haye chisora undercard

Post Reply
biglefthook
Cruiserweight
Posts: 245
Joined: 01 Oct 2010, 13:06

haye chisora undercard

Post by biglefthook »

has anyone got any details or a link with undercard detail on
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by smoggy7188 »

was supposed to be announced tuesday just gone but has been moved to this wednesday.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by Finn »

smoggy7188 wrote:was supposed to be announced tuesday just gone but has been moved to this wednesday.
Theres lots of rumours and some decent fights being kicked up - groves v anderson etc i think with the BBBofC situation people are holding off committing at the moment so dont be suprised the announcement kepts getting posponed..
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by smoggy7188 »

Gavin/Heffron has always been mentioned. I can see there being alot of foreign fighters on the undercard. As Buglioni said he cant risk a fight on it incase it means he cant fight for British belt.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by Finn »

smoggy7188 wrote:Gavin/Heffron has always been mentioned. I can see there being alot of foreign fighters on the undercard. As Buglioni said he cant risk a fight on it incase it means he cant fight for British belt.
I think your right but I think some of the bigger names know that if they still fight the BBBofC wont risk snubbing them - is BJS fighting?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by leforge »

kingfinn wrote:
smoggy7188 wrote:was supposed to be announced tuesday just gone but has been moved to this wednesday.
Theres lots of rumours and some decent fights being kicked up - groves v anderson etc i think with the BBBofC situation people are holding off committing at the moment so dont be suprised the announcement kepts getting posponed..
I doubt that fight will happen. It should be put back to purse bids the promotor failed to get the bill on 30 June in time.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23140
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by mickey1975 »

leforge wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
smoggy7188 wrote:was supposed to be announced tuesday just gone but has been moved to this wednesday.
Theres lots of rumours and some decent fights being kicked up - groves v anderson etc i think with the BBBofC situation people are holding off committing at the moment so dont be suprised the announcement kepts getting posponed..
I doubt that fight will happen. It should be put back to purse bids the promotor failed to get the bill on 30 June in time.
If it does not happen, why? Both can sell tickets and the first fight was good. Why arent they fighting?
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by leforge »

[qu
Theres lots of rumours and some decent fights being kicked up - groves v anderson etc i think with the BBBofC situation people are holding off committing at the moment so dont be suprised the announcement kepts getting posponed..[/quote]
I doubt that fight will happen. It should be put back to purse bids the promotor failed to get the bill on 30 June in time.[/quote]
If it does not happen, why? Both can sell tickets and the first fight was good. Why arent they fighting?[/quote]
It down to the promotor. Mick Hennessy last year when he first won CHisora v Fury purse bids did not have a venue and it went back to purse bids(Board would not allow MArbella) so why is this not happening again.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by Finn »

leforge wrote:
Theres lots of rumours and some decent fights being kicked up - groves v anderson etc i think with the BBBofC situation people are holding off committing at the moment so dont be suprised the announcement kepts getting posponed..
I doubt that fight will happen. It should be put back to purse bids the promotor failed to get the bill on 30 June in time.
If it does not happen, why? Both can sell tickets and the first fight was good. Why arent they fighting?
It down to the promotor. Mick Hennessy last year when he first won CHisora v Fury purse bids did not have a venue and it went back to purse bids(Board would not allow MArbella) so why is this not happening again.
I think they were wrong not to allow marbella.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by leforge »

kingfinn wrote:
leforge wrote:
Theres lots of rumours and some decent fights being kicked up - groves v anderson etc i think with the BBBofC situation people are holding off committing at the moment so dont be suprised the announcement kepts getting posponed..
I doubt that fight will happen. It should be put back to purse bids the promotor failed to get the bill on 30 June in time.
If it does not happen, why? Both can sell tickets and the first fight was good. Why arent they fighting?
It down to the promotor. Mick Hennessy last year when he first won CHisora v Fury purse bids did not have a venue and it went back to purse bids(Board would not allow MArbella) so why is this not happening again.
I think they were wrong not to allow marbella.
Indeed. But they need to put this one to purse bids. I doubt a british title be allowed on this bill.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by Finn »

Indeed. But they need to put this one to purse bids. I doubt a british title be allowed on this bill.
ive got a sneaky suspicion you could be right.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by stujones »

If the bill goes ahead I don't expect a cram packed undercard - it has sold 30 K + tickets without a mention of a undercard (notewithstanding Povetkin vs Rahman). It don't need an undercard.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by Finn »

stujones wrote:If the bill goes ahead I don't expect a cram packed undercard - it has sold 30 K + tickets without a mention of a undercard (notewithstanding Povetkin vs Rahman). It don't need an undercard.
true i just think FW may try and make a point also its a big chance for him to rope in a lot of new subscribers
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by earsjohn »

kingfinn wrote:
stujones wrote:If the bill goes ahead I don't expect a cram packed undercard - it has sold 30 K + tickets without a mention of a undercard (notewithstanding Povetkin vs Rahman). It don't need an undercard.
true i just think FW may try and make a point also its a big chance for him to rope in a lot of new subscribers
What point would he be making?

The more stacked the undercard, the more that has to be paid out. This fight makes its money on its own so I fully expect a klitschko-esque undercard. Can't really see a whole load of subscribers climbing on board for Gavin v Heffron or Saunders v TBA, so probably not worth the extra cost.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by leforge »

earsjohn wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
stujones wrote:If the bill goes ahead I don't expect a cram packed undercard - it has sold 30 K + tickets without a mention of a undercard (notewithstanding Povetkin vs Rahman). It don't need an undercard.
true i just think FW may try and make a point also its a big chance for him to rope in a lot of new subscribers
What point would he be making?

The more stacked the undercard, the more that has to be paid out. This fight makes its money on its own so I fully expect a klitschko-esque undercard. Can't really see a whole load of subscribers climbing on board for Gavin v Heffron or Saunders v TBA, so probably not worth the extra cost.
They going to have spend a lot on advertising to get around 300k subcribers they not got sky plugging it constantly.

I expect the undercard to be awful no need for good one
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by Finn »

earsjohn wrote:
kingfinn wrote:
stujones wrote:If the bill goes ahead I don't expect a cram packed undercard - it has sold 30 K + tickets without a mention of a undercard (notewithstanding Povetkin vs Rahman). It don't need an undercard.
true i just think FW may try and make a point also its a big chance for him to rope in a lot of new subscribers
What point would he be making?

The more stacked the undercard, the more that has to be paid out. This fight makes its money on its own so I fully expect a klitschko-esque undercard. Can't really see a whole load of subscribers climbing on board for Gavin v Heffron or Saunders v TBA, so probably not worth the extra cost.
It wouldnt suprise me but he needs to keep the people who subscribe for this event from cancelling straight after, the best way would be to impress the viewer. It would also be a chance to get increased exposure for fighters like gavin, groves and saunders which will pay off further down the line when he will rely on them for viewing figures possibly as headliners.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: haye chisora undercard

Post by dondada »

MachoMan09 wrote:A four man battle royal featuring I'm The King of the Gypsies vs No I'm the King of the Gypsies vs No He's The King of The Gypsies vs Who The eff is The King of the Gypsies has also been touted, if they can persuade a "celebrity tinker" to play the man in the middle & Danny Dyer to be MC. The winner will immediately take on the winner of a four rounder between the ghost of Lenny McClean & the ghost of Paul Sykes. The winner of that fight will then fight Bruce Lee who didn't really die in 1973 but in fact entered a monastery in deepest, darkest China where he has been undertaking a state sponsored training programme readying him for this very day (the death of his son was organised by the Chinese government to prepare him for the prospect of seeing a man physically shooting people and coping with it unflinchingly). Assuming all this goes off without a hitch e.g. Danny Dyer tossing himself off into Roy Shaw's pocket causing Roy to go "off on one", the scene will be set for Winner vs Mark Potter for a shot at the disputed world heavyweight championship currently held by a bloke who is harder than Dominic Negus but not as hard as Dominic Negus could have been.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :salut:
Post Reply