McCloskey Corley

magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1175
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: McCloskey Corley

Post by magnus »

THEBUTCH wrote::oo :oo :oo :oo :oo :shame: :shame: :shame:

I cannot believe the judges had McCloskey ahead. It was bad enough listening to Jim Watt and co try and tell us that McCloskey was in the fight. That is shocking. Shame because Paul seems a sound fella, but Corley, who is long since spent at world contention absolutely outclassed and outpunched him practically every step of the way.

I thought Chop Chop boxed a great fight, and credit him with keeping in tip-top condition.

The timing of the stoppage was spot on IMO, but the way it was handled reeked of giving the home boxer another opportunity to clear his head and carry on. John-Lewis knew the time was right, he should have stood by his gut feeling and been clear when he waved the fight off.
Indeed. Jim's squeaky over-reaction to the stoppage didn't help either. I find I watch most fights with the mute button on, so I can make my own mind up about who is winning.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1175
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: McCloskey Corley

Post by magnus »

THEBUTCH wrote::oo :oo :oo :oo :oo :shame: :shame: :shame:

I cannot believe the judges had McCloskey ahead. It was bad enough listening to Jim Watt and co try and tell us that McCloskey was in the fight. That is shocking. Shame because Paul seems a sound fella, but Corley, who is long since spent at world contention absolutely outclassed and outpunched him practically every step of the way.

I thought Chop Chop boxed a great fight, and credit him with keeping in tip-top condition.

The timing of the stoppage was spot on IMO, but the way it was handled reeked of giving the home boxer another opportunity to clear his head and carry on. John-Lewis knew the time was right, he should have stood by his gut feeling and been clear when he waved the fight off.
Indeed. Jim's squeaky over-reaction to the stoppage didn't help either. I find I watch most fights with the mute button on, so I can make my own mind up about who is winning.
dohboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 23 Sep 2010, 08:35

Re: McCloskey Corley

Post by dohboy »

jonny
Post subject: Re: McCloskey Corley
PostPosted: 07 May 2012, 11:54

Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 549
Anyone know what the scores were at the time of stoppage

McCloskey was up by 1,2 and 4 rounds
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6646
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: McCloskey Corley

Post by THEBUTCH »

Thank God Corley stopped him and we didn't get another rip off like the Prescott decision.

I will never comprehend how the judges had McCloskey winning that bout.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: McCloskey Corley

Post by TheCobra »

I do think the commentary affected how I saw this one. Sky were definitely being really biased and I couldn't help but be pulled into their way of seeing it, however having rewatched the fight I think Corley was winning by a couple of rounds at the time of the stoppage on any sensible card! How workrate was too low to take some of the later rounds and that's where McClosky started picking up rounds, but to have him ahead on all scorecards and one by 4 rounds, that's just shocking.
nh1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 153
Joined: 09 Sep 2008, 15:13

Re: McCloskey Corley

Post by nh1 »

THEBUTCH wrote:Thank God Corley stopped him and we didn't get another rip off like the Prescott decision.

I will never comprehend how the judges had McCloskey winning that bout.
Spot on: he lost clearly against Prescott and he was losing this one, too.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6646
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: McCloskey Corley

Post by THEBUTCH »

Agreed. Like other posters have mentioned, the reality is that McCloskey is top domestic class with a view to competing well at Euro level, and that's absolutely fine and a great achievement. The problem is you can always rely on Matchroom to blur reality and sell to the gullible.
Post Reply