BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
So basically you go before your Area Council and then have your licence removed??? I would bring this up in the forthcoming seminar but i'll be fooked if i'm paying 50 quid for the pleasure.dondada wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/bbboc- ... -v-chisora
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
The Insider wrote:So basically you go before your Area Council and then have your licence removed??? I would bring this up in the forthcoming seminar but i'll be fooked if i'm paying 50 quid for the pleasure.dondada wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/bbboc- ... -v-chisora
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
Yes. I love the suggestions that it's "an embarrassing climb down". This is worse! Pay your travel, turn up, get told off, licence taken off you, go homeThe Insider wrote:So basically you go before your Area Council and then have your licence removed?dondada wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/bbboc- ... -v-chisora
(Potentially...I'm sure all concerned will, of course, get a fair hearing.)
Must have been done after further expensive consultation with m'learned friends.
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
The 50 pound charge has been removed its now first come first served for the seminar
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
when was this waved Jon? I only had the letter this week?jonp wrote:The 50 pound charge has been removed its now first come first served for the seminar
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
Just after the letter.Its first come first served bout 80 places i think
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
Nice of em to tell everyone. I Saw 50 quid charge and I "filed" the letter in the bin.jonp wrote:Just after the letter.Its first come first served bout 80 places i think
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
Got the letter this morning about the £50 charge being waved along with the new Board statement regarding Haye v Chisora.jonp wrote:The 50 pound charge has been removed its now first come first served for the seminar
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
Just ring me when yr a few days behind ill keep you up to scratch lol
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
Got your number Peggy :)jonp wrote:Just ring me when yr a few days behind ill keep you up to scratch lol
-
The Insider
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
It can be interpreted either way I suppose. If the Boards latest statement was meant to clarify things its certainly hasn't. Perhaps it could be bought up at the seminar or agm.MachoMan09 wrote:I took a different message from the Board's statement than Ian, I think it is a U-turn and I'd now be surprised if any of those people involved in the Upton Park promotion have their licences revoked.
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
You could be right. I see it as more covering themselves re future potential action. They have to follow procedure.MachoMan09 wrote:I took a different message from the Board's statement than Ian, I think it is a U-turn and I'd now be surprised if any of those people involved in the Upton Park promotion have their licences revoked.
-
cockneygymrat
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 64
- Joined: 21 May 2012, 06:47
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
It is yet another move by the BBBofC to put a block on people turning up to the meeting so everything they want voted through can be done so as they are reliant on licence holders not turning up due to the £50 levy.The Insider wrote:So basically you go before your Area Council and then have your licence removed??? I would bring this up in the forthcoming seminar but i'll be fooked if i'm paying 50 quid for the pleasure.dondada wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/bbboc- ... -v-chisora
The meeting in Birmingham or wherever runs from 0930 until about 4 in the afternoon so why the £50 charge.
It is yet another disgusting attempt to keep the BBBofC as a closed shop. The old farts who refuse to change with the times and are so outdated with their decisions and how boxing in this country is run.
Re: BBBoC clarifies its stance on licencees involved in H v C
The 50 quid was for the drugs nutrition and medical seminar that was going on not for the actual AGm