brittish p4p ratings
brittish p4p ratings
http://boxrec.com/ratings.php?country=U ... &SUBMIT=Go
can anyone explain to me how ricky burns, a 2 wieght world champion, unbeaten in 6 title fights finds himself behind:
kell brook, a man who is about to fight his first world title eliminator
david haye, a man who is retired (ok, he came out of retirement to fight an unlicensed fight).
and most importantly
tyson f**king fury, a nugget that ducked a brittish title fight to fight a 40 year old for his irish title.
david haye i'll give them as, if you take away the fact that he's acted like a prize plum recently and is an unlicense fighter,
he is still a 2 wieght world champion.
although you could point to ricky being above him by merit of still being a world champion, being undefeated in world title fights.
you could also point back to david having unified a division
but c'mon boxrec. brook and fury can't possibly be above him,
a mars bar an a can of coke to the first man who can provide a convincing argument for either
can anyone explain to me how ricky burns, a 2 wieght world champion, unbeaten in 6 title fights finds himself behind:
kell brook, a man who is about to fight his first world title eliminator
david haye, a man who is retired (ok, he came out of retirement to fight an unlicensed fight).
and most importantly
tyson f**king fury, a nugget that ducked a brittish title fight to fight a 40 year old for his irish title.
david haye i'll give them as, if you take away the fact that he's acted like a prize plum recently and is an unlicense fighter,
he is still a 2 wieght world champion.
although you could point to ricky being above him by merit of still being a world champion, being undefeated in world title fights.
you could also point back to david having unified a division
but c'mon boxrec. brook and fury can't possibly be above him,
a mars bar an a can of coke to the first man who can provide a convincing argument for either
Re: brittish p4p ratings
I agree fury shouldn't be there, but brook is more talented, undefeated and fought higher ranked fighters then burns !
Re: brittish p4p ratings
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=28051davie wrote: can anyone explain to me how ricky burns, a 2 wieght world champion, unbeaten in 6 title fights finds himself behind..
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: brittish p4p ratings
You need to understand how these rankings work.
It's a complex points system driven by the computer, based on the information in the results / schedule section of boxrec.
Never seen a rankings system that works perfectly to be honest - and that includes this one.
Click on the "explanation" button for full details how it works.
It's a complex points system driven by the computer, based on the information in the results / schedule section of boxrec.
Never seen a rankings system that works perfectly to be honest - and that includes this one.
Click on the "explanation" button for full details how it works.
Re: brittish p4p ratings
Fought and defended Euro title, whereas all Groves has done is beat Paul Smith it's right to have him abovewesley05 wrote:De gale above George groves WHAT !!!!
-
wesley05
- Heavyweight

Re: brittish p4p ratings
Yes but also beat chunky quit easily IMO surly you lose ranking points for a lossCamcas wrote:Fought and defended Euro title, whereas all Groves has done is beat Paul Smith it's right to have him abovewesley05 wrote:De gale above George groves WHAT !!!!
Re: brittish p4p ratings
Groves hasn't done anything since though, with the exception of the win over Smith.
DeGale had beaten a tough opponent to win the European and then went abroad to defend it, which he did in style.
DeGale had beaten a tough opponent to win the European and then went abroad to defend it, which he did in style.
Re: brittish p4p ratings
Its wasn't easily at all it was a fight that could have gone either way and yes after Groves loss Degale would have been below, but his two recent wins put him above thatwesley05 wrote:Yes but also beat chunky quit easily IMO surly you lose ranking points for a lossCamcas wrote:Fought and defended Euro title, whereas all Groves has done is beat Paul Smith it's right to have him abovewesley05 wrote:De gale above George groves WHAT !!!!
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: brittish p4p ratings
With the fullest of respect to Brook how can you say hes fought better people than Ricky you clown,Ricky fought the ring mag No1 in Martinez,Katsitas ex Interim champ and Moses ex Champion. Kell hasnt fought anyone in top 15 yet as far as im awarejessi wrote:I agree fury shouldn't be there, but brook is more talented, undefeated and fought higher ranked fighters then burns !
Re: brittish p4p ratings
billy nelson wrote:With the fullest of respect to Brook how can you say hes fought better people than Ricky you clown,Ricky fought the ring mag No1 in Martinez,Katsitas ex Interim champ and Moses ex Champion. Kell hasnt fought anyone in top 15 yet as far as im awarejessi wrote:I agree fury shouldn't be there, but brook is more talented, undefeated and fought higher ranked fighters then burns !
pretty much what i was thinking when i read that
brook is no doubt talented and will be a world champion one day and may perhaps go on to be rightfully higher ranked than ricky or other current brittish title holders,
but, as far as i see it, until you've fought and won at a higher level, you cannot be ranked higher on any repectable rankings system.
and kell brook has not, not even nearly!
Re: brittish p4p ratings
Nobody goes by these ratings on here, we prefer to wait until 00:01 on the first of every month for the official listdavie wrote:http://boxrec.com/ratings.php?country=U ... &SUBMIT=Go
can anyone explain to me how ricky burns, a 2 wieght world champion, unbeaten in 6 title fights finds himself behind:
kell brook, a man who is about to fight his first world title eliminator
david haye, a man who is retired (ok, he came out of retirement to fight an unlicensed fight).
and most importantly
tyson f**king fury, a nugget that ducked a brittish title fight to fight a 40 year old for his irish title.
david haye i'll give them as, if you take away the fact that he's acted like a prize plum recently and is an unlicense fighter,
he is still a 2 wieght world champion.
although you could point to ricky being above him by merit of still being a world champion, being undefeated in world title fights.
you could also point back to david having unified a division
but c'mon boxrec. brook and fury can't possibly be above him,
a mars bar an a can of coke to the first man who can provide a convincing argument for either
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: brittish p4p ratings
I think Kells class when going forward and hope he does go on to win a world title soondavie wrote:billy nelson wrote:With the fullest of respect to Brook how can you say hes fought better people than Ricky you clown,Ricky fought the ring mag No1 in Martinez,Katsitas ex Interim champ and Moses ex Champion. Kell hasnt fought anyone in top 15 yet as far as im awarejessi wrote:I agree fury shouldn't be there, but brook is more talented, undefeated and fought higher ranked fighters then burns !
pretty much what i was thinking when i read that
brook is no doubt talented and will be a world champion one day and may perhaps go on to be rightfully higher ranked than ricky or other current brittish title holders,
but, as far as i see it, until you've fought and won at a higher level, you cannot be ranked higher on any repectable rankings system.
and kell brook has not, not even nearly!
Re: brittish p4p ratings
where do you come by these?
Nobody goes by these ratings on here, we prefer to wait until 00:01 on the first of every month for the official list
The official ratings, whos official ratings? ring/wba/wbc/ibf/wbo?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23139
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: brittish p4p ratings
Its Horse's! And then we all argue for a week with him!davie wrote:where do you come by these?
Nobody goes by these ratings on here, we prefer to wait until 00:01 on the first of every month for the official list
The official ratings, whos official ratings? ring/wba/wbc/ibf/wbo?
Re: brittish p4p ratings
horse's?mickey1975 wrote:Its Horse's! And then we all argue for a week with him!davie wrote:where do you come by these?
Nobody goes by these ratings on here, we prefer to wait until 00:01 on the first of every month for the official list
The official ratings, whos official ratings? ring/wba/wbc/ibf/wbo?
you've lost me, give us a link
Re: brittish p4p ratings
http://www.boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=152838davie wrote:horse's?
you've lost me, give us a link