cockneygymrat wrote:Hardly exciting news a journeyman signing up with a promoter is it?
How is he a journeyman then? Get some respect, have u fought at a high level yourself?
And the post was informing people about him signing, if it doesn't interest u why bother posting?
If hes who im guessing
then he couldnt fight his way out of a wet paper bag
MachoMan09 wrote:I think the term journeyman should shake the negative connotation it has developed in boxing circles. In any other trade it denotes a person who is experienced and competent but unexceptional. I don't see what's wrong with that.
I still do not see what the controversy is. I agree with your post and also stand by my comment. People need to get a life.
MachoMan09 wrote:I think the term journeyman should shake the negative connotation it has developed in boxing circles. In any other trade it denotes a person who is experienced and competent but unexceptional. I don't see what's wrong with that.
I still do not see what the controversy is. I agree with your post and also stand by my comment. People need to get a life.
How can a man who comes on here, slag people off anonymously tell others to get a life?
My life as well as many others on here no doubt, is fine and dandy thanks very much.
MachoMan09 wrote:I think the term journeyman should shake the negative connotation it has developed in boxing circles. In any other trade it denotes a person who is experienced and competent but unexceptional. I don't see what's wrong with that.
I still do not see what the controversy is. I agree with your post and also stand by my comment. People need to get a life.
Curtis has just told me who you are.
Very disappointed.
MachoMan09 wrote:I think the term journeyman should shake the negative connotation it has developed in boxing circles. In any other trade it denotes a person who is experienced and competent but unexceptional. I don't see what's wrong with that.
I still do not see what the controversy is. I agree with your post and also stand by my comment. People need to get a life.
Read the above quote. I repeat where is the controversy,
Last edited by cockneygymrat on 02 Jun 2012, 12:36, edited 1 time in total.
Curtis; you're in an eliminator next up for a British Title shot. In my eyes that is a contender. If gymrat does ask for a job I wouldn't stand in his way or balls things up for him; 2 wrongs don't make a right and he may learn more than he already does; (on another point, I thought Bomber had left as well? Am sure I read something along those lines this last week.)
curtis wood wrote:delighted to have signed with dave, im really excited about the future, got a big job next week but if i can come through that 1 there are some great options out there for me, when my granny who is 87 was having periods more often than fwank was getting me fights i knew it was time to move on and dave is very ambitious and thats what i want to be a part of
Ha ha quality mate hope ya feelin good mate can't wait for next week that's how we roll dog lol ps great move curt onwards and upwards kidda
MachoMan09 wrote:I think the term journeyman should shake the negative connotation it has developed in boxing circles. In any other trade it denotes a person who is experienced and competent but unexceptional. I don't see what's wrong with that.
I still do not see what the controversy is. I agree with your post and also stand by my comment. People need to get a life.
Read the above quote. I repeat where is the controversy,
If it's Spud he should be ashamed of himself - Curtis Woodhouse's story is like something out of Roy of the Rovers - and it still seems like there's much more to come.
Thanks pal, still lots more to come from me, still learning, the story isn't over yet, if anything its just getting started, and one mention of the elephant man and up pops spuds name! He's ugly but not that ugly!
curtis wood wrote:Thanks pal, still lots more to come from me, still learning, the story isn't over yet, if anything its just getting started, and one mention of the elephant man and up pops spuds name! He's ugly but not that ugly!
curtis wood wrote:cokney is nothing at all to do with fwank, hes a fat lump from up north who looks like the elephant man, thats your 1st and last clue
Genuinely surprised and disappointed if it is him. The one thing I'd say is that historically he had a very distinctive way of writing and Cockney Gym Rat doesn't follow the same style. Hope it isn't Spud..
Genuinely surprised and disappointed if it is him. The one thing I'd say is that historically he had a very distinctive way of writing and Cockney Gym Rat doesn't follow the same style. Hope it isn't Spud..
My thoughts exactly. Would hope that spuds better than that.
Curtis is clearly one of the games good guys. Cockneygymrat is clearly a bell end.