ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post Reply
tommo100
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 377
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 15:59

ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by tommo100 »

how much trouble would bazookas`s spearing jab and clam like defense give floyd,id`e like to think it would be closer than most people imagine
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Not much at all, Ike was too one dimensional. Mayweather would take away the jab and do his pot shot routine.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46518
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by gilgamesh »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Not much at all, Ike was too one dimensional. Mayweather would take away the jab and do his pot shot routine.
Yep
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by dempseyfire »

Quartey is far better than anyone over 135 Floyd has beaten (factoring in the versions of Oscar and Mosley Floyd fought). Would be a very close fight.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

dempseyfire wrote:Quartey is far better than anyone over 135 Floyd has beaten (factoring in the versions of Oscar and Mosley Floyd fought). Would be a very close fight.
Pretty flimsy reasoning, Floyd has dominated everyone he has fought since 135 & Ike never beat anyone of his caliber either.
greynotsoold
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12
Joined: 11 Mar 2012, 13:22

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by greynotsoold »

The way Quartey threw his jab would cost him the fight. If you notice, he got a lot of pop on his jab by getting way up on his left foot. Mayweather would make him pay for that, make him miss that jab and counter him with punches that Quartey would essentially be leaning into.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4759
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by IKSRTFO »

In the aftermath of the Cotto fight, do you still think Quartey, a harder and better jabber than Cotto won't be able to trouble Floyd?
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4759
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by IKSRTFO »

tommo100 wrote:how much trouble would bazookas`s spearing jab and clam like defense give floyd,id`e like to think it would be closer than most people imagine

Even more closer now that we know Floyd is a sucker for power jabs. :OhYes:
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

It was a 35-year-old Mayweather at 154lbs...not as sharp by any means as the 2006-07 147lb version.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I think Cotto would beat Quartey.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think Cotto would beat Quartey.
Quartey would bash Cotto with the left, IMO.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think Cotto would beat Quartey.
Quartey would bash Cotto with the left, IMO.
Some of the time, the rest of it he would get out-worked. Good fight and it would be close. But certainly the mayweather fight had no bearing on what would happen with Floyd and Quartey. No one dimensional puncher is beating Floyd. It's like taking Rahman over Foreman because of Hasim's jab.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4759
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by IKSRTFO »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:It was a 35-year-old Mayweather at 154lbs...not as sharp by any means as the 2006-07 147lb version.
And the Quartey that made De La Hoya go life and death with him was past prime also and coming off a year and a half layoff.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I think Cotto would beat Quartey.
Quartey would bash Cotto with the left, IMO.
Some of the time, the rest of it he would get out-worked. Good fight and it would be close. But certainly the mayweather fight had no bearing on what would happen with Floyd and Quartey. No one dimensional puncher is beating Floyd. It's like taking Rahman over Foreman because of Hasim's jab.
Surely Foreman's jab gets the nod over Rahman's in the 90's. That fight was a whisker away from happening, incidentally.

Quartey simply wasnt on Mayweather's level.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Perhaps a poor analogy, I think Rahman had a better jab. But nothing along the lines of Floyd's superiority over Ike. Quartey is massively overrated these days. Real solid fighter, but he is the wise-guy "great" for a lot of people.
klompton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2738
Joined: 07 Jul 2003, 02:27

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by klompton »

Quartey would give Floyd all kinds of problems. He had a better jab than DLH (which is saying something) and an old faded DLH made Floyd look ordinary using just his jab. Those who are saying Cotto would beat Quartey are crazy as hell. Quartey would walk Cotto down, beat him up, and stop him late. What does Cotto do that a prime Quartey couldnt handle? Hell, I think even the rusty Quartey that fought DLH and Vargas, and maybe even the one who came back after years of a layoff would beat Cotto. All of these Floyd posts are ridiculous. The guy is another example, like Jones, of how good match making can make a fighter look. As much difficulty as Floyd had with a past his prime Cotto is there any wonder why he didnt face the guy at 140 or 147 years ago??? Same with Mosley and several others. Floyds people MIGHT let him fight Quartey NOW but they sure wouldnt have ever let a prime Floyd go up against any near prime version of Quartey. They would wait until Quartey started looking ordinary and maybe even then they wouldnt go near him with his jab. You think Floyd would have ever challenged Winky Wright at 154? Not likely.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

klompton wrote:Quartey would give Floyd all kinds of problems. He had a better jab than DLH (which is saying something) and an old faded DLH made Floyd look ordinary using just his jab. Those who are saying Cotto would beat Quartey are crazy as hell. Quartey would walk Cotto down, beat him up, and stop him late. What does Cotto do that a prime Quartey couldnt handle? Hell, I think even the rusty Quartey that fought DLH and Vargas, and maybe even the one who came back after years of a layoff would beat Cotto. All of these Floyd posts are ridiculous. The guy is another example, like Jones, of how good match making can make a fighter look. As much difficulty as Floyd had with a past his prime Cotto is there any wonder why he didnt face the guy at 140 or 147 years ago??? Same with Mosley and several others. Floyds people MIGHT let him fight Quartey NOW but they sure wouldnt have ever let a prime Floyd go up against any near prime version of Quartey. They would wait until Quartey started looking ordinary and maybe even then they wouldnt go near him with his jab. You think Floyd would have ever challenged Winky Wright at 154? Not likely.
:lol:

Oscar made Floyd look ordinary? Stick to history without film, your eyes don't work.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

klompton wrote:Quartey would give Floyd all kinds of problems. He had a better jab than DLH (which is saying something) and an old faded DLH made Floyd look ordinary using just his jab. Those who are saying Cotto would beat Quartey are crazy as hell. Quartey would walk Cotto down, beat him up, and stop him late. What does Cotto do that a prime Quartey couldnt handle? Hell, I think even the rusty Quartey that fought DLH and Vargas, and maybe even the one who came back after years of a layoff would beat Cotto. All of these Floyd posts are ridiculous. The guy is another example, like Jones, of how good match making can make a fighter look. As much difficulty as Floyd had with a past his prime Cotto is there any wonder why he didnt face the guy at 140 or 147 years ago??? Same with Mosley and several others. Floyds people MIGHT let him fight Quartey NOW but they sure wouldnt have ever let a prime Floyd go up against any near prime version of Quartey. They would wait until Quartey started looking ordinary and maybe even then they wouldnt go near him with his jab. You think Floyd would have ever challenged Winky Wright at 154? Not likely.
I dont agree with your proposed outcome, but its hard to disagree with this much.

Mayweather would not have risked the, '0' against Quartey, or younger incarnations of De La Hoya and Mosley, either.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Floyd would have loved the payday of DLH early in his career. You have to be rich to protect being rich. But if you mean, Floyd the star, at a point he wasn't a star, that is 100% correct.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Im quite sure he'd love the Pacquiao payday, too. The work for the pay, on the other hand, has kept him putting up as many roadblocks as Arum ever could.

The early part of his career, I remember very distinctly. I was in my late teens when he was coming to prominence, and I vividly recall him being a vastly different guy --- one I was in fact a fan of.

By the time he had reached 147, however, had there been peak versions of De La Hoya and Mosley alongside him, well...I have little doubt he'd have stayed at 140. Those guys at their (147) best would be roughly 50-50 bets with the WW Mayweather, and that assuredly means he'd never get in the ring with either of them.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by dempseyfire »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Floyd would have loved the payday of DLH early in his career. You have to be rich to protect being rich. But if you mean, Floyd the star, at a point he wasn't a star, that is 100% correct.
Floyd would have 'loved' the idea of fighting Oscar like Jones Jr 'loved' the idea of fighting Buster Douglas in 1997 or Corrie Sanders in 2003 . . it ultimately wouldn't have happened.

The Oscar-Floyd fight was very close . . Oscar won at least 5 rounds and a draw wouldn' have been a terrible decision. Those who had Floyd dominating seemingly think playing defense and having better Compubox percentages should automatically win a round . . in that case Chris Byrd dominated Oquendo, Golota, and Vitali Klitschko . . .
The Oscar who fought Mosley the first time would've definitely beaten any 147 lb version of Floyd.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by Ezzard »

The BBC had it a draw.

I thought Floyd won a close decision. BUT, as ever, I got the feeling that Floyd could have stepped it up and been more convincing. Because he never does it...it remains a feeling...
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Im quite sure he'd love the Pacquiao payday, too. The work for the pay, on the other hand, has kept him putting up as many roadblocks as Arum ever could.

The early part of his career, I remember very distinctly. I was in my late teens when he was coming to prominence, and I vividly recall him being a vastly different guy --- one I was in fact a fan of.

By the time he had reached 147, however, had there been peak versions of De La Hoya and Mosley alongside him, well...I have little doubt he'd have stayed at 140. Those guys at their (147) best would be roughly 50-50 bets with the WW Mayweather, and that assuredly means he'd never get in the ring with either of them.
He would have fought Oscar at any point in his career, that's what made him "Money". But if your premise is that he reached that status without having to fight Oscar, fair point.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

dempseyfire wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Floyd would have loved the payday of DLH early in his career. You have to be rich to protect being rich. But if you mean, Floyd the star, at a point he wasn't a star, that is 100% correct.
Floyd would have 'loved' the idea of fighting Oscar like Jones Jr 'loved' the idea of fighting Buster Douglas in 1997 or Corrie Sanders in 2003 . . it ultimately wouldn't have happened.

The Oscar-Floyd fight was very close . . Oscar won at least 5 rounds and a draw wouldn' have been a terrible decision. Those who had Floyd dominating seemingly think playing defense and having better Compubox percentages should automatically win a round . . in that case Chris Byrd dominated Oquendo, Golota, and Vitali Klitschko . . .
The Oscar who fought Mosley the first time would've definitely beaten any 147 lb version of Floyd.
Awww, somebody disagrees with you so they can't score fights without compubox? You're adorable, that fight wasn't close. Oscar was a massive payday, Floyd would have jumped at it and I think his ring IQ is probably too high for any version of Oscar.
Vladimir5555
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1221
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 11:38

Re: ike quartey vs floyd mayweather

Post by Vladimir5555 »

Floyd by SD.
Post Reply