Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by SteveDow »

http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann

I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.

Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by dondada »

Booth also mentions the 'long history between Vann and Al Legedly' which is perhaps more to the point.

The bout might as well be sponsored by Age Concern. Paul Thomas is knocking on and last time I saw John Coyle he was saying 'Gladiators, ready!'
SteveDow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1800
Joined: 25 Aug 2009, 20:05

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by SteveDow »

The main problem with getting a referee is obviously that the BBBC will ban anyone who is involved from refereeing on BBBC licenced shows so it leaves very few options.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by dondada »

SteveDow wrote:The main problem with getting a referee is obviously that the BBBC will ban anyone who is involved from refereeing on BBBC licenced shows so it leaves very few options.
Toni Tiberi of the LBF is a ref. Go on Toni son! :box:
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by milpool »

They sometimes have guest referees in the WWE. I reckon it'll add spice to an already tasty match if one of the Klits refereed it!
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by leforge »

milpool wrote:They sometimes have guest referees in the WWE. I reckon it'll add spice to an already tasty match if one of the Klits refereed it!
They have Mike Tyson in like they did in Wwe
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13441
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by jameswilson »

leforge wrote:
milpool wrote:They sometimes have guest referees in the WWE. I reckon it'll add spice to an already tasty match if one of the Klits refereed it!
They have Mike Tyson in like they did in Wwe
I'd prefer Rowdy Roddy Piper. The picture of professionalism and impartiality in the bout he reffed between Bret Hart and Yokozuna at Wrestlemania 10. Tyson didn't exactly show great impartiality in that after the fight he knocked the guy who lost out for complaining.............actually given that Chisora is gonna get beat and will probably complain I'd say Tyson is an excellent choice!!!
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by taffytoon »

jameswilson wrote:
leforge wrote:
milpool wrote:They sometimes have guest referees in the WWE. I reckon it'll add spice to an already tasty match if one of the Klits refereed it!
They have Mike Tyson in like they did in Wwe
I'd prefer Rowdy Roddy Piper. The picture of professionalism and impartiality in the bout he reffed between Bret Hart and Yokozuna at Wrestlemania 10. Tyson didn't exactly show great impartiality in that after the fight he knocked the guy who lost out for complaining.............actually given that Chisora is gonna get beat and will probably complain I'd say Tyson is an excellent choice!!!
Any of the above will just be the icing on this circus freak show, why not get a humped back dwarf? Maybe that will sell a few more tickets.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

SteveDow wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann

I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.

Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
It does matter. When Tyson and Lewis fought that had to get Eddie Cotton who is 6ft 5 and about 230 pounds to ref it to deal with the personalities in the ring.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13441
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by jameswilson »

taffytoon wrote:
jameswilson wrote:
leforge wrote: They have Mike Tyson in like they did in Wwe
I'd prefer Rowdy Roddy Piper. The picture of professionalism and impartiality in the bout he reffed between Bret Hart and Yokozuna at Wrestlemania 10. Tyson didn't exactly show great impartiality in that after the fight he knocked the guy who lost out for complaining.............actually given that Chisora is gonna get beat and will probably complain I'd say Tyson is an excellent choice!!!
Any of the above will just be the icing on this circus freak show, why not get a humped back dwarf? Maybe that will sell a few more tickets.
They were aiming for a hump backed dwarf but Haye and Booth have said no to him.
dalcumly
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1319
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 08:11

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by dalcumly »

I keep looking for the earliest indication as to how the fight won't happen . I had thought a back injury to Haye , then the fall out with Chisora and his trainer ,and now the objections to the referee .
Maybe I've simply been wrong all along ,and this farce will go ahead after all ? However , I STILL believe it will be postponed .
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by wrimc »

I think the Wlad as a guest ref would be class :OhYes:

In all seriousness though I do think there is some weight in the whole small guy pushing pension age reffing two 230+ guys in a ring where it could get nasty. Is he going to be able to take real control if things start to get messy. Physically breaking them up in the clinches?
The_Don1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 07:32

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by The_Don1 »

What about Roger Tillerman? He'd suit the pantomime occasion
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by earsjohn »

IRLangmaid25 wrote:
SteveDow wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann

I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.

Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
It does matter. When Tyson and Lewis fought that had to get Eddie Cotton who is 6ft 5 and about 230 pounds to ref it to deal with the personalities in the ring.
Micky Vann reffed Bruno v Lewis and his size didn't stop him getting involved and giving them a bollocking. I don't think it's the size of the man but the size of the mans' cojones.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by leforge »

earsjohn wrote:
IRLangmaid25 wrote:
SteveDow wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann

I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.

Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
It does matter. When Tyson and Lewis fought that had to get Eddie Cotton who is 6ft 5 and about 230 pounds to ref it to deal with the personalities in the ring.
Micky Vann reffed Bruno v Lewis and his size didn't stop him getting involved and giving them a bollocking. I don't think it's the size of the man but the size of the mans' cojones.
That was nearly 20 years ago he was much younger.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by leforge »

dalcumly wrote:I keep looking for the earliest indication as to how the fight won't happen . I had thought a back injury to Haye , then the fall out with Chisora and his trainer ,and now the objections to the referee .
Maybe I've simply been wrong all along ,and this farce will go ahead after all ? However , I STILL believe it will be postponed .
Not POvetkin step in last moment.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by The Insider »

dondada wrote:Booth also mentions the 'long history between Vann and Al Legedly' which is perhaps more to the point.
^^this^^ is likely to be the reason. What is commonly known as the "WBF years".
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by whiskey »

I side 100% with Team Haye.

Sure, it would be nice to see Vann on these shores again, but he can thank loose cannon Chisora for losing the gig.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by earsjohn »

leforge wrote:
earsjohn wrote:
IRLangmaid25 wrote:
It does matter. When Tyson and Lewis fought that had to get Eddie Cotton who is 6ft 5 and about 230 pounds to ref it to deal with the personalities in the ring.
Micky Vann reffed Bruno v Lewis and his size didn't stop him getting involved and giving them a bollocking. I don't think it's the size of the man but the size of the mans' cojones.
That was nearly 20 years ago he was much younger.
He may have been younger but he wasn't any bigger.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by dondada »

The_Don1 wrote:What about Roger Tillerman? He'd suit the pantomime occasion
Even more so given that he died a couple of months ago. Could be brought into the ring by Paul Bearer.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by orbtastic »

Vann did just fine with Bruno and Lewis and had to take them task several times. He was a little slow in stopping the fight but that wasn't due to his size (or lack of).
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by twenty six »

Insider,
Think you mean the WBU years ?
Of course team Haye are gonna object to Mickey boy.
He refereed a high proportion of Bunny's headline fights and well, let's just say he was a homer.
In the early Hatton years of serious cuts he always found a way of letting the fight go on !
Justice for Ramsay and Thaxton !!!! Both fights should have been stoppped !!!! :TU:
I don't agree with the fight but if it were to fall by the wayside now well boxing would slump further into the abyss.
Dalcumly has mentioned a few indicators that maybe all is not well.
So we need a 6' 5'' refereee who is semi retired and does not give a fook if he gets suspended. Answers on a postcard ....
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

dondada wrote:
The_Don1 wrote:What about Roger Tillerman? He'd suit the pantomime occasion
Even more so given that he died a couple of months ago. Could be brought into the ring by Paul Bearer.
His corpse would do a better job than the live version
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by The Insider »

twenty six wrote:Insider,
Think you mean the WBU years ?
I sure do. Schoolboy error :)

I was of course referring to the dozen or so Wbu fights he did for Hatton.
youngrell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2381
Joined: 30 Jun 2008, 15:56

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by youngrell »

Size isn't really the issue is it? Didn't stop Mills Lane taking control of big men, and he reffed some fights with much more bad blood than this one, Tyson biting Holyfield a good example. This isn't going to be a brawl, Haye will backpedal and box his way through the fight I should imagine.

Shame, I like Mickey Vann, he has better footwork than most boxers.
Post Reply