LBF to sue the BBBC

danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: LBF to sue the BBBC

Post by danconnollyeire »

Counter-puncher wrote:
danconnollyeire wrote:
twenty six wrote:Answer the question. Simples.
What question? You asked no question
twenty six wrote:ADHD summit ?
I hate heights mate.
You are not stating facts. You are providing you take on the matter.
Even you cannot give a guarantee how the legal process will unfold.
If it was factual that licences would not be affected etc etc then why has (for instance) Frankie Gavin refused to appear for fear it will end his chance of being British Champion ?

:TU:
You ask that question about 20 posts ago and I answered it... you've since asked it again twice... you're boring
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: LBF to sue the BBBC

Post by taffytoon »

Under no circumstances is this fight morally right.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28521
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: LBF to sue the BBBC

Post by Coco »

Being morally right and ethically wrong???
All the board have done in ban a fighter who deserves to be banned.
FW on the otherhand is looking for loopholes to make a buck.
Perhaps Joey Barton should look to play in Luxembourg!
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: LBF to sue the BBBC

Post by taffytoon »

Coco wrote:Being morally right and ethically wrong???
All the board have done in ban a fighter who deserves to be banned.
FW on the otherhand is looking for loopholes to make a buck.
Perhaps Joey Barton should look to play in Luxembourg!
Unfortunately they did not ban Derrick, they should have banned him but didn't. What Bunny has done is legally right but to mention morality in the same sentence as Bunny is ludicrous, he goes on about the BBBoC being judge jury and executioner! This coming from a guy who is a fighters manager and promoter is laughable, he has brought the sport down to new levels over the years with his NONE FIGHTS it is now embarrassing to be honest, he should make his fighters fight the best and stop giving them padded careers, at least Hearns and Hatton give us fights that excite us. He goes on and on about the board needs modernising, okay maybe it does need some changes to bring it I to the 21st century and sometimes new blood is good, this also applies to promoters, Bunny needs to step away from the sport and let the younger guys take it forward, at least the likes of Eddie Hearn respect their fighters and best of all PAY THEM. I have learnt over the years that people in glass houses should not throw stones, Bunny lives in a glasshouse yet uses a catapult as his choice of weapons to throw stones at others. Better fit he puts his own house in order before trying to become an interior designer in other peoples houses.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: LBF to sue the BBBC

Post by dondada »

King Geedorah wrote: The Board withdrew the licence,they said Chisora could seek one elsewhere and their own set up left the door open for this move.
Did they though? I still haven't had this confirmed...not that it probably makes any legal difference.
LeedsLad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: LBF to sue the BBBC

Post by LeedsLad »

The Board only have themselves to blame.

Eff them.
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: LBF to sue the BBBC

Post by The Insider »

So do we actually have it confirmed that the LBF are to sue the board?
Post Reply