I will then, thanks.Deno1986 wrote:Don't fret, mate. Take it as a compliment.
Cockneygymrat
Re: Cockneygymrat
Re: Cockneygymrat
I like Cockneygymrat, he's ok in my books and you need your head examining making a thread about him.
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Cockneygymrat
states wrote:Horse?kevo wrote:With a question?Horse wrote:I am not sure how to respond to that.
Re: Cockneygymrat
From what I've seen, he's been a good poster. Not saying I agree with him, but he's put his points across in a reasonable manner (again from what I've seen). If he's replaced an old alias... so what?
If you don't agree with him, take him on.
If you don't agree with him, take him on.
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Cockneygymrat
Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'Horse wrote:You are new so I don't know much about you, are you a troll?Palimpsest wrote:

Last edited by Palimpsest on 24 May 2012, 19:08, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Cockneygymrat
Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Cockneygymrat
This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outsetHorse wrote:Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
Re: Cockneygymrat
I don't believe that is the case.Palimpsest wrote:This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outset
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Cockneygymrat
Good night 'Horse'Horse wrote:I don't believe that is the case.Palimpsest wrote:This from 'Horse' who has gone out his way to be argumentative from the outset
Re: Cockneygymrat
Petty, petty, petty.states wrote:I disagree.
Re: Cockneygymrat
I like the way Horse does it, always have. Asks very blunt questions and gives nothing away. It's like here's a platform... go talk stupid 
Re: Cockneygymrat
Grow up, Palimpsest, you time wasting troll.Palimpsest wrote:Good night 'Horse'
Re: Cockneygymrat
JDC wrote:I like the way Horse does it, always have. Asks very blunt questions and gives nothing away. It's like here's a platform... go talk stupid
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Cockneygymrat
I've been rebuked ....... by 'Horse'Horse wrote:Grow up, Palimpsest, you time wasting troll.Palimpsest wrote:Good night 'Horse'
Re: Cockneygymrat
But Looking at all threads, he isn't.Horse wrote:Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
The poster in question is on my radar.
Bat signal was sent up yesterday.
Re: Cockneygymrat
That was a funny 2 minutes reading the entire thread. It's like something out of faulty towers. 
Re: Cockneygymrat
Adamj1987 wrote:ironicDeserter wrote:I did. It doesn't change my point.Horse wrote:My question was rhetorical. Didn't you understand that?
Re: Cockneygymrat
kevo wrote:With a question?Horse wrote:I am not sure how to respond to that.Deno1986 wrote:Sometimes Horse reminds me of an online version of Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory. Respect, man!
Re: Cockneygymrat
Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Cockneygymrat
Oh dearPoncey wrote:But Looking at all threads, he isn't.Horse wrote:Have a look at your posts in this thread, they are far more trollish than anyone else's.Palimpsest wrote:Judging by your posts in this thread you're hardly in a position to accuse anyone of being a 'troll'
The poster in question is on my radar.
Bat signal was sent up yesterday.
-
Yes We Can
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16
Re: Cockneygymrat
Who cares either way?taffytoon wrote:Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Alias on internet forum shocker?!?!
Re: Cockneygymrat
Suppose you're right funtimefuntime wrote:Who cares either way?taffytoon wrote:Who says I do not agree with him? I think a lot of what he says makes sence, I would just like to know who he really is as in my opinion he is an established member. He has shown some very valid opinions to be honest.Horse wrote:Would you make this thread if you agreed with him?
Alias on internet forum shocker?!?!