Sky dump Hatton

elephant man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 104
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 13:00

Sky dump Hatton

Post by elephant man »

Ricky Hatton MBE ‏ @realrickyhatton
Just landed in hong kong.what a trek that was. Just landed and get a load of tweets of sympathy as people have found out that sky have Pulled the plug on my dates.thank you to all who have sent best wishes. I have a load of champions and a to stable so HP will consider other Avenues for my lads. I guess if you want loyalty by a dog.
Apparently their last show is June 16.


Matchroom on the other hand now have a whopping 20 fight deal with Sky.
elephant man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 104
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 13:00

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by elephant man »

Buncey not happy :box:

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
If Ricky's pals have stabbed him in the back and kicked him off Sky it is a total and utter disgrace.

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
This is not about Setanta or allegedly it is about doing the right thing. A disgrace by the dogs.

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
Hatton kept Sky going, kept boxing in the public eye and the people there claim to be his pals! Dogs, I would not be able to sleep tonight.

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
It's not about coverage - if they have one promoter with 80percent of their dates it is bad thing. It moves closer to a monopoly.

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
Can it really be true that Ricky Hatton has No Sky dates after Quigg and Munroe. That is a disgrace. Clearly never promised Rupert anything.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by Horse »

Would Channel 5 be interested in showing Hatton Promotions fights?
NazNaci1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4517
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 00:58

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by NazNaci1 »

Not sure C5 will pick up HP, seeing as they have Hennessey. I would hope so but given how little interest there is in the sport from the major broadcasters (C5 apart), doubtful.

Which then raise the question, where does HP go? Sure as hell won't be Allegedly Channel or SKY, so personally, I am a little unsure what happens.

Any idea on why SKY decided to drop Hatton & Co?
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Just proves that Hearn is skys Goldenboy,he prob threatened to take the darts elsewhere if he didn't get more dates..How can he fill more dates he hardly has any boxers,i suppose were going to see Hearn in co promotions a lot now?? No doubt that will be how Dave Coldwell gets a few dates(which im glad but not at Hattons exspense)

Got to Feel sorry for Hatton promotions who done things the hard way to get started,instead of Hearn who was givin everything on a plate from birth.. At least Eddies army of nut huggers will be happy....
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by jessi »

Can't see any reason why ch5 wouldn't be atleast interested ! Hattons stable have some good prospects and get matched evenly more often then most !
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by Final round »

A very LAZY, short sighted decision by Sky , Hatton promotions have put together some excellent cards. I hope they team up with BN.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by Old bones Ian »

there's no loyalty in boxing, we should all know that by now.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by JamesH »

elephant man wrote:Buncey not happy :box:

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
If Ricky's pals have stabbed him in the back and kicked him off Sky it is a total and utter disgrace.

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
This is not about Setanta or Allegedly channel it is about doing the right thing. A disgrace by the dogs.

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
Hatton kept Sky going, kept boxing in the public eye and the people there claim to be his pals! Dogs, I would not be able to sleep tonight.

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
It's not about coverage - if they have one promoter with 80percent of their dates it is bad thing. It moves closer to a monopoly.

Steve Bunce ‏ @bigdaddybunce
Can it really be true that Ricky Hatton has No Sky dates after Quigg and Munroe. That is a disgrace. Clearly never promised Rupert anything.
If Skys boxing has become so limited, does a subscription only boxing channel keep boxing in the public eye? Does it not move it closer to a monopoly? Was Karpency fighting Cleverly 'the right thing'? Has James De Gale been denied what was promised to him in a contract? Has JC been paid yet? Have all the other lads been squared up financially?

Boxing has its fair share of dogs. My take is simple, call them all for what they are, or shut your mouth.

That said, its does strike me as an odd decision by Sky, very odd. I thought Hatton Promotions were doing well.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by leforge »

Final round wrote:A very LAZY, short sighted decision by Sky , Hatton promotions have put together some excellent cards. I hope they team up with BN.
I am surprised by this. I think they go to 5 they have a much better stable than Hennessy plus Hatton name. allegedly is low viewers plus low pay from tv based on their current level of subcribers.
greenyox3
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1197
Joined: 20 Jul 2010, 16:53

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by greenyox3 »

Betrayed loyalties (get a dog) aside, I don't see how this could make sense for Sky unless they were pulling back their interest in boxing. Especially now Channel456 now has the exclusive contract to show GBP shows.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Premier Sports maybe?
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by The Insider »

What a shame. HP certainly deserve a break having done it the hard way and lost so much money in the early days. They're live shows on YouTube have seen some cracking small hall promotions which would have gone under the radar otherwise. HP always seemed to have a genuine interest in the small hall shows they covered too. Perhaps they could team up with another promotional outfit and take on the rest?
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by smoggy7188 »

hearn aint got enough fighters to fill 20shows has he? something must have happened behind the scenes for a decision like this to be made.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by DavidPayne »

Hearn essentially becomes Sky's boxing matchmaker. If he's got spare dates he can bid for fights etc non? Or work with other promoters like DC and RH to get shows made.

Could be monopoly, could be great. Depends on Hearn's judgement and willingness to to the right thing for all parties.
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by Bennyblanco »

Bad form from sky

Maybe hearns planning on signing the Olympians to boost his stable
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by smoggy7188 »

By the looks of twitter, sky only want top class fights, big names or massive bills with lots of title fights on. Looks like the days of an 8rounder as main undercard support and a mismatched title fight are over.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by JamesH »

DavidPayne makes a great point. It could go either way, this. I don't think being more stringent with quality is a bad thing, as long as the frequency isn't too affected (which it would probably be). Quite a big change to the boxing-on-tv landscape.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by DavidPayne »

So we can anticipate 26 bills per year.

20 for Hearn.

8 Prizefighters
2 Carl Froch
3 Kel Brook
2 Darren Barkers

5 remaining dates.

6 for Maloney

5 for Price

1 remaining -

So in effect Coldwell, Hatton and the less important attractions for Hearn and Maloney are now bidding for six dates or chief undercard slots on Froch, Brook, Barker and Price dates.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by smoggy7188 »

Id rather see Prizefighters not included in the boxing dates they give out and have it separate.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by leforge »

greenyox3 wrote:Betrayed loyalties (get a dog) aside, I don't see how this could make sense for Sky unless they were pulling back their interest in boxing. Especially now Channel456 now has the exclusive contract to show GBP shows.
How come berto v Ortiz is on sky!
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by DavidPayne »

I'd rather see Jada Fire shaking her arse on my desk but I'm afraid on the whole Prizefighters will be separate dates I would anticipate.

May be used occasionally as easy undercard like McCloskey.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by leforge »

Matchroom will be signing more fighters I am sure. I personally think no promotors should have contracts should be on fight by fight basis!
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by MightyWarrior »

If Sky are talking about upping the level of their shows, they need to ditch the B level prizefighter bollocks - Hearn is conning the gullible Smith with his recycled journeymen and has beens dressed up as a big event.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Sky dump Hatton

Post by dondada »

MightyWarrior wrote:If Sky are talking about upping the level of their shows, they need to ditch the B level prizefighter bollocks - Hearn is conning the gullible Smith with his recycled journeymen and has beens dressed up as a big event.
I do think it's an interesting and eye-catching format which has had some super scraps and good fighters in it.

But it does need to be used more sparingly, IMO...less is more and all that.
Post Reply