Buglioni

Vano-irons
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 18
Joined: 28 Dec 2011, 16:35

Re: Buglioni

Post by Vano-irons »

Bryn wrote:
Vano-irons wrote: I've also heard that BJS absolutely battered Mendy in sparring. Like, totally fucked him up
Interesting. When was this mate?

BJS is one of my favourite domestic fighters, I'm certain we will see him challenge and win an alphabet title in the next few years.
This was at the beginning of the month apparently (I wasn't there, but heard from someone at the TKO).

I really like Billy Joe as well. Massively exciting prospect with power and pretty good boxing skills. Warren needs to move him along a bit quicker tho
Superheavy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 333
Joined: 20 Feb 2011, 07:24

Re: Buglioni

Post by Superheavy »

Vano-irons wrote:He has pretty much blown everyone away at this level so far, so the Latvians and TTGs won't tell us too much.
TTGs :lol:
DannyNaz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 45
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 14:25

Re: Buglioni

Post by DannyNaz »

What did I say about noble??? No wonder they didn't put frank in with him!!!


Wish I could find somewhere to put a wager on these undercard fights! I knew noble could win this.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Buglioni

Post by smoggy7188 »

Dignum looks tiny.
DannyNaz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 45
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 14:25

Re: Buglioni

Post by DannyNaz »

Probably a day before weigh in as well smoggy!

Noble is a lot better than his record when in the mood though.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Buglioni

Post by smoggy7188 »

smith looks tiny too, i fancy ancliff here.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Buglioni

Post by smoggy7188 »

Ancliff really is slipping, needs to think bout packing in cos he takes a alot of shots. i remember seeing him in with joe murray and he was really good.
DannyNaz
Cruiserweight
Posts: 45
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 14:25

Re: Buglioni

Post by DannyNaz »

I really think he hasn't got the desire anymore and is there for a decent pay day.
Hasn't looked great in his last few.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Buglioni

Post by Old bones Ian »

I'm a fan of Buglioni, but his footwork isn't good tonight. His feet are squarein up his body in there
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Buglioni

Post by The Insider »

Watching him now and he's far to easy to hit. Soon as he faces a live opponent or banger he could be in trouble. I agree with the commentators that he doesn't get his hands back quick enough.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Buglioni

Post by smoggy7188 »

If he didnt have all the fans there wudnt be such a fuss about him.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Buglioni

Post by Old bones Ian »

He's doing ok tonight, but he needs a fight away from home IMO.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Buglioni

Post by smoggy7188 »

Agree with that but they will milk the fans as much as they can by keeping him in london.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Buglioni

Post by Old bones Ian »

He looked bored in there tonight. I'm guessing he gets good sparring, but i think he needs to work on his footwork, get himself in and out better. He's not going to walk everyone down, and thats all he's doing at the moment with the quality of opponents. He needs to get in with champions sparring.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Buglioni

Post by smoggy7188 »

He looks vulnerable at the moment. i like buncey but i wish he would get off buglionis cock.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Buglioni

Post by The Insider »

Not impressed on that performance. Hes a work in progress and its early days so he may yet prove me wrong.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Buglioni

Post by milpool »

First time I've seen Buglioni, wasn't massively impressed. He shipped a lot of silly punches but to his credit he showed a lot of concentration and just got on with the job.
He's still learning but they need to bring him on slowly.
markfightoptions
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 04 Dec 2011, 09:51

Re: Buglioni

Post by markfightoptions »

Again im totally unimpressed by this kid, i would definitely like to see his opponent fight again soon - hard as nails.
iftkwoody
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 03:10

Re: Buglioni

Post by iftkwoody »

yid14 wrote:
iftkwoody wrote:He looks pretty good think he'll have to be taken slow tho as he has a lot of faults.
When you out again Dan?
Probably september mate there is talks of a title fight. Masters I think
iftkwoody
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 27 Jul 2010, 03:10

Re: Buglioni

Post by iftkwoody »

I fought meikle and dont underestimate him he is a very tough slippery fighter he is also an absolutely top bloke but thats for another thread. To be honest I think i didn't see anything from buglioni I wasn't expecting. He looks the part and has a good level of skill just got a young head on his shoulders I have been told that he is the "next bog thing" and i wish him all the best in being that but he has a lot to learn first. All the stuff about his crown being too much and putting him off shouldn't be a factor because that is a key part of Boxing if your good your not just a good boxer your good at handling pressure and loads of other things. I always say a good boxer doesn't always make a good boxer theres so much more than skill to be counted for.

Anyway frank looks like a decent from fighter and by his interviews a top bloke and I look forward to seeing him progress
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Buglioni

Post by crusader »

Buglioni was hit too much, especially during the first three rounds.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Buglioni

Post by crusader »

BTW---Am I correct in thinking that the score was 60-55?

BoxRec lists it as 60-54
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Buglioni

Post by safeerah »

Greavesy wrote:This week Buglioni fights again

Only Jody Miekle

so shouldnt be much trouble


But how far can he go ?

First time i saw him i was impressed

but then when i saw him again i wasnt too impress at all .
I think he is a accident waiting to happen, no defense at all, upright with his head up like a beacon and loads up too much, shame really great support, unfortunately when he goes up in level he will be found out, if not before.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Buglioni

Post by palooka »

It's too early to tell; he was a very good amateur without being the best at his weight. He has a good frame and looks strong. He'll need to be moved steady and can't imagine he'll face a hitter for a few years yet. He has a great following and I imagine he'll be in some decent scraps and earn a few quid.
Post Reply