al harbi who fought an eliminator was a tec draw after 3 completed rounds nas cut in the 4th round was a close fight( i had nas 2-1 up). either fighter should get a shot at ochieng.
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
It wasnt a final eliminator was it?[/quoteTommy Gunn13 wrote:safeerah wrote:Ball is getting married, so it should be Nasser, we could have defending against Ball, what was the point of an eliminator if not.maley1984 wrote:a poor fight saw lowe get stopped by jamie ball mids title in 7 rounds. ochieng should b defending english title against ball or nasser al harbi who fought an eliminator was a tec draw after 3 completed rounds nas cut in the 4th round was a close fight( i had nas 2-1 up). either fighter should get a shot at ochieng.
Once again you miss the point, 4 people were chosen for the English title Max Maxwell and Mark Lloyd to fight for the title and an eliminator between Nasser Al Harbi and Jamie Ball winner to fight the winner, Lloyd pulled out meant he lost consideration, because the eliminator was going to purse bids, neither Al Harbi or Ball could fight Maxwell, so quickly arranged fight for the English between Ochieng and Quigley, with the winner to fight Maxwell and the winner of that to face the winner of the Al Harbi and Ball, where has Lowe come from. Al Harbi and Ball put their unbeaten records on the line, for what, for a journeyman to get the shot ahead of them. Final eliminator you can't be serious, name one for the English title, can you ? Don't think so.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Calm down Safsafeerah wrote:It wasnt a final eliminator was it?[/quoteTommy Gunn13 wrote:safeerah wrote:Ball is getting married, so it should be Nasser, we could have defending against Ball, what was the point of an eliminator if not.
Once again you miss the point, 4 people were chosen for the English title Max Maxwell and Mark Lloyd to fight for the title and an eliminator between Nasser Al Harbi and Jamie Ball winner to fight the winner, Lloyd pulled out meant he lost consideration, because the eliminator was going to purse bids, neither Al Harbi or Ball could fight Maxwell, so quickly arranged fight for the English between Ochieng and Quigley, with the winner to fight Maxwell and the winner of that to face the winner of the Al Harbi and Ball, where has Lowe come from. Al Harbi and Ball put their unbeaten records on the line, for what, for a journeyman to get the shot ahead of them. Final eliminator you can't be serious, name one for the English title, can you ? Don't think so.
It was my mistake,i didnt read it properly..i thought British¬ English
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Come on Saf I have spoken to you about your passionate emotion, but its all good. Going back to Selkirk I think he would struggle to fight Light mid 11 stone for a belt, however he is dangerous but I think the politics of boxing gets to him, and if he doesnt get a break soon he'll find it hard to keep his weight downTommy Gunn13 wrote:Calm down Safsafeerah wrote:It wasnt a final eliminator was it?[/quoteTommy Gunn13 wrote:
Once again you miss the point, 4 people were chosen for the English title Max Maxwell and Mark Lloyd to fight for the title and an eliminator between Nasser Al Harbi and Jamie Ball winner to fight the winner, Lloyd pulled out meant he lost consideration, because the eliminator was going to purse bids, neither Al Harbi or Ball could fight Maxwell, so quickly arranged fight for the English between Ochieng and Quigley, with the winner to fight Maxwell and the winner of that to face the winner of the Al Harbi and Ball, where has Lowe come from. Al Harbi and Ball put their unbeaten records on the line, for what, for a journeyman to get the shot ahead of them. Final eliminator you can't be serious, name one for the English title, can you ? Don't think so.![]()
It was my mistake,i didnt read it properly..i thought British¬ English
Last edited by mcato on 14 Apr 2012, 11:51, edited 1 time in total.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Selkirk will contest titles at Light Middle i think,hes training with Bomber so no doubt hes training like a mad man..
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
It would be better for Selkirk to stay at Light mid because the Mid div is getting very busy with Prince Aaron,BJ Saunders, Cannonball, Ryder and all of the guys in the top Brit top 5Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Selkirk will contest titles at Light Middle i think,hes training with Bomber so no doubt hes training like a mad man..
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Froch Undercard- OCHIENG V AA LOWE (English Belt)
Light middle will be his weight id have thoughtmcato wrote:It would be better for Selkirk to stay at Light mid because the Mid div is getting very busy with Prince Aaron,BJ Saunders, Cannonball, Ryder and all of the guys in the top Brit top 5Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Selkirk will contest titles at Light Middle i think,hes training with Bomber so no doubt hes training like a mad man..