Greatest Heavyweight

Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Ezzard »

Ambling Alp wrote:The loss to Young has to be a factor against Foreman but you have to look at everyone's whole career. Foreman's win over Frazier was probably more impressive than anything that almost anyone else ever did. The blowout of Norton is underrated as well.
Theone has him number 2 h2h.

Foreman does well on accomplishments. I don’t think he does so well on h2h. Jimmy Young was a top talent but there are other top defensive masters who would have done the same thing to Foreman. I think George would lose to quite a few past greats and quite-goods.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Foreman would do excellently head-to-head.

Young got him at the right time.
JAMIE COLLETT
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 13
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 07:48

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by JAMIE COLLETT »

what about Joe Frazier ?
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by yancey »

JAMIE COLLETT wrote:what about Joe Frazier ?
Ah, someone with discernment.

:TU: :wink:
Last edited by yancey on 14 Apr 2012, 20:44, edited 1 time in total.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

"Discernment."
Brett Paul Dunbar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 61
Joined: 22 Jan 2002, 20:00

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Brett Paul Dunbar »

yancey wrote:Joe Frazier.

He prevailed on the biggest stage in boxing history, against a truly great fighter at a time when both men were nearest their peaks and fully aware that this was THE moment.
However, not that much later, he was demolished by Foreman, maybe Frazier had faded a bit but it wasn't even competitive. There was nothing to indicate that Frazier would ever have had a chance against Foreman. Frazier was always competitive against Ali due to his weaknesses being in areas Ali wasn't equipped to exploit (he was, for example, a horribly slow starter however Ali was also a slow starter).

I can't see Frazier beating Dempsey, Liston, Lewis or either Klitschko.

My choice is Lewis. When he took his opponent seriously, his combination of size and skill would give most heavyweights nightmares.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Brett Paul Dunbar wrote:
yancey wrote:Joe Frazier.

He prevailed on the biggest stage in boxing history, against a truly great fighter at a time when both men were nearest their peaks and fully aware that this was THE moment.
However, not that much later, he was demolished by Foreman, maybe Frazier had faded a bit but it wasn't even competitive. There was nothing to indicate that Frazier would ever have had a chance against Foreman. Frazier was always competitive against Ali due to his weaknesses being in areas Ali wasn't equipped to exploit (he was, for example, a horribly slow starter however Ali was also a slow starter).

I can't see Frazier beating Dempsey, Liston, Lewis or either Klitschko.

My choice is Lewis. When he took his opponent seriously, his combination of size and skill would give most heavyweights nightmares.
Where would you place Frazier in your top-10?

I have Frazier fairly high, at #6. I just laugh at him being top-3. He doesnt have a ghost of a case over Louis, Ali or Foreman...at least.
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Ambling Alp »

Take the following and have them fight each other once: Foreman,Johnson,Frazier,Holmes,Marciano,Dempsey, Holyfield, Lewis,Tyson,Jeffries,Liston. Thats 11 guys, and 10 fights for each fighter.
Every guy would probably lose two. Everyone would probably win at least two. They were all were great, but were not perfect. My guess is that Foreman would go 8-2.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Maybe losses to Holmes and Liston, Alp?
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Tomasino »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Maybe losses to Holmes and Liston, Alp?

Those are the only two I could pick over him although Jeffries could be in with a shout. Dempsey hasn't got a look in, vs Foreman or Frazier.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Dempsey would be up against it for Foreman for sure, but Id bet BIG on him to get to Frazier. Fraziers flaws compliment Dempsey's strengths wonderfully.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Tomasino »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Dempsey would be up against it for Foreman for sure, but Id bet BIG on him to get to Frazier. Fraziers flaws compliment Dempsey's strengths wonderfully.
Dempseys strengths are exaggerated. Joe would hammer him, inside the distance. Dempsey didn't have the stamina for a fight with Frazier, nor the chin.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Dempsey's stamina never gets the credit it deserves, but Id agree he wouldnt win a long-haul fight.

I just dont believe Frazier would make it that far. Its his chin, IMO, which would be the one crumbling. This battle would be over before Joe got a chance to smoke.
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Ambling Alp »

Frazier was a slow starter and would be in trouble with someone who was a big puncher and a fast starter, so Dempsey would be a very dangerous fight for him. (As would Tyson and Liston for Frazier).
I think Liston and Tyson are the big wildcards. They would be the underdog against most of the rest of the top guys but would have a serious punchers' chance against any of them. They would each score a couple of devastating knockouts but against who would be the big question. More often than not they would lose though. They would go something like 3-7 against the top guys in a round robin series.

I would pick Foreman over everyone except probably Holmes. Holmes was tough to hit and may be able to survive if he did get in serious trouble against Foreman.
Against the rest of the field I would favor Foreman but somewhere along the line he is going to lose. Somebody is going to survive the early rounds and beat Foreman. Still, he would probably have one of, if not the best record.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15648
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by elmersalsa »

Crease wrote:Rocky Marciano

Followed in any order: Frazier, Foreman, Dempsey, Johnson, Tyson
Jack Johnson, then Rocky Marciano.
llabwons
Cruiserweight
Posts: 34
Joined: 27 Dec 2010, 10:58

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by llabwons »

Holmes, a peak Ali is the only heavyweight that would've beaten Larry IMO.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Adamj1987 »

Holmes
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Ezzard »

Foreman would likely lose to Johnson, Holmes, Holyfield and a defensive minded Lewis.

He could conceivably lose to Jeanette, Wills, Tunney, Charles, Walcott (to varying degrees).

I'd have him as underdog against Liston.

Witherspoon, Schmeling and Vitali would be live underdogs.

Contests with Bowe and Dempsey might resemble the Lyle fight.

I'd start him as favourite against Jeffries, Marciano, Tyson and Wlad.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Ezzard wrote:Foreman would likely lose to Johnson, Holmes, Holyfield and a defensive minded Lewis.

He could conceivably lose to Jeanette, Wills, Tunney, Charles, Walcott (to varying degrees).

I'd have him as underdog against Liston.

Witherspoon, Schmeling and Vitali would be live underdogs.

Contests with Bowe and Dempsey might resemble the Lyle fight.

I'd start him as favourite against Jeffries, Marciano, Tyson and Wlad.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Its about an even split between Foreman & Holmes, then.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Controversial »

Ossie Ocasio, he beat Jimmy Young twice :-)
ben geoghegan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 151
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 22:33

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by ben geoghegan »

Johnson and Lewis , with Holmes and Peter Jackson not too far behind!
Rambo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 859
Joined: 10 May 2011, 20:25

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Rambo »

Mike Tyson: Hello
^
That's Mike Tyson saying hello
Zelley
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 298
Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 23:10

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Zelley »

1/ JAMES J CORBETT
The pioneer of good boxing in heavyweight fights.
His victory over the one-time bare knuckle fighter
JOHN L. SULLIVAN took boxing from back rooms, bars,
and barges on some river bank to a new beginning where
ring skills were necessary to win bouts.

2./BOB FITZSIMMONS
The first triple champion who opened the door for future greats
like HENRY ARMSTRONG.

Greatness is an interesting word, some associate it with ALI or
wrestler Gorgeous George or any other fighter that could claim
greatness. But, real greatness is the ability to change the future
for the better and CORBETT and FIZSIMMONS are logical pioneers
for heavyweight champions. Not sure the re-naming of an old trick
of laying back on the ropes and blocking punches is high on the great
moments in boxing history, but then greatness is just a word with so
many yardsticks. The trick is to decide first on the yardstick to measure
greatness.
Jake Hughes
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 22 Apr 2012, 16:46

Re: Greatest Heavyweight

Post by Jake Hughes »

Zelley wrote:1/ JAMES J CORBETT
The pioneer of good boxing in heavyweight fights.
His victory over the one-time bare knuckle fighter
JOHN L. SULLIVAN took boxing from back rooms, bars,
and barges on some river bank to a new beginning where
ring skills were necessary to win bouts.

2./BOB FITZSIMMONS
The first triple champion who opened the door for future greats
like HENRY ARMSTRONG.

Greatness is an interesting word, some associate it with ALI or
wrestler Gorgeous George or any other fighter that could claim
greatness. But, real greatness is the ability to change the future
for the better and CORBETT and FIZSIMMONS are logical pioneers
for heavyweight champions. Not sure the re-naming of an old trick
of laying back on the ropes and blocking punches is high on the great
moments in boxing history, but then greatness is just a word with so
many yardsticks. The trick is to decide first on the yardstick to measure
greatness.
Totally agree with all of the above assessments, and comments on greatness. Its impossible to literally pitch different era boxers against each other, even the self proclaiming Greatest admitted in the end that the best you can ever really say was that you were the greatest of your/their own time.

In that Larry Holmes and George Foreman kind of share a "their time" I can never see a prime Foreman beating a prime Holmes.

Gene Tunney, who so admired James J Corbett, to me always seems to be the missing link between the ground breaking Corbett and the modern day great Heavyweights of which Louis stands as the torchbearer. I like to think that Tunney would have found a way to beat all but Louis and Ali despite the shear size and power difference that the super Heavy’s of Holmes, Foreman and Frazier brought to bear.
Post Reply