Cockneygymrat
Cockneygymrat
You joined on 21st May 2012 and have come on all guns blazing , you are cleary either a banned member who rejoined under another username or an established member using an alias. If you clearly have so much to say then say it as "you"
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Cockneygymrat
Are you trying to smoke him out with this dedicated thread?
Re: Cockneygymrat
Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
-
damianhucker1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36
Re: Cockneygymrat
Could just as easily be someone who has moved from ESB .taffytoon wrote:You joined on 21st May 2012 and have come on all guns blazing , you are cleary either a banned member who rejoined under another username or an established member using an alias. If you clearly have so much to say then say it as "you"
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Cockneygymrat
The clue's in the name Cockney .... Gym ....... Rat !!!!
Re: Cockneygymrat
Yes, clearly he wouldHorse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Re: Cockneygymrat
I disagree.Deserter wrote:Yes, clearly he would
Re: Cockneygymrat
I was being sarcastic in response to your inane question.Horse wrote:I disagree.Deserter wrote:Yes, clearly he would
Re: Cockneygymrat
i belive it was sarcasmHorse wrote:I disagree.Deserter wrote:Yes, clearly he would
Re: Cockneygymrat
Adamj1987 wrote:i belive it was sarcasmHorse wrote:I disagree.Deserter wrote:Yes, clearly he would
Re: Cockneygymrat
My question was rhetorical. Didn't you understand that?Deserter wrote:I was being sarcastic in response to your inane question.
Re: Cockneygymrat
I did. It doesn't change my point.Horse wrote:My question was rhetorical. Didn't you understand that?Deserter wrote:I was being sarcastic in response to your inane question.
Re: Cockneygymrat
ironicDeserter wrote:I did. It doesn't change my point.Horse wrote:My question was rhetorical. Didn't you understand that?Deserter wrote:I was being sarcastic in response to your inane question.
Re: Cockneygymrat
I don't understand.Palimpsest wrote:Have you heard Horse?
Re: Cockneygymrat
I can't be bothered with you and your inane nonsense.Deserter wrote:I did. It doesn't change my point.
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Cockneygymrat
Horse wrote:I can't be bothered with you and your inane nonsense.Deserter wrote:I did. It doesn't change my point.

Re: Cockneygymrat
Sometimes Horse reminds me of an online version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. Respect, man! ![[icon_notworthy.gif] :bow:](./images/smilies/icon_notworthy.gif)
Re: Cockneygymrat
You are new so I don't know much about you, are you a troll?Palimpsest wrote:
Re: Cockneygymrat
What is this all about then......
Re: Cockneygymrat
I am not sure how to respond to that.Deno1986 wrote:Sometimes Horse reminds me of an online version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. Respect, man!
Re: Cockneygymrat
With a question?Horse wrote:I am not sure how to respond to that.Deno1986 wrote:Sometimes Horse reminds me of an online version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. Respect, man!
Re: Cockneygymrat
Don't fret, mate. Take it as a compliment.Horse wrote:I am not sure how to respond to that.Deno1986 wrote:Sometimes Horse reminds me of an online version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. Respect, man!
Re: Cockneygymrat
Horse?kevo wrote:With a question?Horse wrote:I am not sure how to respond to that.Deno1986 wrote:Sometimes Horse reminds me of an online version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. Respect, man!
Re: Cockneygymrat
I could have, possibly a rhetorical one.kevo wrote:With a question?