Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by danconnollyeire »

SteveDow wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann

I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.

Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
Vann's a top ref, no bullshit. Will love him to throw Don Charles' towel out while Chisora's taking a beating HAHAHA!
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by Ezzard »

How brilliant would Lennox be as ref?
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by dondada »

Ezzard wrote:How brilliant would Lennox be as ref?
:yay:
The Insider
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 2581
Joined: 26 Mar 2012, 11:21

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by The Insider »

Ezzard wrote:How brilliant would Lennox be as ref?
Not a chance........









He earns too much money on the entertainment circuit as s Steve Wonder impersonator.
slapbangwhallop
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2031
Joined: 13 Dec 2010, 08:27

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by slapbangwhallop »

I've seen Mickey still ref on the Irish scene and to be honest he is still the best the Europe has to offer.

Plus it would be worth it just to watch him glide around the ring in those high-waist, fitted, personalised trouser again!
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by palooka »

twenty six wrote:Insider,
Think you mean the WBU years ?
Of course team Haye are gonna object to Mickey boy.
He refereed a high proportion of Bunny's headline fights and well, let's just say he was a homer.
In the early Hatton years of serious cuts he always found a way of letting the fight go on !
Justice for Ramsay and Thaxton !!!! Both fights should have been stoppped !!!! :TU:
I don't agree with the fight but if it were to fall by the wayside now well boxing would slump further into the abyss.
Dalcumly has mentioned a few indicators that maybe all is not well.
So we need a 6' 5'' refereee who is semi retired and does not give a fook if he gets suspended. Answers on a postcard ....
Didn't Paul Thomas ref the Hatton v Thaxton bout?
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by loaded_gloves »

Joe Louis was one of the most dignified heavyweights of all time AND he used to ref fights in the 70s. Thus i propose they do what Coachella did with Tupac recently and beam in a Joe Louis hologram to referee proceedings.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by Finn »

cant they just get one of the US refs in like smoger, he was reffing that european prizefighter type show i forget its name.
CiganoBoxer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 14:57

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann

Post by CiganoBoxer »

SteveDow wrote:

Does the size of the referee really matter? .
well apparently it does :lol:
Post Reply