The north is always where it's at.split_decision wrote:Yes, now there's a big fight that can be made easily and a chance for Clinton to gain retribution.hitman_hatton1 wrote:
excellent win for clinton. glen johnson has an ibf eliminator coming up, so hopefully he'll be next.
Sheffield is where it's at right now. Manchester is sooooo June 2005..
I'm buzzing about tonight.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
There was very little to seperate Woods vs Johnson over 24 rounds (I actually thought Johnson won the first fight bigger), There was very little to seperate Tarver vs Johnson over 24 rounds (rematch was close aswell).hitman_hatton1 wrote:i wouldn't tip him to beat antonio tarver. tarver has better skills and is a hard puncher.stujones wrote:on this form I would favour him over Tarver and Johnson.
I think I would even favour him over Calzaghe now.
![]()
he's capable of beating johnson if he fights like that though.i still think calzaghe on his speed would be the deciding factor if those 2 met.
Woods appears to be a much better fighter than the one who lost to Johnson and I don't think Tarver can be alot better than the one who lost the rematch. Tarver doesn't work for 3 minutes in every round - his lack of workrate for me cost him vs Johnson and Jones the first time around. Woods I think will outwork Tarver and I think will take advantage of clearing defensive weakness in Tarver.
It will be the hardest fight for Woods, but I think Woods on points.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
i think u only have to look at rd 5 of woods-gonzalez tonight to c why tarver beats him. gonzalez got on his toes and brought woods to him and easily won the rd.
tarver fights like that and has much better skills than what gonzalez does. u couldn't fault tarver's workrate in the 2nd johnson fight and i thought he was robbed in the 1st johnson fight.
tarver is top dog until someone proves otherwise and for me that someone is not woods.
tarver fights like that and has much better skills than what gonzalez does. u couldn't fault tarver's workrate in the 2nd johnson fight and i thought he was robbed in the 1st johnson fight.
tarver is top dog until someone proves otherwise and for me that someone is not woods.
-
pugilisticprofessor
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 208
- Joined: 19 Nov 2003, 02:02
He wouldn't start favourite but I wouldnt completely write off his chances, Tarver has the worst workrate of a 'top' fighter I have ever seen.hitman_hatton1 wrote:i wouldn't tip him to beat antonio tarver. tarver has better skills and is a hard puncher.stujones wrote:on this form I would favour him over Tarver and Johnson.
I think I would even favour him over Calzaghe now.
![]()
he's capable of beating johnson if he fights like that though.i still think calzaghe on his speed would be the deciding factor if those 2 met.