BRUCE BAKER: Good or Bad for British Boxing.....

Post Reply

Bruce Baker: overall doing "good" or "bad" for British Boxing?

Good: he's challenging the establishment - good on him.
4
19%
Bad: Masters Titles, International Masters titles, and now the Luxembourg thing..... he needs to be kept in check!
15
71%
I can see both sides: he's neither good nor bad
2
10%
 
Total votes: 21

T.M.K
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 679
Joined: 15 Feb 2006, 18:28

BRUCE BAKER: Good or Bad for British Boxing.....

Post by T.M.K »

Hi all,

Bruce Baker - I just cannot make my mind up whether I am against him or feel he is doing a good job - very fine line. I certainly admire his business acumen and his ingenuity, but I am just not sure I like what he's doing.

Your thoughts or comments?


Col/"T.M.K"
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: BRUCE BAKER: Good or Bad for British Boxing.....

Post by jonny »

he's not my cup of tea I'm afraid.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: BRUCE BAKER: Good or Bad for British Boxing.....

Post by Adamj1987 »

not for me i'm afraid, i think he would make it like the WBC and WBA and it would all become farcical
fozzy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 40
Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 17:49

Re: BRUCE BAKER: Good or Bad for British Boxing.....

Post by fozzy »

:TU: :TU:
jonny wrote:he's not my cup of tea I'm afraid.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: BRUCE BAKER: Good or Bad for British Boxing.....

Post by Coco »

I think he is being used as a patsy here, i'm sure he will get his pieces of silver but he is not the driving force
Post Reply