Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
what would happen in an actual fight between these two. Lets have a detailed description of the fight and the issues both would have to deal with rather than a simple Ali wpts 12. etc. Thanks
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
as difficult as frazier.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
I would favor a peak Ali but VERY narrowly.
In many ways Dempsey is a stiffer test than Frazier . . .bigger puncher, quicker, more explosive, at his peak harder to hit. Ali of course would come with his usual advantages . . amazing speed and athleticism for a man his size and a great outside game. This would be as good as the first Ali-Frazier fight.
In many ways Dempsey is a stiffer test than Frazier . . .bigger puncher, quicker, more explosive, at his peak harder to hit. Ali of course would come with his usual advantages . . amazing speed and athleticism for a man his size and a great outside game. This would be as good as the first Ali-Frazier fight.
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
If Ali came to the dance with the attitude he had in the FOC....he loses. you know the statement...("It'll be like a pro vs an amateur") He comes mentally prepared as he did in the second fight.....he would squeak by. Even if the ref gave Jack a few extra moments to catch his breath if Muhammad started to hammer him a bit too soundly.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
BoxBuzz wrote:If Ali came to the dance with the attitude he had in the FOC....he loses. you know the statement...("It'll be like a pro vs an amateur") He comes mentally prepared as he did in the second fight.....he would squeak by. Even if the ref gave Jack a few extra moments to catch his breath if Muhammad started to hammer him a bit too soundly.
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Ali SD.
-
Sven Tingstrom
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 02 May 2011, 11:00
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Easy one. Dempsey = a quicker version of Joe Frazier with a better chin. Dempsey by decision.
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Better chin than Frazier? Based on what? Dempsey was stagered and dropped by fighters that would have barely buckled Fraziers knees.Sven Tingstrom wrote:Easy one. Dempsey = a quicker version of Joe Frazier with a better chin. Dempsey by decision.
Dempsey never faced anyone remotely like Ali. He would be befulled by his combination of size, speed, movement and yes, Ali's power.
Ali clear dec or late tko.
-
MEISINGER
- Heavyweight

Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
i agreetheone wrote:Better chin than Frazier? Based on what? Dempsey was stagered and dropped by fighters that would have barely buckled Fraziers knees.Sven Tingstrom wrote:Easy one. Dempsey = a quicker version of Joe Frazier with a better chin. Dempsey by decision.
Dempsey never faced anyone remotely like Ali. He would be befulled by his combination of size, speed, movement and yes, Ali's power.
Ali clear dec or late tko.
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
x2Goodnight, Irene wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:If Ali came to the dance with the attitude he had in the FOC....he loses. you know the statement...("It'll be like a pro vs an amateur") He comes mentally prepared as he did in the second fight.....he would squeak by. Even if the ref gave Jack a few extra moments to catch his breath if Muhammad started to hammer him a bit too soundly.
No, make it x10.
Put down the crack pipe, Buzz.
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
So you don't think humility would serve?
If he honestly thought there was a huge gap between his and Fraziers skills, he was given a lesson wasn't he?
He seemed a bit contrite and willing to take less chances the second time around.... so I'm confused why my thoughts are laughable....(any more or less than they always are by my fellow "experts". lol)
So....if he comes in cocky, and assured that he will make a fool of Dempsey....that's going to serve him well? I doubt you'll convince me....but Please clarify.....I've put down the hash pipe......and wait for true enlightenment.
If he honestly thought there was a huge gap between his and Fraziers skills, he was given a lesson wasn't he?
He seemed a bit contrite and willing to take less chances the second time around.... so I'm confused why my thoughts are laughable....(any more or less than they always are by my fellow "experts". lol)
So....if he comes in cocky, and assured that he will make a fool of Dempsey....that's going to serve him well? I doubt you'll convince me....but Please clarify.....I've put down the hash pipe......and wait for true enlightenment.
-
Borinken25
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 721
- Joined: 08 Jul 2005, 12:28
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
I pick Ali by clear decision. I think Ali's movement and jab would be a nightmare for Dempsey.
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Dempsey was stopped only once in over 83 fights, and that was a likely dive. Dempsey getting dropped/stunned by Firpo and Carpentier isn't any worse than Frazier getting hurt and dropped twice by Bonavena or having his knees buckle vs Joe Bugner/Manuel Ramos.theone wrote:Better chin than Frazier? Based on what? Dempsey was stagered and dropped by fighters that would have barely buckled Fraziers knees.Sven Tingstrom wrote:Easy one. Dempsey = a quicker version of Joe Frazier with a better chin. Dempsey by decision.
Dempsey never faced anyone remotely like Ali. He would be befulled by his combination of size, speed, movement and yes, Ali's power.
Ali clear dec or late tko.
Yes, Dempsey never faced an Ali, but it goes vice versa. And to say Dempsey would be overwhelmed by Ali's power is laughable. Speed kills speed and Dempsey's footspeed and explosiveness would give Ali a TON of problems.
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Borinken25 wrote:I pick Ali by clear decision. I think Ali's movement and jab would be a nightmare for Dempsey.
Tend to agree with this.
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
BoxBuzz wrote:So you don't think humility would serve?
If he honestly thought there was a huge gap between his and Fraziers skills, he was given a lesson wasn't he?
He seemed a bit contrite and willing to take less chances the second time around.... so I'm confused why my thoughts are laughable....(any more or less than they always are by my fellow "experts". lol)
So....if he comes in cocky, and assured that he will make a fool of Dempsey....that's going to serve him well? I doubt you'll convince me....but Please clarify.....I've put down the hash pipe......and wait for true enlightenment.
Any notion that Ali took Frazier lightly in the FOTC is bullshit.
He knew he was in for the fight of his life going into 3/8/71.
He was trying to screw with Frazier's head with the clown moves early on.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
yancey wrote:BoxBuzz wrote:So you don't think humility would serve?
If he honestly thought there was a huge gap between his and Fraziers skills, he was given a lesson wasn't he?
He seemed a bit contrite and willing to take less chances the second time around.... so I'm confused why my thoughts are laughable....(any more or less than they always are by my fellow "experts". lol)
So....if he comes in cocky, and assured that he will make a fool of Dempsey....that's going to serve him well? I doubt you'll convince me....but Please clarify.....I've put down the hash pipe......and wait for true enlightenment.
Any notion that Ali took Frazier lightly in the FOTC is bullshit.
He knew he was in for the fight of his life going into 3/8/71.
He was trying to screw with Frazier's head with the clown moves early on.
The idea that he just kind of winged it for the biggest fight of his career...
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
gotcha
But I think Frazier was his medicine. Don't think I've made much of a secret of that.
I do think Ali believed his own hype. But Joe instructed him otherwise.
Not to say that he didn't go in at the best he could muster "Pre FOTC Whuppin".
But Joe genuinely taught him that would need to "kick it up a notch"....lol.
But I think Frazier was his medicine. Don't think I've made much of a secret of that.
I do think Ali believed his own hype. But Joe instructed him otherwise.
Not to say that he didn't go in at the best he could muster "Pre FOTC Whuppin".
But Joe genuinely taught him that would need to "kick it up a notch"....lol.
-
Sven Tingstrom
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 02 May 2011, 11:00
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Finally, somebody on this internet with a brain.dempseyfire wrote:Dempsey was stopped only once in over 83 fights, and that was a likely dive. Dempsey getting dropped/stunned by Firpo and Carpentier isn't any worse than Frazier getting hurt and dropped twice by Bonavena or having his knees buckle vs Joe Bugner/Manuel Ramos.theone wrote:Better chin than Frazier? Based on what? Dempsey was stagered and dropped by fighters that would have barely buckled Fraziers knees.Sven Tingstrom wrote:Easy one. Dempsey = a quicker version of Joe Frazier with a better chin. Dempsey by decision.
Dempsey never faced anyone remotely like Ali. He would be befulled by his combination of size, speed, movement and yes, Ali's power.
Ali clear dec or late tko.
Yes, Dempsey never faced an Ali, but it goes vice versa. And to say Dempsey would be overwhelmed by Ali's power is laughable. Speed kills speed and Dempsey's footspeed and explosiveness would give Ali a TON of problems.
-
Sven Tingstrom
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 02 May 2011, 11:00
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Finally, somebody on this internet with a brain.dempseyfire wrote:Dempsey was stopped only once in over 83 fights, and that was a likely dive. Dempsey getting dropped/stunned by Firpo and Carpentier isn't any worse than Frazier getting hurt and dropped twice by Bonavena or having his knees buckle vs Joe Bugner/Manuel Ramos.theone wrote:Better chin than Frazier? Based on what? Dempsey was stagered and dropped by fighters that would have barely buckled Fraziers knees.Sven Tingstrom wrote:Easy one. Dempsey = a quicker version of Joe Frazier with a better chin. Dempsey by decision.
Dempsey never faced anyone remotely like Ali. He would be befulled by his combination of size, speed, movement and yes, Ali's power.
Ali clear dec or late tko.
Yes, Dempsey never faced an Ali, but it goes vice versa. And to say Dempsey would be overwhelmed by Ali's power is laughable. Speed kills speed and Dempsey's footspeed and explosiveness would give Ali a TON of problems.
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Ali bigger n faster than Tunney . Dempsey lost to the best he fought (Tunney)and did not fight the other best of his day. Ali beat the best guys he fought except Holmes n fought sum of the best in heavy history. Ali too big n fast for Dempsey plus he had the chin to absorb almost anything. This is just my humble opinion
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Dempsey seemed to have major problems with catching up to The Great Tunney. Imo Ali is even faster than Tunneydempseyfire wrote:Dempsey was stopped only once in over 83 fights, and that was a likely dive. Dempsey getting dropped/stunned by Firpo and Carpentier isn't any worse than Frazier getting hurt and dropped twice by Bonavena or having his knees buckle vs Joe Bugner/Manuel Ramos.theone wrote:Better chin than Frazier? Based on what? Dempsey was stagered and dropped by fighters that would have barely buckled Fraziers knees.Sven Tingstrom wrote:Easy one. Dempsey = a quicker version of Joe Frazier with a better chin. Dempsey by decision.
Dempsey never faced anyone remotely like Ali. He would be befulled by his combination of size, speed, movement and yes, Ali's power.
Ali clear dec or late tko.
Yes, Dempsey never faced an Ali, but it goes vice versa. And to say Dempsey would be overwhelmed by Ali's power is laughable. Speed kills speed and Dempsey's footspeed and explosiveness would give Ali a TON of problems.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
Dempsey was old.
And lets not go the Conn route of mistaking Tunney for a smaller Ali. They had major distinctions.
And lets not go the Conn route of mistaking Tunney for a smaller Ali. They had major distinctions.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
dempseyfire wrote:Dempsey was stopped only once in over 83 fights, and that was a likely dive. Dempsey getting dropped/stunned by Firpo and Carpentier isn't any worse than Frazier getting hurt and dropped twice by Bonavena or having his knees buckle vs Joe Bugner/Manuel Ramos.theone wrote:Better chin than Frazier? Based on what? Dempsey was stagered and dropped by fighters that would have barely buckled Fraziers knees.Sven Tingstrom wrote:Easy one. Dempsey = a quicker version of Joe Frazier with a better chin. Dempsey by decision.
Dempsey never faced anyone remotely like Ali. He would be befulled by his combination of size, speed, movement and yes, Ali's power.
Ali clear dec or late tko.
Dempsey didn't fight those guys after barely ten pro bouts. Of course you know that, but choose not to mention it as you overrate your hero. Dempsey would have been slaughtered by either Frazier or Ali.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
As for the fight, it would be entertaining and Dempsey would probably stun Ali a time or two with hooks while Ali keeps a jab in his face and fires right hands behind it. 11-4 Ali
Re: Muhammed Ali v Jack Dempsey
I see Dempsey winning a first contest between the two. Ali would try and dance early in the first but would find jack just walks him down and coming in in that crouch (superior to Nortons) lashing the left hook and right that Frazier didnt have.... in the first round, Ali would get dragged into a brawl and fight stationary...its a tough night for Ali. It would be a real pier 6 brawl, similar to the first Frazier fight....... with Dempsey breaking Alis jaw on the way to a close decision win.BoxBuzz wrote:If Ali came to the dance with the attitude he had in the FOC....he loses. you know the statement...("It'll be like a pro vs an amateur") He comes mentally prepared as he did in the second fight.....he would squeak by. Even if the ref gave Jack a few extra moments to catch his breath if Muhammad started to hammer him a bit too soundly.
In the rematch(es) Ali would just figure out a way, probably by boxing more/better.