Pacman Bradley spoiler
Pacman Bradley spoiler
Wrong man won but now mayweather v Bradley can be made with ease !
Pacman lost about two rounds, 3 rounds even, I made it 118-112.
Pacman lost about two rounds, 3 rounds even, I made it 118-112.
-
lefthook82
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
What a fcking shame the fight wont be made now. The one we had all been waiting for. Everyone is too blame but I think Arum is the main villain.
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Strange decision. Cant understand how Pacquiao lost but he was flat and gave away the last 3 rounds and lost the first (although that was close).
But thats boxing, we move on to the next fight.
But thats boxing, we move on to the next fight.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Nothing surprises me anymore, buncey hit the nail on the head, legal court cases now, £m's down the drain !
-
wesley05
- Heavyweight

Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
This is wants shit about boxing pacman won 8 rounds Bradley 3 and 1 even ![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
i had it 8-4 pacman.
bit of karma from last time u could argue.
so many guff decisions in boxing just lately.
never known it so bad.
bit of karma from last time u could argue.
so many guff decisions in boxing just lately.
never known it so bad.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
I had it 116-112 for Manny
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
I can honestly say my interest in the sport is waning massively lately, after watching abril v rios and now this i find it hard to enjoy a sport that is so corrupt, arum should be investigated.
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Disgraceful decision.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Could not give Bradley more than 4 rounds, I just cannot believe that decision, some fights are close and you could argue either way but there really was only one man
who won that fight, there is no way you can find 7 rounds for Bradley.
It seems clear to me that there is no one out there other than Mayweather to fight Pacquaio, the public has had enough of these other challengers to Pac, so what they
have done is invent something, they now have a rematch of a bad result, they will jack up the shit between now and November and it will sell as your average boxing fan
will want to see justice done. Arum will convince Pac to get a little bit angry in a few days and that will keep it in the public domain and just keep building it, sell out arena again, more tv countries
than ever take the fight to see if the "champ" can come back and claim his crowns.
Just beginning to run out of steam for my sport now, no real allegiances to either man but getting sick and tired of bullshit constantly, arguments, inside politics, bad judging, early stoppages, blatent favouritism, boxers being stopped fighting by promoters etc.
Its been a passion of mine for 40 years, I need something to keep me in guys, because right now, I'm watching fights where the winner is known before the final bell providing both men stand up.
who won that fight, there is no way you can find 7 rounds for Bradley.
It seems clear to me that there is no one out there other than Mayweather to fight Pacquaio, the public has had enough of these other challengers to Pac, so what they
have done is invent something, they now have a rematch of a bad result, they will jack up the shit between now and November and it will sell as your average boxing fan
will want to see justice done. Arum will convince Pac to get a little bit angry in a few days and that will keep it in the public domain and just keep building it, sell out arena again, more tv countries
than ever take the fight to see if the "champ" can come back and claim his crowns.
Just beginning to run out of steam for my sport now, no real allegiances to either man but getting sick and tired of bullshit constantly, arguments, inside politics, bad judging, early stoppages, blatent favouritism, boxers being stopped fighting by promoters etc.
Its been a passion of mine for 40 years, I need something to keep me in guys, because right now, I'm watching fights where the winner is known before the final bell providing both men stand up.
-
DIRT SUGAR
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1200
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
I just messaged someone before the decision saying how Mayweather stands Pac on his head coz as he could only fight in spurts but for the life of me didn't see that coming. Awful decision.
Boxing... bloody hell!!!! :??
Boxing... bloody hell!!!! :??
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Globalbox great post 
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Karma for the Marquez gift decision? Manny won last night but got shafted; same as Marquez did last time out.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Gave bradley 2 rounds from the first 10 (just) and much of the other 8 to manny by a wider margin
Then nodded off for large spells of round 11 & 12
Imagine my surprise to wake to hear hatton and buncey discussing a bradley win
credit to timothy for a terrific effort
but never the winner
Then nodded off for large spells of round 11 & 12
Imagine my surprise to wake to hear hatton and buncey discussing a bradley win
credit to timothy for a terrific effort
but never the winner
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Haven't seen it yet but had to laugh at Arum's quote which is up there with his best - 'I will make a lot of money from the rematch - but that decision was disgusting.'
-
freddydoesdallas
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Surely the casinos will ne getting annoyed at these types of results too. If they carry on then punters lose interest in betting on and going to the fight
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Like most it was the wrong winner for me also, Pacquiao only fought for 30secs of each round and most of his flurries missed and hit the gloves BUT he still landed the better punches throughout the fight.
Pac seemed to struggle a bit when Bradley just used the jab, I dont think mayweather would lose a single round against Pac.
Pac seemed to struggle a bit when Bradley just used the jab, I dont think mayweather would lose a single round against Pac.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Can't say I'm in the least but bothered, Mayweather v Pac as a match up had already lost it's mystique. Even more so now after their most recent performances.
It certainly sounds like Pacquiao needs to hang them up.
It certainly sounds like Pacquiao needs to hang them up.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Haven't seen the fight yet but it sounds like a dodgy outcome. Can anyone make a case for it being a good decision?
Won me a few quid though
Won me a few quid though
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
But we all know pacman won convincingly so why should he hang up his gloves ?Kilburn wrote:Can't say I'm in the least but bothered, Mayweather v Pac as a match up had already lost it's mystique. Even more so now after their most recent performances.
It certainly sounds like Pacquiao needs to hang them up.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Why he just beat a young unbeaten fighter pretty comfortably, why that mean he should hang em up?Kilburn wrote:Can't say I'm in the least but bothered, Mayweather v Pac as a match up had already lost it's mystique. Even more so now after their most recent performances.
It certainly sounds like Pacquiao needs to hang them up.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
anyone got a link?
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
I gave Bradley the 10th ( i had viewing problems in the 11th) and 12th he maybe earned a draw in the 1st. But no more than 4 rounds i'd say. Bradley didn't deserve the win but neither did Pacquiao in the last fight with Marquez. It's not the fighters fault it's the judges. This is no worse than Abril getting the shaft against Rios or Campillo getting a bit of the same vs Cloud. People may be a bit more outraged because its Pacquiao but are we really that shocked at these decisions anymore.
Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
i've just watched the fight unfortunatley 3 of the rounds were missing so i can judge the fight as a whole. One thing i would say is alot of the rounds people are saying pac clearly won i scored to bradley, 1st , 2nd, 10th, 12th were all bradleys i cant see how anyone scored the 12th to pac. The rounds i gave to pac; i think the judges scored them to bradley due to work rate but seemed to miss that the punches werent actually beating pacs guard.
-
Quixall
- Heavyweight

Re: Pacman Bradley spoiler
Good post man, totally agree and feel the same.GlobalBox wrote:Could not give Bradley more than 4 rounds, I just cannot believe that decision, some fights are close and you could argue either way but there really was only one man
who won that fight, there is no way you can find 7 rounds for Bradley.
It seems clear to me that there is no one out there other than Mayweather to fight Pacquaio, the public has had enough of these other challengers to Pac, so what they
have done is invent something, they now have a rematch of a bad result, they will jack up the shit between now and November and it will sell as your average boxing fan
will want to see justice done. Arum will convince Pac to get a little bit angry in a few days and that will keep it in the public domain and just keep building it, sell out arena again, more tv countries
than ever take the fight to see if the "champ" can come back and claim his crowns.
Just beginning to run out of steam for my sport now, no real allegiances to either man but getting sick and tired of bullshit constantly, arguments, inside politics, bad judging, early stoppages, blatent favouritism, boxers being stopped fighting by promoters etc.
Its been a passion of mine for 40 years, I need something to keep me in guys, because right now, I'm watching fights where the winner is known before the final bell providing both men stand up.